Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
60%
(01:19)
correct 40%
(02:11)
wrong
based on 47
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Statistics show that although consumption of low-calorie, alternative sweeteners has gone up in each of the past five years, so has the percentage of the population that is obese. According to sugar manufacturers, this shows that low-calorie, alternative sweeteners are not effective weight loss aids.
Which of the following assertions if true, would most weaken the sugar manufacturers conclusion ?
A) Many people who use low-calorie , alternatives sweeteners eat some foods that are not low-calorie. B) Some low - claorie , alternative sweeteners can Increase the appetite , making a person eat more than he or she normally would eat. C) Many people use low-calorie, alternative sweeteners to accompany a wel- balanced low-calorie diet D) Obesity has declined among people who have consistently used low-calorie alternative sweeteners E) The rise in the consumption of low-calorie alternative sweeteners is primarily due to an increase in the number of users rather than an increase in the amount each user consumes.
D. I chose "A". Solution says: "A" ALSO weakens by giving the another possible cause for the weight gain, BUT "D" weakens MORE! I agree with that. But I have never see a CR, before this, that makes me choose between 2 right answers. Does that happen in real GMAT?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Statistics show that although consumption of low-calorie, alternative sweeteners has gone up in each of the past five years, so has the percentage of the population that is obese. According to sugar manufacturers, this shows that low-calorie, alternative sweeteners are not effective weight loss aids.
Which of the following assertions if true, would most weaken the sugar manufacturers conclusion ?
A) Many people who use low-calorie , alternatives sweeteners eat some foods that are not low-calorie. B) Some low - claorie , alternative sweeteners can Increase the appetite , making a person eat more than he or she normally would eat. C) Many people use low-calorie, alternative sweeteners to accompany a wel- balanced low-calorie diet D) Obesity has declined among people who have consistently used low-calorie alternative sweeteners E) The rise in the consumption of low-calorie alternative sweeteners is primarily due to an increase in the number of users rather than an increase in the amount each user consumes.
D. I chose "A". Solution says: "A" ALSO weakens by giving the another possible cause for the weight gain, BUT "D" weakens MORE! I agree with that. But I have never see a CR, before this, that makes me choose between 2 right answers. Does that happen in real GMAT?
Show more
Eating some food that are not-low calorie may not cause obesity. Not low-calorie doesn't mean high-calorie. It may just mean enough moderate calorie to maintain weight.
D says: Obesity has declined among people who have consistently used low-calorie alternative sweeteners This is also not strong. It could be coincidental. D appears to suggest a cause-effect relation.
I think D is the best among the choices available. Clearly shows that low calorie helps reducing weight.
In contrast, A leaves room for further assumptions. Many people eat some food that are not low calories- how much? 1 or more than that?? This too weakens but not as much as D.
Eating some food that are not-low calorie may not cause obesity. Not low-calorie doesn't mean high-calorie. It may just mean enough moderate calorie to maintain weight.
D says: Obesity has declined among people who have consistently used low-calorie alternative sweeteners This is also not strong. It could be coincidental. D appears to suggest a cause-effect relation.
However, this is the best among the choices.
Show more
Thanks fluke. A quick question: Seems like this question had the typical Number-Percentage trap?
Stimulus:- Premise: increased "total" low-cal consumption AND increased "%age" of obesity. Conclusion: increased "total" low-cal consumption DOES NOT CAUSE total decreased obesity.
D weakens this causality perfect.
If one identified this trap, he or she could have prephrase by thinking: What if population of the obese people decreased even though the %age increased? And even better if the population of obese people who consumed most of the low-calorie sweetener decreased even of the total number of obese people increased.
For those who are interested in understanding why A is not the answer, let's review the conclusion:
Quote:
According to sugar manufacturers, this shows that low-calorie, alternative sweeteners are not effective weight loss aids.
Show more
Answer A reads:
Quote:
A) Many people who use low-calorie , alternatives sweeteners eat some foods that are not low-calorie.
Show more
This actually strengthens the argument. If true, this clearly means they're not effective aids because they are offset with what is implicitly described to be a tendency to eat higher calorie foods.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.