GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 14 Nov 2018, 01:04

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in November
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
Open Detailed Calendar
  • $450 Tuition Credit & Official CAT Packs FREE

     November 15, 2018

     November 15, 2018

     10:00 PM MST

     11:00 PM MST

    EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299)
  • Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

     November 17, 2018

     November 17, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Nov. 17, 7 AM PST. Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 352
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 01 Nov 2018, 23:56
6
56
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

65% (01:29) correct 35% (01:31) wrong based on 744 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:


(A) What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?

(B) To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?

(C) What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?

(D) How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?

(E) Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?


Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 54
Page: 138
Difficulty:


Verbal Question of The Day: Day 238: Critical Reasoning


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here

_________________

The only thing that matters is what you believe.


Originally posted by freetheking on 14 Jul 2006, 16:54.
Last edited by Bunuel on 01 Nov 2018, 23:56, edited 5 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Most Helpful Expert Reply
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2093
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: QOTD: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Mar 2018, 08:39
6
Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. The answer choices consist of questions that may or may not be important to research in determining the impact of that plan on Tanco's profits. Before diving into the answer choices, let's make sure we understand the plan and the rationale behind it:

  • Tanco uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides.
  • New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from preserving animal hides with salt. So if Tanco does not change their processes, their costs will increase significantly.
  • In order to avoid these increased costs, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. That way Tanco will avoid the costs of disposing of salt water.
  • But what about the disposal of the waste from potassium chloride use? Well, research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product (i.e. waste product) of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer.
  • Recycling the by-product to make crop fertilizer will leave only a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

Sounds great! Instead of paying the increased costs of salt water disposal, Tanco can switch to potassium chloride and recycle most of the by-products. In that case, Tanco will only have to dispose of a relatively small quantity of waste.

But will implementing this plan affect company profits? Any answer choice that addresses a possible impact to Tanco's profits should be eliminated.

Quote:
A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?

We know that Tanco's plan will allow the company to avoid the increased costs of salt water disposal. But will this plan increase costs in other ways? What if the amount of potassium chloride needed to preserve some quantity of hides costs much more than the amount of common salt needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?

Sure, Tanco will save on disposal costs, but the company will have to spend more on potassium chloride than it spent on common salt. If that cost increase is large enough, then the plan to switch to potassium chloride could actually have a negative effect on profits. Tanco would certainly want to research these amounts in determining the impact of the plan on company profits, so eliminate (A).

Quote:
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?

If some or all of the equipment involved when using common salt is NOT suitable when using potassium chloride, then Tanco may have to upgrade or replace that equipment. If these equipment changes are small, they may not be very costly. But Tanco might have to invest a substantial amount of money in equipment modifications before switching to potassium chloride. Depending on the amounts, this could significantly affect Tanco's profits.

In determine the impact of the plan on company profits, Tanco would want to research equipment compatibility. Eliminate (B).

Quote:
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?

Even if the potassium chloride by-products are reprocessed to yield a crop fertilizer, Tanco will have to dispose of a relatively small quantity of waste. The quantity of waste may be small, but how expensive is it to dispose of that waste? What if the environmental regulations on this waste make its disposal significantly expensive? How would those disposal costs compare to the increased salt water disposal costs?

Depending on the exact amounts, disposal of the small quantity of potassium chloride waste might be more expensive than the disposal of salt water, even after the new regulations are implemented. Tanco would certainly want to determine whether the company will face other regulations if the plan is implemented. This question would be important to research in determining the effect of the plan on Tanco's profits. Eliminate (C).

Quote:
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?

Even if using potassium chloride is the cheaper option, will it affect the characteristics of the leather? What if using potassium chloride results in leather that is significantly different than the leather produced using common salt? Such differences, if any, could affect the demand for and/or price of Tanco's products. This could certainly affect Tanco's profits. Choice (D) presents a question that is important to research, so eliminate (D).

Quote:
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?

As long as both substances have the same effect on the hides, the mechanisms by which they operate are not important. Perhaps the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides are significantly different than the chemical properties that make common salt an effective means for preserving animal hides.

So what? Are hides preserved using potassium chloride different than hides preserved using common salt? Knowing that the properties are different doesn't tell us whether the hides themselves will be different. Researching this question alone would not reveal potential differences in the hides or the resulting leathers.

Simply knowing whether the chemical properties are the same or different would not tell us anything about profits. Thus, this research is not important in determining the impact of the plan on company profits.

That makes (E) our answer.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | Instagram | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Most Helpful Community Reply
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2014
Posts: 98
Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2014, 19:32
5
2
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

Need to evaluate answer choices keeping cost in mind.
All the answer choices that directly affect cost are valid choices.


A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides? - Incorrect. Talks about cost.
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride? - Incorrect. If equipment is not reusable then it will increase cost.
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride? - Incorrect. This will again affect the cost.
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used? - Incorrect. if quality is not the same then this can hamper sale and profits
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so? - Correct. Chemical properties are not relevant here. The answer choice already says that potassium chloride is an effective means of preserving animal hides. So we are not concerned with what is the chemical composition as long as it does the job.
General Discussion
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1669
Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2006, 23:10
4
Will go with E .

The quality of leather, reuse of existing machines, constrsints on waste disposal and cost of using a different chemical all have some bearing onthe profits of the company.

The chemical properties involved need not be the same.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Posts: 47
Location: Korea, Republic of
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 08-16-2012
GPA: 3.05
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2012, 17:05
3
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?

I don't understand the OA.

If chemical properties are considered 'out of topic', isn't 'equipment' from (B) considered 'out of topic' as well?
If Potasium chloride's chemical properties don't work as effective as a common salt, wouldn't that decrease the profit? Because pottasium is not effective, the company should purchase more potassium?

Please help..
_________________

Luck is the additional surplus on the way to one's constant effort.

VP
VP
User avatar
G
Status: Top MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 1496
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: Q800 V740
Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2012, 23:30
3
uledssul,

The equipment from option (B) is relevant - it is important for the firm to determine if the equipment that they have been using with common salt will also work with potassium chloride. If it does not, then the company will have to spend more in fixing/upgrading/replacing the equipment.

On the other hand, for option (E), the similarity of the chemical properties that make potassium chloride effective with those that make common salt effective are irrelevant - what matters is whether those properties do the job, i.e. preserve animal hides. As long as this is being done, that is all that the manufacturer will care about.

The answer is therefore (E).
_________________

GyanOne | Top MBA Rankings and MBA Admissions Blog

Top MBA Admissions Consulting | Top MiM Admissions Consulting

Premium MBA Essay Review|Best MBA Interview Preparation|Exclusive GMAT coaching

Get a FREE Detailed MBA Profile Evaluation | Call us now +91 98998 31738

Director
Director
User avatar
B
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 512
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Feb 2015, 03:11
1
In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT --> So, we are looking for an argument which IS NOT IMPORTANT the impact of company profits.

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides? --> is important - PROFIT = Revenue - Costs
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride? --> it is important: if we can not use existing equipment = > COSTs
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride? --> regulations were the cause switch from salt --> potassium, so they are also important to consider in case of potassium (generated costs through regualations)
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used? --> Every company has a recognition value in its products, so if there are changes in quality, look etc IT is important for the company, as it can effect its profits
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so? --> CORRECT. IT is absolutely not important. This sentence says both methods are effective - so, it is irrelevant whether chemical properties are different or not.
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

Share some Kudos, if my posts help you. Thank you !

800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50
GMAT PREP 670
MGMAT CAT 630
KAPLAN CAT 660

Director
Director
User avatar
B
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 569
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jun 2016, 04:25
2

The answer is E


The question can be simplified as -What is NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT or LEAST IMPORTANT decision for Tanco when switching from NaCl (salt) to KCl (potassium chloride) ?

Lets analyse the options

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
Important:-What if cost of salt used by taco annually is only 1$ and Tanco annual profit is 100$ but the annual cost of buying potassium chloride is 100000$ ? Tanco would be either bankrupt or in heavy debt it it does not consider this option carefully.

B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
Important:-If the existing equipment can't work with potassium then then Tanco will have to buy new equipment. If taco's profit is 100$ and new equipment cost 200000$.Tanco would be either bankrupt or in heavy debt it it does not consider this option carefully.

C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
Important:- The whole switching is happening because of waste disposal. If potassium chloride creates waste that cannot be disposed, then again Tanco is in the same position it earlier was when using salt. Tanco will again have to switch machines, do research again to find another compatible chemical.

D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
Important:- After all Tanco is a leather manufacturer. What if potassium makes the new leather look like a fungus infested pizza or what if potassium makes the new leather melt in sunshine. would anyone buy a pair of leather shoe that melt or a leather jacket that vanishes .No.. Taco would not able to sell the leather.

E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?
NOT IMPORTANT:- This is least important. Why should Tanco worry about what kind of chemical reaction are going on between leather and potassium as long as the final product look like good leather, does not pollute, is cheap and versatile.
See this analogy :- You want to score 770/800 in GMAT. Does it matter whether you study in morning or in night as long as you can score 770.
Does it matter whether your teacher is from Moon-hater :-D or from Berry-toss :o or Keep-long :shock: as long as you are guaranteed to get 770.

SO the answer is E


Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?

_________________

Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly.
FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 468
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2017, 11:53
A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
Cost is imp factor to know
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
If the equipment used is not compatible with KCL ir potassium cloride then using KCl is not good, so important point
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
What regulations of waste product generated from using potassium cloride Kcl are for its disposal - if too stringent to dispose then also not good to use KCl => important point.
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
If there is considerable amount of variation in leather quality that Tanco makes => ie if potassium cloride is making the leather quality inferior by any amount or making superior by any amount is important to know => important point
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?

Comparing chemical properties of common salt and potassium chloride is useless- so this is the answer
_________________

Give Kudos for correct answer and/or if you like the solution.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Posts: 378
Re: QOTD: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Mar 2018, 23:06
I would go with option C, because "what are the environmental regulations"...does not affect the profit margins of the company, rest all will affect in one or the other way.

A. Talks about costs (will affect)

B. Equipments also affect as either it may save cost or if not suitable, equipments purchase cost would be involved.

C. "What environmental regulations constrain the disposal".... does not affect the profits in any way.

D. This talks about the quality and similarity of the leather(product), which is an important and contributing factor in profits.

E. Effective preserving is again related to quality of leather.

Thus, I would go with C.

Plzz correct me if I am wrong.



Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 21 Jun 2016
Posts: 6
Re: QOTD: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2018, 05:51
GOAL: eliminate statements that would directly link with company's profits(as written in question stem)

PROFITS=REVENUE-(CAPITAL INVESTMENT+OPERATING COST + REPROCESSING COST)

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal
hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
operating cost is involved so obviously it will affect the profits
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
Capital investment is involved . so obviously it will affect profits
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
cost of reprocessing . So profits would take a toll
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
Quality of material produced which is linked to revenues . So profit would take a toll
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?
chemical properties of the salt we dont need it .
OA: E
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Jun 2017
Posts: 49
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V27
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V34
GPA: 4
Re: QOTD: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Mar 2018, 06:48
E.

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
Incorrect. Has an obvious effect on the profitability of Tanco.

B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
Incorrect. If we can use the same equipment with potassium chloride as it was being used for common salt, it reduces their costs.

C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
Incorrect. If there are any environmental regulations that would affect the disposal, it might make it more costly for them to dump the potassium chloride, e.g. if there is a policy on very low amounts being dumped, then it increases their costs.

D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
Incorrect. If the consumer can notice the difference and does not like it, then it'll mean reduced revenues and so less profitability.

E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?
Correct. We don't care about the chemical properties. We only care if it does the job.
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 11 Feb 2015
Posts: 559
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: QOTD: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2018, 20:04
SonalSinha803 wrote:
I would go with option C, because "what are the environmental regulations"...does not affect the profit margins of the company, rest all will affect in one or the other way.

A. Talks about costs (will affect)

B. Equipments also affect as either it may save cost or if not suitable, equipments purchase cost would be involved.

C. "What environmental regulations constrain the disposal".... does not affect the profits in any way.

D. This talks about the quality and similarity of the leather(product), which is an important and contributing factor in profits.

E. Effective preserving is again related to quality of leather.

Thus, I would go with C.

Plzz correct me if I am wrong.



Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app


It is very important for Tanco to research Option C. Why is the company even considering replacing potassium chloride in place of common salt. Because of regulations, right? Option C says "What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?".

So imagine, "environmental regulations are not in favour of disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?". This would mean that the company cannot replace potassium chloride in place of common salt. It will have to look for another alternative then.

I hope this explanation helps you. There are other posts in this thread which explain why "E" is the correct answer for this question.

Please revert in case if you need more clarification!! All the best!!
_________________

"Please hit :thumbup: +1 Kudos if you like this post" :student_man:

_________________
Manish :geek:

"Only I can change my life. No one can do it for me"

GMAT Club Bot
Re: QOTD: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities &nbs [#permalink] 04 Jun 2018, 20:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.