Hi
avigutman AnthonyRitz - thank you so much for your inputs.
What both of you said in the posts just above make sense. - the book was definitely written AFTER 1165 (that cannot be disputable) - I did not make that inference. I understand the logic for this now
The only thing questionable is : was the text written PRIOR to 1167
While we are only left with (c) so we have to pick (c) -- however, would you agree on these inputs on (C) ?
-- Traditionally most GMAT assumptions are necessary assumptions. (C) seems to go over-board
Here is why :
(C) is is suggesting two things
(i) mom / dad / brother / sisters /grandmom / grand-dad / grand-mom / great grand mom / great grand-father / children / wives / cousins = EVERYONE IS
ALL listed accurately.
(ii)
LIVING / Deceased STATUS of EACH ONE is listed accurately
as well.(C) is suggesting
both the above bullet points.
However, I think only DAD and the
living /deceased status of DAD specifically is necessary for this argument.
If mom / brother / sister /grandmom .... is listed
incorrectly and
THE LIVING STATUS of mom / brother / sister / grandmom is listed in-accurately
as well --- it doesnt hurt the argument.
Thoughts ?