Last visit was: 08 Jun 2026, 17:18 It is currently 08 Jun 2026, 17:18
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Blackcrow1972
Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Last visit: 08 Jun 2026
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
235
 [13]
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 55
Kudos: 235
 [13]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Blackcrow1972
Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Last visit: 08 Jun 2026
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
235
 [2]
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 55
Kudos: 235
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Blackcrow1972
Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Last visit: 08 Jun 2026
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 55
Kudos: 235
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Azakura16
Joined: 17 May 2024
Last visit: 27 Dec 2025
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
71
 [3]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: United States (AR)
GMAT Focus 1: 805 Q90 V90 DI90
GPA: 3.5
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 805 Q90 V90 DI90
Posts: 57
Kudos: 71
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paragraph one introduces two types of cities based on different economic environments. It then explains that both types are important, but smaller, specialized cities have some vulnerabilities that come with working in a less diversified economic environment.
Paragraph two warns against limiting specialization, as the immediate benefits could outweigh potential future losses. It mentions the alternative of government insurance, but brings up some concerns with that solution. It also mentions the alternative of giving local governments the power to restructure their local economies, and then brings up some potential issues with that suggestion. It brings up the link between innovation and diversity, and offers a solution that could encourage that, but mentions a potential complaint if it were to be attempted in some areas.

Q1: According to the passage, one possible disadvantage of limiting specialization is that
P2, S1: But limiting specialization to reduce risk may mean foregoing important immediate benefits to avoid possible future losses
Best answer is E: limiting specialization may involve sacrificing potential short-term benefits

Q2: With regard to risk, which of the following scenarios is most analogous to the situation of specialized cities, as that situation is portrayed in the passage?
P1, S3: The main issue with specialized cities, however, is that...such cities are exposed to greater risk due to the rise and fall of specific sectors and technologies.
Best answer is B: One's personal fortune is at greater risk when one invests it in a single stock than when one invests it in several different stocks.

Q3: The passage most strongly implies that a policy of encouraging labor mobility could
P2, S7: An alternative solution is to encourage labor mobility -but in Europe, for example, this awakens fears about lost regional identities.
Best answer is A: help promote economic diversity in cities but might be impeded by cultural attitudes
User avatar
eaat
Joined: 14 Dec 2025
Last visit: 08 Jun 2026
Posts: 92
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 42
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: General Management
Posts: 92
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. According to the passage, one possible disadvantage of limiting specialization is that

A. any policy involves some risk, and the level of risk to be expected from limiting specialization is not always clear
B. insurance is available to cover any potential losses resulting from specialization
C. some unexpected and valuable innovations can result from specialization
D. future losses resulting from limiting specialization may outweigh present benefits
E. limiting specialization may involve sacrificing potential short-term benefits


Why can't this answer be D? It's kind of right, no?
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 08 Jun 2026
Posts: 1,384
Own Kudos:
12,477
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,384
Kudos: 12,477
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. According to the passage, one possible disadvantage of limiting specialization is that

The passage says specialized cities get immediate benefits from specialization, such as less crowding and stronger localization economies. But limiting specialization to reduce future risk may require giving up those immediate benefits. So the disadvantage is sacrificing present benefits to avoid possible future losses.

A. any policy involves some risk, and the level of risk to be expected from limiting specialization is not always clear

Wrong. The passage does not say the risk of limiting specialization is unclear. It says limiting specialization may sacrifice current benefits.

B. insurance is available to cover any potential losses resulting from specialization

Wrong. This is about an alternative to limiting specialization, not a disadvantage of limiting specialization itself.

C. some unexpected and valuable innovations can result from specialization

Wrong. The passage actually connects innovation more strongly with diversity, not with highly specialized environments.

D. future losses resulting from limiting specialization may outweigh present benefits

Wrong. This reverses the passage’s point. The passage says limiting specialization may give up immediate benefits to avoid possible future losses.

E. limiting specialization may involve sacrificing potential short-term benefits

Correct. The passage directly says that limiting specialization to reduce risk may mean foregoing important immediate benefits.

Answer: (E)
User avatar
shibprasad
Joined: 15 Oct 2014
Last visit: 08 Jun 2026
Posts: 10
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For Question 3: why ans option A is incorrect: help promote economic diversity in cities but might be impeded by cultural attitudes

An alternative solution is to encourage labor mobility -but in Europe, for example, this awakens fears about lost regional identities.
Reason 1: The passage talks about Europe and the ans option is generalising the same.
Reason 2: awakens fears about lost regional identities - Labour mobility - > lost regional identities, but regional identity does not threaten mobility.
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 08 Jun 2026
Posts: 1,384
Own Kudos:
12,477
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,384
Kudos: 12,477
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
3. The passage most strongly implies that a policy of encouraging labor mobility could

The passage discusses the risk of specialized cities: if one sector declines, the city is vulnerable. It then considers possible solutions, including government insurance, local restructuring, and finally labor mobility. The point about labor mobility is that it could help deal with the risks of specialization, but in Europe it may face resistance because people fear the loss of regional identity.

A. help promote economic diversity in cities but might be impeded by cultural attitudes

This is correct. Labor mobility could help reduce the risks of overly specialized local economies by allowing workers and economic activity to shift more easily. But the passage says this policy can awaken fears about lost regional identities, which are cultural concerns that could impede it.

B. increase the levels of certain types of risk without bringing substantial economic benefits

This is not supported. Labor mobility is presented as a possible solution, not as something that clearly increases risk without benefits.

C. increase workforce skill levels in cities and counter fears about loss of regional identities

This is incorrect. The passage does not say labor mobility increases skill levels, and it says it awakens fears about lost regional identities, not that it counters them.

D. increase innovation while preserving regional identities and keeping cities highly specialized economically

This is too strong. The passage does not say labor mobility would preserve regional identities; it says the opposite concern may arise.

E. reduce regional economic diversity in Europe to a greater extent than elsewhere

This is not supported. The passage mentions Europe only as an example of where fears about regional identity may be especially relevant.

Answer: (A)
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 08 Jun 2026
Posts: 1,384
Own Kudos:
12,477
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,384
Kudos: 12,477
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
2. With regard to risk, which of the following scenarios is most analogous to the situation of specialized cities, as that situation is portrayed in the passage?

The passage says specialized cities can gain benefits from focusing on one sector, but they face greater risk because their fortunes depend heavily on that sector or technology. The analogy is concentration risk: depending on one thing is riskier than being diversified.

A. Small publishing companies are at risk of being submerged by larger publishing companies.

This is not parallel. The issue is not small versus large, but dependence on one economic sector.

B. One's personal fortune is at greater risk when one invests it in a single stock than when one invests it in several different stocks.
This is correct. A specialized city is like investing in one stock: if that sector declines, the city is heavily exposed. A diversified city is like investing in several stocks, where risk is spread out.

C. Manufacturing and finding a market for an innovative product usually involves a greater risk than for a traditional product.

This is about innovation risk, not the risk of relying heavily on one sector.

D. Athletes who compete as part of a team are at greater risk of not achieving distinction than are athletes who compete as individuals.

This is not parallel. The passage is about economic vulnerability, not individual recognition.

E. The farther away from the center one lives in a city, the more one is at risk of losing touch with changes in the city.

This is unrelated to the specialization/diversification issue.

Answer: (B)
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7394 posts
673 posts
26 posts