dudestud
mechabhi2692
Hope that be the case with mu also. But other factor for isb success was global mba model, 1 year mba was not exclusive to isb, mdi and few other good institutions were already running 1 year program, but they lack in terms of curriculum compared to isb. It was established by former top b school professors, Wharton I guess. Let’s see how mu is able to utilize the Early days success similar to isb. Posted from my mobile device
kellogs and wharton
kelloggs
but why is MU doing so well exceptionally and Top 3 consulting firms going there and not to other IIMs apart from ABC?
i mean alumnis from IIM LIKS eventually make it to Top 3 consulting firms and so why not help out their own like going into IIms LIKS instead of MU?
How and why is the alumni factor as you pointed out not working here?
I am sure that the top positions are also held by IIM grads also from LIKS apart from ABC
Alumini factor is there but again those alumini are mostly 2 year mba students and they come to hire only two year students only at these legacy institutions. They have nothing to do with these 1 year programs.
Reasons could be many, though I am not sure.
a. They are in same building so maybe it was easy for them to get interview scheduled.
b. They got really good batch of students. I found many iitians in their first batch.
c. Legacy institutes don't try to promote 1 year mba like they do for 2 year mba. Even 2 year students don't consider 1 year students as their alumini (harsh but true). For legacy institutes their 2 year program is priority and maybe these firms are more held up to hire those fellas.
d. And maybe there is something really unique about masters union that I am unaware of.