It is currently 16 Dec 2017, 09:00

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In 1979, a team of scientists from Berkeley working near Gubbio, Italy

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Top Contributor
Senior RC Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done!!
Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 1069

Kudos [?]: 1606 [0], given: 282

Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V34
WE: General Management (Aerospace and Defense)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
In 1979, a team of scientists from Berkeley working near Gubbio, Italy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2017, 09:07
Top Contributor
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

26% (03:29) correct 74% (02:53) wrong based on 163

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

38% (00:58) correct 62% (00:58) wrong based on 154

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

47% (01:14) correct 53% (00:30) wrong based on 160

HideShow timer Statistics

In 1979, a team of scientists from Berkeley working near Gubbio, Italy, discovered a layer of clay that revolutionized theories concerning the disappearance of the dinosaur, which had centred on the assumed gradual climatic change. Beneath the two-centimetre-thick layer lay limestone containing fossil organisms from the late Cretaceous, while above it was limestone with early Cenozoic fossils.

Positionally, then, the Berkeley group could place the clay in a period roughly contemporaneous with the disappearance of the dinosaur approximately 63 million years ago. They found that the clay stratum contained an iridium level thirty times greater than that of clays in adjacent strata. As iridium is distributed fairly evenly over time through micrometeoritic impact, the researchers knew that the anomalous matter in the clay must have originated extra-terrestrially; the high iridium level, moreover, indicated a sudden deposition in an exceptional, catastrophic event.

Scientists are sharply divided on the possible causes of so cataclysmic an event. The possibility that the deposition occurred as an aftereffect of a supernova has been discounted: radioactive isotope Pu-244 was absent from the clay, and neither Ir-191 nor Ir-193 were present in significant proportions.

Those who maintain that the material came from within the solar system contend that the earth must have collided during the late Cretaceous with an astral body large enough to have distributed the iridium-rich material over the globe. An asteroid of the required mass would have been approximately ten kilometres in diameter; a comet would have to have been twice as large, since comets are largely composed of ice water.

Trying to fathom the scale of such an event as this is mind boggling. It is true that from space, an object 10-20 miles across colliding with earth would be akin to something smaller than a grain of sand landing on a basketball, it is also the case that an object twenty miles across that landed on earth would be nearly twice as tall as Mt. Everest (the tallest mountain on Earth) and further across than the length of Manhattan. Furthermore, when the body came crashing to Earth it would have been ablaze in an inferno caused by the friction of entry into our atmosphere. To the argument that there is no geological evidence of the impact of such massive objects, Richard Grieve has replied that the clay layer could have resettled after the impact in the form of fallout. Frank Kyte of UCLA asserts that a comet, if disrupted by the earth‘s gravitational field, would have exposed the surface to a deluge of debris that would not have created major craters. Alternatively, the Berkeley group suggests that an asteroid may have landed in the sea; such a collision would have produced tidal waves eight kilometres high, swamping large areas of the earth.

Whatever the type of body and mode of impact, Walter Alvarez of the Berkeley team argues that the primary effect of the catastrophe was to disrupt the planetary ecology through the suspension of vast clouds of matter in the stratosphere. The effects of the initial impact would have been greatly multiplied, Alvarez argues, as photosynthesis was impeded by the blockage of sunlight; there would then have been a massive disruption at the base of the dinosaur‘s food chain.

The passage discusses a new discovery that may change the way scientists think about one aspect of dinosaurs. It can be inferred that the discovery described in the passage may ―revolutionize‖ (line 4) which aspect of current theories about dinosaurs?
A. The geographical extent of the presumed habitation of the dinosaur
B. The approximate date at which dinosaurs are thought to have become extinct
C. The assumption that dinosaurs became extinct because of a change in their natural environment
D. The rate at which the extinction of the dinosaur is thought to have occurred
E. The notion that dinosaurs became extinct because of the onset of an ice age.


According to the passage, the Berkeley group used which of the following to support their hypothesis on the disappearance of the dinosaur?
I. A comparison of the fossil records of various marine strata
II. A comparison of different clay strata near Gubbio, Italy
III. A comparison of marine strata in several locations
A. I only
B. III only
C. I and II
D. II and III
E. I, II and III


According to the information presented by the author throughout the passage, scientists used the analysis of the isotopes present in the clay to:
A. estimate the age of the stratum more exactly.
B. determine the extent of meteoritic impact upon the earth.
C. derive a hypothesis concerning the effect of the impact of an extraplanetary body on the earth‘s ecology.
D. eliminate a possible theory concerning the enriched clay‘s formation.
E. determine whether dinosaurs were allergic to these

[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #1 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #2 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #3 OA

_________________

Become a GMAT Club Premium member to avail lot of discounts

Kudos [?]: 1606 [0], given: 282

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 18 Mar 2015
Posts: 100

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 113

Location: India
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V26
GPA: 3.59
Reviews Badge
In 1979, a team of scientists from Berkeley working near Gubbio, Italy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2017, 09:25
nice passage.. 2 correct answer (1 and 3) and took approx 8.5 mins to solve

need help for question 2 , How III is correct ? I cannot correlate it with the passage.
I. A comparison of the fossil records of various marine strata
II. A comparison of different clay strata near Gubbio, Italy
III. A comparison of marine strata in several locations

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 113

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Sep 2016
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 5

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In 1979, a team of scientists from Berkeley working near Gubbio, Italy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2017, 09:52
What are the answers of the RC... I found option C for question 1, option D for question 2 and option D again for question 3

Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 5

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 18 Mar 2015
Posts: 100

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 113

Location: India
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V26
GPA: 3.59
Reviews Badge
In 1979, a team of scientists from Berkeley working near Gubbio, Italy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2017, 10:46
manoj1115 wrote:
What are the answers of the RC... I found option C for question 1, option D for question 2 and option D again for question 3

Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

answers are 1.D 2.D 3.D. amswer is given with the question

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 113

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Jun 2017
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 22

GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.1
Reviews Badge
Re: In 1979, a team of scientists from Berkeley working near Gubbio, Italy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2017, 11:00
Hmmm.

I agree with Qs 1 and 3. I'm having trouble justifying the OA to question 2? Where in the passage does it discuss marine strata?

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 22

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 26 Mar 2017
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 32

GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Re: In 1979, a team of scientists from Berkeley working near Gubbio, Italy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2017, 14:18
Gnpth wrote:
In 1979, a team of scientists from Berkeley working near Gubbio, Italy, discovered a layer of clay that revolutionized theories concerning the disappearance of the dinosaur, which had centred on the assumed gradual climatic change. Beneath the two-centimetre-thick layer lay limestone containing fossil organisms from the late Cretaceous, while above it was limestone with early Cenozoic fossils.

Positionally, then, the Berkeley group could place the clay in a period roughly contemporaneous with the disappearance of the dinosaur approximately 63 million years ago. They found that the clay stratum contained an iridium level thirty times greater than that of clays in adjacent strata. As iridium is distributed fairly evenly over time through micrometeoritic impact, the researchers knew that the anomalous matter in the clay must have originated extra-terrestrially; the high iridium level, moreover, indicated a sudden deposition in an exceptional, catastrophic event.

Scientists are sharply divided on the possible causes of so cataclysmic an event. The possibility that the deposition occurred as an aftereffect of a supernova has been discounted: radioactive isotope Pu-244 was absent from the clay, and neither Ir-191 nor Ir-193 were present in significant proportions.

Those who maintain that the material came from within the solar system contend that the earth must have collided during the late Cretaceous with an astral body large enough to have distributed the iridium-rich material over the globe. An asteroid of the required mass would have been approximately ten kilometres in diameter; a comet would have to have been twice as large, since comets are largely composed of ice water.

Trying to fathom the scale of such an event as this is mind boggling. It is true that from space, an object 10-20 miles across colliding with earth would be akin to something smaller than a grain of sand landing on a basketball, it is also the case that an object twenty miles across that landed on earth would be nearly twice as tall as Mt. Everest (the tallest mountain on Earth) and further across than the length of Manhattan. Furthermore, when the body came crashing to Earth it would have been ablaze in an inferno caused by the friction of entry into our atmosphere. To the argument that there is no geological evidence of the impact of such massive objects, Richard Grieve has replied that the clay layer could have resettled after the impact in the form of fallout. Frank Kyte of UCLA asserts that a comet, if disrupted by the earth‘s gravitational field, would have exposed the surface to a deluge of debris that would not have created major craters. Alternatively, the Berkeley group suggests that an asteroid may have landed in the sea; such a collision would have produced tidal waves eight kilometres high, swamping large areas of the earth.

Whatever the type of body and mode of impact, Walter Alvarez of the Berkeley team argues that the primary effect of the catastrophe was to disrupt the planetary ecology through the suspension of vast clouds of matter in the stratosphere. The effects of the initial impact would have been greatly multiplied, Alvarez argues, as photosynthesis was impeded by the blockage of sunlight; there would then have been a massive disruption at the base of the dinosaur‘s food chain.

The passage discusses a new discovery that may change the way scientists think about one aspect of dinosaurs. It can be inferred that the discovery described in the passage may ―revolutionize‖ (line 4) which aspect of current theories about dinosaurs?
A. The geographical extent of the presumed habitation of the dinosaur
B. The approximate date at which dinosaurs are thought to have become extinct
C. The assumption that dinosaurs became extinct because of a change in their natural environment
D. The rate at which the extinction of the dinosaur is thought to have occurred
E. The notion that dinosaurs became extinct because of the onset of an ice age.


According to the passage, the Berkeley group used which of the following to support their hypothesis on the disappearance of the dinosaur?
I. A comparison of the fossil records of various marine strata
II. A comparison of different clay strata near Gubbio, Italy
III. A comparison of marine strata in several locations
A. I only
B. III only
C. I and II
D. II and III
E. I, II and III


According to the information presented by the author throughout the passage, scientists used the analysis of the isotopes present in the clay to:
A. estimate the age of the stratum more exactly.
B. determine the extent of meteoritic impact upon the earth.
C. derive a hypothesis concerning the effect of the impact of an extraplanetary body on the earth‘s ecology.
D. eliminate a possible theory concerning the enriched clay‘s formation.
E. determine whether dinosaurs were allergic to these


Gnpth,
Please check the answer choices in Q2. I cannot find anything in the passage that talks about marine data.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 32

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Dec 2015
Posts: 32

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 809

Re: In 1979, a team of scientists from Berkeley working near Gubbio, Italy [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2017, 03:39
Where as mentioned in Q2 answer has the author mentioned that the scientists compared the marine strata and how for Q3 can we deduce that D is correct answer?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 809

Re: In 1979, a team of scientists from Berkeley working near Gubbio, Italy   [#permalink] 30 Aug 2017, 03:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In 1979, a team of scientists from Berkeley working near Gubbio, Italy

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.