Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:13 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:13
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
655-705 Level|   Assumption|         
User avatar
Will2020
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Last visit: 04 Mar 2022
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
51
Given Kudos: 1,120
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Fuqua '24 (A)
GPA: 3.2
WE:Consulting (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Fuqua '24 (A)
Posts: 135
Kudos: 51
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if 26 Dec 2019, 11:26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja Can you please help me out on this one? I didn't understand the argument pretty well about claims and expenses of an insurance policy paying out the income of another... Tks!
User avatar
aniket16c
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 20 Oct 2018
Last visit: 05 Feb 2024
Posts: 180
Own Kudos:
154
 [2]
Given Kudos: 57
Location: India
Schools: Ross '24 (D) Darden '24 (A)
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 4
Schools: Ross '24 (D) Darden '24 (A)
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 180
Kudos: 154
 [2]
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if 26 Dec 2019, 21:55
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if, over time, claims against it plus expenses associated with it exceed total income from premiums. But premium income can be invested and will then yield returns of its own. Therefore, an under priced policy does not represent a net loss in every case.

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?
Show more
Argument –
Profits to policy = Revenues – Cost
In this case revenue = income from premiums
Cost = Expenses + claims against the policy
The argument says that if revenues > cost  policy is in loss = policy is under-priced
However the premiums (=revenue) are reinvested further the reinvested premiums will yield returns that will compensate for the costs and provide the required profits. Thus under priced policy does not always represent net loss.
Here we are assuming that the premiums can be returned and there are no other obligations / the reinvested premiums can yield sufficient returns to compensate for the costs

(A) No insurance policies are deliberately under priced in order to attract customers to the insurance company offering such policies.
- Negate = few policies are under priced to attract customers. However, we cannot justify the reinvestment of premiums to generate profits.
- Wrong
(B) A policy that represents a net loss to the insurance company is not an under priced policy in every case.
- Policy that presents loss = under priced policy every time. This is exactly what the conclusion is saying. This does not contradict the conclusion. In some cases, the policy can represent the net loss and in some cases it cannot.
- Wrong
(C) There are policies for which the level of claims per year can be predicted with great accuracy before premiums are set.
- We can make an argument that if claims can be predicted then we can predict the reinvestment of premiums required to generate a profit. But do we really require to predict the premiums with “great accuracy”? A simple prediction of positive or negative returns can also work.
- However even if there aren’t any policies that can predict claims, the condition does not constradict the conclusion that premiums can be reinvested to generate profits
-Wrong
(D) The income earned by investing premium income is the most important determinant of an insurance company’s profits.
- There can be many determinants. It does not matter.
- Wrong

(E) The claims against at least some under priced policies do not require paying out all of the premium income from those policies as soon as it is earned.
-Negate: Every policy required paying out premium income.
- If premiums do require to be paid immediately, they cannot be invested. If they cannot be invested profit cannot be generated using investment of profits. In such a case, a under priced policy always represents a net loss
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if 18 Jan 2020, 09:36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Will2020
GMATNinjaCan you please help me out on this one? I didn't understand the argument pretty well about claims and expenses of an insurance policy paying out the income of another... Tks!
Show more
There are several posts here already that analyze the argument. Could we trouble you to elaborate on what you don't understand after reading through the rest of the thread?
User avatar
Will2020
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Last visit: 04 Mar 2022
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
51
Given Kudos: 1,120
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Fuqua '24 (A)
GPA: 3.2
WE:Consulting (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Fuqua '24 (A)
Posts: 135
Kudos: 51
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if 20 Jan 2020, 06:41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Will2020
GMATNinjaCan you please help me out on this one? I didn't understand the argument pretty well about claims and expenses of an insurance policy paying out the income of another... Tks!
There are several posts here already that analyze the argument. Could we trouble you to elaborate on what you don't understand after reading through the rest of the thread?
Show more

GMATNinja After some rereading, I understood the question. It was more a vocabulary than an assessment issue of the argument. Tks anyway! :)
User avatar
goaltop30mba
User avatar
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2025
Posts: 188
Own Kudos:
68
Given Kudos: 407
Posts: 188
Kudos: 68
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if 06 Feb 2021, 16:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I may/may not be right regarding the option B.

