Paragraph one introduces two types of cities based on different economic environments. It then explains that both types are important, but smaller, specialized cities have some vulnerabilities that come with working in a less diversified economic environment.
Paragraph two warns against limiting specialization, as the immediate benefits could outweigh potential future losses. It mentions the alternative of government insurance, but brings up some concerns with that solution. It also mentions the alternative of giving local governments the power to restructure their local economies, and then brings up some potential issues with that suggestion. It brings up the link between innovation and diversity, and offers a solution that could encourage that, but mentions a potential complaint if it were to be attempted in some areas.
Q1: According to the passage, one possible disadvantage of limiting specialization is that
P2, S1: But limiting specialization to reduce risk may mean foregoing important immediate benefits to avoid possible future losses
Best answer is E: limiting specialization may involve sacrificing potential short-term benefits
Q2: With regard to risk, which of the following scenarios is most analogous to the situation of specialized cities, as that situation is portrayed in the passage?
P1, S3: The main issue with specialized cities, however, is that...such cities are exposed to greater risk due to the rise and fall of specific sectors and technologies.
Best answer is B: One's personal fortune is at greater risk when one invests it in a single stock than when one invests it in several different stocks.
Q3: The passage most strongly implies that a policy of encouraging labor mobility could
P2, S7: An alternative solution is to encourage labor mobility -but in Europe, for example, this awakens fears about lost regional identities.
Best answer is A: help promote economic diversity in cities but might be impeded by cultural attitudes