GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 23 Apr 2018, 12:04

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Studies have established that children who watch

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 22 Feb 2018
Posts: 78
Studies have established that children who watch [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2018, 08:28
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (01:16) correct 43% (02:01) wrong based on 56 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Studies have established that children who watched 2 more hours of TV on an average daily basis during the first 15 years of their life were 50℅ more likely to be arrested for property crimes in the country. Researchers believe that these studies clearly establish that violence in movies and TV contribute to aggressive behavior in real life. On the other hand, there is no clear evidence that the programs that the kids watched on TV were violent in the first place. Even if we were to accept that TV watching contributed to the increased crime rate, it need not have been because of the nature of the programs. Perhaps, children who watched programs such as Adams and Samson, a funny sit-com about two blundering cops began perceiving all cops as incompetent.

What is the role of the sentences in boldface?

    [A]The first establishes a theory that the author later clearly refutes while the second presents the author's conclusion
    [B]The first is an interpretation made by researchers that the author contends against and the second provides an alternative explanation for statistical data
    [C]The first is an opinion expressed by someone other than the author and which the author is completely in disagreement with while the second provides the reason for the author's doubt.
    [D] The first is a fact supporting the researcher's conclusion while the second is the author's conclusion.
    [E]The first is a clearly proven opinion even if the author disagrees with it while the second is an ambiguous opinion that has no supporting data.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Good, good Let the kudos flow through you

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 17 Mar 2015
Posts: 66
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Studies have established that children who watch [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2018, 14:06
Princ wrote:
Studies have established that children who watched 2 more hours of TV on an average daily basis during the first 15 years of their life were 50℅ more likely to be arrested for property crimes in the country. Researchers believe that these studies clearly establish that violence in movies and TV contribute to aggressive behavior in real life. On the other hand, there is no clear evidence that the programs that the kids watched on TV were violent in the first place. Even if we were to accept that TV watching contributed to the increased crime rate, it need not have been because of the nature of the programs. Perhaps, children who watched programs such as Adams and Samson, a funny sit-com about two blundering cops began perceiving all cops as incompetent.

What is the role of the sentences in boldface?

    [A]The first establishes a theory that the author later clearly refutes while the second presents the author's conclusion
    [B]The first is an interpretation made by researchers that the author contends against and the second provides an alternative explanation for statistical data
    [C]The first is an opinion expressed by someone other than the author and which the author is completely in disagreement with while the second provides the reason for the author's doubt.
    [D] The first is a fact supporting the researcher's conclusion while the second is the author's conclusion.
    [E]The first is a clearly proven opinion even if the author disagrees with it while the second is an ambiguous opinion that has no supporting data.


The first bold face is the researchers conclusion/interpretation. The author does not blatantly says that researchers conclusion is wrong. He shows other possibilities or interpretations from the same set of data. Thus option B is correct.


Please give Kudos if the reply helped you!!!!!!!!!!!!
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Oct 2017
Posts: 60
Re: Studies have established that children who watch [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2018, 18:04
1st bold face clearly states opinion of researcher ,which author does not agree and he gives an alternate explanation which is clearly stated in choice B.

A 2nd part is not conclusion
C wrong becuase as per C it support researcher argument whereas in actual it negates it.
D and E wrong as they are not fact just opinions.

Posted from my mobile device
Re: Studies have established that children who watch   [#permalink] 22 Apr 2018, 18:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Studies have established that children who watch

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.