Notice what conclusion says. It says —“an underpriced policy does not represent a net loss in every case”. Notice that the author has taken into account that a policy can be underpriced and not leading to a loss. What I am saying is that the author knows that if a policy is underpriced, it can either lead to/represent a loss or doesn’t lead to/represent a loss.

Now look at option B. If we negate option B, we get — “a policy that represents a loss to the insurance company is an underpriced policy in every case”. Does the negated statement really destroy the conclusion? No right? As explained above, author already has taken into account, in other words, negated statement is basically what is already there in the conclusion. Had the negated statement been something like this—“ only the policies that represent a net loss to the insurance company in every case are considered underpriced”. This statement would certainly have weakened the argument— if only the policies that represent loss in every case are considered underpriced, then such policies must represent a net loss in every case, so then how can the author say that underpriced policy does not represent a net loss in every case?

PS: above mentioned analysis is just my take on option B. I may be wrong/ I may not be wrong, so if any expert feels that my analysis is incomplete or incorrect, please feel free to correct me :)

Regards,

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Krishnahelps
User avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2020
Last visit: 10 Sep 2025
Posts: 134
Own Kudos:
33
Given Kudos: 1,686
Schools: ISB '27 (A)
Schools: ISB '27 (A)
Posts: 134
Kudos: 33
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if 28 May 2021, 04:22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

One question, here the question says that underpriced policy does not represent a loss in every case, which means that in some cases it might and choice E says that at least some underpriced policies do not require paying out all of the premium at once. How do you deal with at least here? It will be really helpful if you can help me.

Thanks in advance!
User avatar
Fdambro294
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 20 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,350
Own Kudos:
741
Given Kudos: 1,656
Posts: 1,350
Kudos: 741
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if 28 May 2021, 21:06
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bumping this response ......down, I guess?

Perfect analysis.

D is one of those answers that might become troublesome if you don’t understand the purpose behind the “negation test” and why it is used.

Although it is a stretch, you could say that D slightly strengthens the claim that there are at least a few underpriced policies that do not represent a net loss. These types of answers that seem to strengthen the argument, but are not absolutely essential assumptions, can be the hardest to eliminate.

When you negate any answer that might strengthen the conclusion or that is at least in line with the conclusion, the conclusion will appear to weaken. You always need to step back and think the following in any find the assumption type questions: if I throw this answer out, can the author still use the supporting facts to make a conclusion that makes sense?

Stepping back and thinking about D: does the author absolutely have to assume that the investment income earned is the MOST important determinant of the company’s profits?

The author still has the supporting fact that there is this income coming in to offset and overcome the expenses associated with the policy. Even if the investment income is NOT the most important aspect, it is still income that can be used to offset the underpriced policy’s expenses. Even as a small determinant of the company’s profits, the investment income earned could be enough to conclude that not every underpriced policy is a net loss.

The author isn’t required to assume that it is the most important determinant of the company’s profits for the facts to support his conclusion.

Just having the investment income be enough to overcome the expenses in some of the underpriced policy cases is enough to conclude that not all these policies represent net loses.

D is wrong.


E is essentially telling us that there are at least a few policies in which the investment earnings do not have to be given to the policy holder.

If the author does not assume answer E, then it is the case that all of the investment income earned is not kept by the insurance company.

In such a case, anytime a policy is undervalued, the company does not have any investment income to offset these kinds of undervalued policies. The conclusion could never be true! There wouldn’t even even be a single case in which an undervalued policy makes the company money or breaks even.

E is essential to the argument. Without E being true, the facts do not support what the author claims.


BrentGMATPrepNow
nitya34
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if, over time, claims against it plus expenses associated with it exceed total income from premiums. But premium income can be invested and will then yield returns of its own. Therefore, an under priced policy does not represent a net loss in every case.

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) No insurance policies are deliberately under priced in order to attract customers to the insurance company offering such policies.

(B) A policy that represents a net loss to the insurance company is not an under priced policy in every case.

(C) There are policies for which the level of claims per year can be predicted with great accuracy before premiums are set.

(D) The income earned by investing premium income is the most important determinant of an insurance company’s profits.

(E) The claims against at least some under priced policies do not require paying out all of the premium income from those policies as soon as it is earned.

I had a student ask me to explain why D is wrong.

Argument rewording:
Policy is under priced if (claims + associated expenses) is greater than income from premiums.
However, a company can make money by investing income from a particular premium, which means an under priced policy does not necessarily represent a net loss.
Conclusion: an under priced policy does not necessarily represent a net loss.

Let's apply the NEGATION technique to D and E.

(D) The income earned by investing premium income is the NOT most important determinant of an insurance company’s profits.
Does this destroy the conclusion that an under priced policy does not necessarily represent a net loss?
No.
ELIMINATE D.

(E) The claims against ALL under priced policies REQUIRE paying out all of the premium income from those policies as soon as it is earned.
Does this destroy the conclusion that an under priced policy does not necessarily represent a net loss?
Yes!
If you must pay out all of the premium income from those policies, then you can't offset the losses.

Answer: E

Cheers,
Brent
Show more

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Basshead
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Last visit: 07 Feb 2024
Posts: 925
Own Kudos:
302
Given Kudos: 432
Location: United States
Posts: 925
Kudos: 302
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if 21 Sep 2021, 09:57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The question asks for an assumption but we can think of this question as a must be true problem. A quick glance at the answer choices shows that many use strong language (in bold):

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?

Quote:
(A) No insurance policies are deliberately underpriced in order to attract customers to the insurance company offering such policies.
Show more

Do we know that none of the insurance polices are deliberately underpriced in order to attract customers to the insurance company offering such policies? We don't. A is out.

Quote:
(B) A policy that represents a net loss to the insurance company is not an underpriced policy in every case.
Show more

Do we know that a policy that represents a net loss to the insurance company is not an underpriced policy in every case It's certainly possible that all policies that represent a net loss are underpriced policies. B is out.

Quote:
(C) There are policies for which the level of claims per year can be predicted with great accuracy before premiums are set.
Show more

This doesn't have to be true -- perhaps we can't predict any claims with great accuracy.

Quote:
(D) The income earned by investing premium income is the most important determinant of an insurance company’s profits.
Show more

Do we know the income earned by investing premium income is the most important determinant of an insurance company’s profits? Maybe there is another determinant that is more important! D is out.

Quote:
(E) The claims against at least some underpriced policies do not require paying out all of the premium income from those policies as soon as it is earned.
Show more

CORRECT. If we're concluding an underpriced policy does not represent a net loss in every case, then we need to use the premium income in order to invest. To be able to do this, we can't pay out all the premium income immediately as soon as it is earned.

E is the answer.
avatar
krittapat
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 23 Oct 2019
Last visit: 27 Jan 2023
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 3,513
Location: Thailand
Schools: Ross '24 (M)
Schools: Ross '24 (M)
Posts: 44
Kudos: 3
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if 15 Nov 2021, 04:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma mikemcgarry egmat
Could you please help explain why option B is incorrect?
I was hesitating between B and E.
Thanks for your help.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,292
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,292
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if 25 Nov 2021, 04:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
krittapat
VeritasKarishma mikemcgarry egmat
Could you please help explain why option B is incorrect?
I was hesitating between B and E.
Thanks for your help.
Show more

Conclusion and Assumptions need different logical pre-thinking. (B) in this question can work logically as Conclusion but not as an assumption. An assumption asks us to find something which the author has formulated or based on before the writing up of the argument, conclusion is the logical result of the argument.

Thank you
User avatar
TargetKellogg2024
User avatar
MBA Section Director
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Last visit: 13 Nov 2025
Posts: 442
Own Kudos:
732
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: Germany
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V36
GMAT 2: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V37
GRE 1: Q170 V163
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V37
GRE 1: Q170 V163
Posts: 442
Kudos: 732
 [1]
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if 05 Jul 2023, 15:45
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Technically a given category of insurance policy is underpriced if, over time, claims against it plus expenses associated with it exceed total income from premiums. But premium income can be invested and will then yield returns of its own. Therefore, an underpriced policy does not represent a net loss in every case.

Analysis: Case when claim+expenses > premium then policy is underpriced. However, premium income accrues interest, therefore, an underpriced policy does not necessarily represent a net loss

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) No insurance policies are deliberately underpriced in order to attract customers to the insurance company offering such policies.
Negation: At least some insurance policies are deliberately underpriced to attract customers
Analysis: So what? The argument is speaking about the financial aspect of the underpriced policy, not in terms of secondary gains. Discard.

(B) A policy that represents a net loss to the insurance company is not an underpriced policy in every case.
The classic trap answer choice. If the argument says If X then Y, this trap answer type says if not X then not Y. This is not necessarily true. Discard.

(C) There are policies for which the level of claims per year can be predicted with great accuracy before premiums are set.
Whether or not the level of claims can be predicted just suggests to us whether or not it could be predicted if the policy is underpriced or not. It does not relate underpriced policy with a net loss. Discard.

(D) The income earned by investing premium income is the most important determinant of an insurance company’s profits.
Let's say it is not the most important determinant, but it is still a determinant. It can still help us draw the same conclusion from the argument. Discard.

(E) The claims against at least some underpriced policies do not require paying out all of the premium income from those policies as soon as it is earned.
 Negation: The claim against at least some underpriced policies requires paying out all of the premium income from the policies as soon as it is earned
Analysis: If the negation is true, the insurance company can't invest the premium income and therefore can't earn the interest. Therefore, the conclusion falls apart.

Therefore, E is the correct answer.
User avatar
Raman109
User avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
170
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 805
Kudos: 170
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if 25 Sep 2023, 10:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Technically a given category of insurance policy is underpriced if, over time, claims against it plus expenses associated with it exceed total income from premiums. But premium income can be invested and will then yield returns of its own. Therefore, an underpriced policy does not represent a net loss in every case.

The assumption is that we'll get time to invest in a policy to generate an additional return. What if the premium income can't be invested? Is there any case when a premium can not be invested - when whatever premium the insurance company earns, they have to return that in the form of a claim?
Another way of looking at it is
An underpriced policy doesn't represent a net loss in every case BECAUSE of additional yield on returns HOW by investing a premium income. Is there anything in this chain that can weaken the conclusion? Yes. What if we can't invest? So, we have to shield the conclusion against this information. How - that's what option E does. It rules out the case that can weaken the conclusion.

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) No insurance policies are deliberately underpriced in order to attract customers to the insurance company offering such policies. - Out of scope. Whether they are deliberately underpriced or not, we don't care.

(B) A policy that represents a net loss to the insurance company is not an underpriced policy in every case. - Yes, there can be other cases as well. We don't have to assume that this is the only case. Distortion.

(C) There are policies for which the level of claims per year can be predicted with great accuracy before premiums are set. - We are not concerned about those policies. Here, we are concerned about policies in which we get to know whether they made a profit or not, later. Out of scope.

(D) The income earned by investing premium income is the most important determinant of an insurance company’s profits. - Company's profits in general are out of scope.

(E) The claims against at least some underpriced policies do not require paying out all of the premium income from those policies as soon as it is earned. - This shields the argument against a possible weakener. Per our pre-thinking.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,836
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,836
Kudos: 986
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if 11 Nov 2025, 20:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts