Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 03:13 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 03:13

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Apr 2014
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 50 [50]
Given Kudos: 108
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2014
Posts: 112
Own Kudos [?]: 327 [4]
Given Kudos: 12
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Dec 2012
Posts: 52
Own Kudos [?]: 98 [0]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q51 V28
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41
GPA: 3.55
WE:Engineering (Entertainment and Sports)
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is [#permalink]
Answers (A) and (E) are both equally contenders, why (A) is better than (E). Please help

a.Cream cheese is defined not by its taste, but by its composition.
Since cream cheese cannot be defined with out its composition and cream cheese contains milk products, vegan cannot have cream cake with out its original composition. So vegan cannot be called red velvet.

e.The amount of cream cheese in a red velvet cake is not variable
If it is variable it can vary from 100% to 0%, then in that case it shatters the conclusion and the vegan cake can be called as red velvet.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1015
Own Kudos [?]: 2755 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
OE by veritas prep:

Any Assumption question can be solved by employing the Assumption Negation Technique, and this question is no exception. Negate each answer choice, plug that negation into the argument, and see if the negation undermines or outright refutes the conclusion.

Here answer choice (A) destroys the conclusion: if cream cheese is defined by its taste, then a vegan red velvet cake that tastes like a dairy-based red velvet cake can be referred to as a red velvet cake.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1015
Own Kudos [?]: 2755 [0]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is [#permalink]
ravikrishna1979 wrote:
Answers (A) and (E) are both equally contenders, why (A) is better than (E). Please help

a.Cream cheese is defined not by its taste, but by its composition.
Since cream cheese cannot be defined with out its composition and cream cheese contains milk products, vegan cannot have cream cake with out its original composition. So vegan cannot be called red velvet.

e.The amount of cream cheese in a red velvet cake is not variable
If it is variable it can vary from 100% to 0%, then in that case it shatters the conclusion and the vegan cake can be called as red velvet.


E is nowhere an assumption. Lets negate E and check if it affects the argument.

The amount of cream cheese in a red velvet cake is variable. It need not vary from 0-100% and vary between a close range of 10-15% and still be called variable. But does it matter to the conclusion? No

What is the point of considering 0% of cheese in other words when it does not exist?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2015
Posts: 172
Own Kudos [?]: 601 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
WE:Investment Banking (Venture Capital)
Send PM
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is [#permalink]
2
Kudos
I'll try.

A is correct b/c if you negate it, the A/C says "cream cheese is defined by its taste, not (by) its composition". In the passage, the stickler admits that vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is indistinguishable in taste, texture, and appearance from a traditional dairy-based red velvet cake. Therefore, if cream cheese IS defined by taste (as opposed to composition - or the fact that it has dairy), THEN, the 'vegan red velvet' cake CAN be properly called 'red velvet' cake.

Make sense?
Current Student
Joined: 23 Jul 2015
Posts: 126
Own Kudos [?]: 128 [0]
Given Kudos: 31
Send PM
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is [#permalink]
Choice A is a clear winner for reasons already described above.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 312
Own Kudos [?]: 798 [0]
Given Kudos: 76
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is [#permalink]
Cream cheese is defined not by its taste, but by its composition.

negating it gives => Cream cheese is defined by its taste , but not by composition => breaks the argument.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Dec 2017
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 390
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
Send PM
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is [#permalink]
OA and official answer veritas prep

Solution: A

Any Assumption question can be solved by employing the Assumption Negation Technique, and this question is no exception. Negate each answer choice, plug that negation into the argument, and see if the negation undermines or outright refutes the conclusion. Here answer choice (A) destroys the conclusion: if cream cheese is defined by its taste, then a vegan red velvet cake that tastes like a dairy-based red velvet cake can be referred to as a red velvet cake.
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Oct 2017
Posts: 552
Own Kudos [?]: 481 [0]
Given Kudos: 14
Send PM
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is [#permalink]
Argument mentions that "Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is indistinguishable in taste"

Now Negate A
If it is defined by taste and taste is indistinguishable then there would be no need to have cream cheese.
the whole argument falls apart
So A is best answer
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Oct 2017
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 50
Send PM
Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is [#permalink]
if we apply prethinking then two assumptions pops up
1. one product can not have two definitions
2. definition defines the name of product

as per these two pre though assumption choice C should be correct
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2019
Posts: 404
Own Kudos [?]: 216 [2]
Given Kudos: 372
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
Send PM
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is [#permalink]
2
Kudos
mayank_8jun wrote:
if we apply prethinking then two assumptions pops up
1. one product can not have two definitions
2. definition defines the name of product

as per these two pre though assumption choice C should be correct


My friend, it's good that you're applying prethinking. You'll be good at it soon with practice. Actually, in this question, you missed the general definition of definition and what is does.
1. one product can not have two definitions((Definitions is always single. If there are 2 definition, that mean they will be 2 different thing. Definitions distinguishes between things))
2. definition defines the name of product((Yes, Definition itself mean that it defines something ))

Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is indistinguishable in taste, texture, and appearance from a traditional dairy-based red velvet cake, it should not be referred to as a red velvet cake, even with the vegan qualifier. After all, a red velvet cake by definition contains cream cheese, and no vegan cake can contain cream cheese, only non-dairy approximations.

(C) Any vegan cake ought not to take the name of its non-vegan counterpart.((As per this option. Consider something that is defined and named by it's smell, or taste. Consider it to be non-vegan. Now if there's anything vegan, that has same taste or smell, they they can not be names as their non vegan counterpart ? There are many real examples of such things. If you understand this, you'll be able to understand option A ))
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 241
Own Kudos [?]: 238 [1]
Given Kudos: 1103
Send PM
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Could someone please explain why option C is incorrect? If we negate this option “Any vegan cake OUGHT TO take the name of its non-vegan counterpart”, it breaks down the conclusion as well because in if any vegan cake can take the name of a non-vegan cake, then RV cake can be referred to as a RV cake.
Kellogg School Moderator
Joined: 02 Feb 2015
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 219
Send PM
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is [#permalink]
Why is option C not correct since the negation is: Any vegan cake will take the name of its non-vegan counterpart.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7626 [1]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Top Contributor
nepr9 wrote:
Why is option C not correct since the negation is: Any vegan cake will take the name of its non-vegan counterpart.


Hi

Option (C) states: Any vegan cake ought not to take the name of its non-vegan counterpart.

It's negation is not: Any vegan cake will take the name of its non-vegan counterpart.

The correct negation will be: At least one vegan cake can take the name of its non-vegan counterpart.

This does not negate the conclusion that this particular "red-velvet" cake should not take the name of its non-vegan counterpart, since it is still possible for another vegan cake to take the name of its non-vegan counterpart to satisfy this condition (negated option (C)) and for red-velvet to be barred from taking the name of its non-vegan counterpart.

Hope this clarifies.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Oct 2019
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 57
Send PM
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan ‘red velvet’ cake is [#permalink]
Whats the conclusion of author, if there is one. Can anyone explain?
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17216
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan red velvet cake is [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Stickler: Though I admit that this vegan red velvet cake is [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne