Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 19:44 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 19:44
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
abhicoolmax
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
Last visit: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 310
Own Kudos:
72
 [2]
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 310
Kudos: 72
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
fluke
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Last visit: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 1,099
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 376
Posts: 1,099
Kudos: 5,094
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Chetangupta
Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Last visit: 04 Oct 2021
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 82
Kudos: 475
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abhicoolmax
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
Last visit: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 310
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 310
Kudos: 72
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fluke

Eating some food that are not-low calorie may not cause obesity. Not low-calorie doesn't mean high-calorie. It may just mean enough moderate calorie to maintain weight.

D says: Obesity has declined among people who have consistently used low-calorie alternative sweeteners
This is also not strong. It could be coincidental. D appears to suggest a cause-effect relation.

However, this is the best among the choices.

Thanks fluke. A quick question: Seems like this question had the typical Number-Percentage trap?

Stimulus:-
Premise: increased "total" low-cal consumption AND increased "%age" of obesity.
Conclusion: increased "total" low-cal consumption DOES NOT CAUSE total decreased obesity.

D weakens this causality perfect.

If one identified this trap, he or she could have prephrase by thinking: What if population of the obese people decreased even though the %age increased? And even better if the population of obese people who consumed most of the low-calorie sweetener decreased even of the total number of obese people increased.
User avatar
zuberahmed
Joined: 14 Feb 2010
Last visit: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Location: Banaglore
Posts: 88
Kudos: 300
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think D is the only option that weakens the conclusion.
User avatar
micr0c0sm
Joined: 06 Jul 2011
Last visit: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Posts: 20
Kudos: 58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D.

For those who are interested in understanding why A is not the answer, let's review the conclusion:
Quote:
According to sugar manufacturers, this shows that low-calorie, alternative sweeteners are not effective weight loss aids.
Answer A reads:
Quote:
A) Many people who use low-calorie , alternatives sweeteners eat some foods that are not low-calorie.
This actually strengthens the argument. If true, this clearly means they're not effective aids because they are offset with what is implicitly described to be a tendency to eat higher calorie foods.
User avatar
bharatemail
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Last visit: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.65
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 30
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
for me also , its D



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,836
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,836
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts