Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
15 Oct 2025, 05:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
The 60-Second Technique That Cuts Your DI Time in Half—Without Doing More Math
Four and a half minutes. That's how long it takes to bomb a 2-minute DI question.
Not because you can't read charts. Not because you can't do math. But because you're processing data instead of understanding it.
Here's what nobody tells you about Data Insights: The more you calculate, the worse you perform.
The Root Problem: You're Acting Like a Calculator, Not a Business Professional
Let us show you EXACTLY what's happening. Here's a typical Table Analysis question:
You see a table with 10 salespeople and these columns:
Question: "How many salespeople had increasing sales in every consecutive quarter?"
Now watch what happens...
❌ What You're Doing Now:
"Okay, 'increasing sales in every consecutive quarter'... so I need Q1 < Q2 < Q3 < Q4 for each person. Let me check row by row..."
Sarah:
Q1 = $45K, Q2 = $52K → went up ✓
Q2 = $52K, Q3 = $48K → went DOWN ✗
Sarah is out.
Mike:
Q1 = $38K, Q2 = $43K → up ✓
Q2 = $43K, Q3 = $49K → up ✓
Q3 = $49K, Q4 = $51K → up ✓
Mike works! That's 1 person.
Lisa:
Q1 = $47K, Q2 = $48K → up ✓
Wait, is that actually up or just flat? Let me check... yes, $1K up ✓
Q2 = $48K, Q3 = $49K → up ✓
Q3 = $49K, Q4 = $53K → up ✓
Lisa works! That's 2 people.
[Still have MORE PEOPLE to check... getting tired... Was Lisa the second one or was there someone else? Let me recount... wait, did I check David correctly? Let me go back...]
Result: 4+ minutes later. You're exhausted. You've checked 40+ number comparisons. You've lost track twice and had to recount. And you're only 70% confident in your answer.
✅ What THE RIGHT APPROACH tells you to do:
Spend 60 seconds BEFORE reading the question
"This is quarterly sales data for 10 salespeople. Let me understand what's happening here..."
Scan the data holistically, not row by row
"Interesting patterns... Most people are pretty erratic - some quarters up, some down. I see a few with really high totals - Sarah, Mike, Jennifer are the top performers. But looking at the quarter-to-quarter movement... most people are bouncing around. There's clearly summer slumps hitting some people hard in Q3. Q4 looks strong across the board - holiday season, probably."
"But I notice something: Only a couple of people show that smooth, steady climb pattern. Mike's numbers go steadily up - I can see it at a glance: 38, 43, 49, 51. Almost nobody else has that steady progression. Most have at least one quarter where they dip."
Draw key conclusion/s
"There's basically two types here: volatile performers (most people) and steady climbers (just a few)."
NOW reads the question: "How many salespeople had increasing sales in every consecutive quarter?"
"Oh! They want the steady climbers - no dips allowed. From my scan, I already know most people are erratic. I spotted Mike immediately - he's the obvious steady climber. Let me verify him: 38→43→49→51, yes. Anyone else look that smooth? Patricia caught my eye... let me check her: 41→44→46→49, yes, she works too. Tom looked promising but no, he had that Q3 dip I noticed. Anyone else? Quick scan... nope, everyone else has at least one down quarter."
Answer: 2 people.
Result: 1.5 minutes total. No exhaustion. 95% confidence. You could explain exactly why it's 2 if someone asked.
See The Difference?
Wrong way:
Right way:
You weren't slower because you're bad at math. You were slower because you never understood what you were looking at.
The Transformation: From Data Processor to Data Owner
The difference isn't speed. It's understanding.
Students who bomb DI questions are DATA PROCESSORS:
Students who ace DI questions are DATA OWNERS:
This is exactly what "owning the dataset" means. And it's teachable.
The Bottom Line: Why This Changes Everything
Data Insights isn't testing whether you can count bars or calculate percentages.
It's testing whether you can extract meaning from data.
In business school, professors won't ask "how many salespeople are in this table?" They'll ask:
They want you to own the dataset, understand what it means, and make informed decisions. The GMAT is practicing for that reality.
The transformation happens the moment you stop solving and start seeing.
The Moment of Truth
The next DI question you see: Prove it to yourself.
Cover the questions. Set a 60-second timer. Just understand.
You'll feel the difference immediately.
Stop solving. Start seeing. The questions answer themselves.
Four and a half minutes. That's how long it takes to bomb a 2-minute DI question.
Not because you can't read charts. Not because you can't do math. But because you're processing data instead of understanding it.
Here's what nobody tells you about Data Insights: The more you calculate, the worse you perform.
The Root Problem: You're Acting Like a Calculator, Not a Business Professional
Let us show you EXACTLY what's happening. Here's a typical Table Analysis question:
You see a table with 10 salespeople and these columns:
Question: "How many salespeople had increasing sales in every consecutive quarter?"
Now watch what happens...
❌ What You're Doing Now:
"Okay, 'increasing sales in every consecutive quarter'... so I need Q1 < Q2 < Q3 < Q4 for each person. Let me check row by row..."
Sarah:
Q1 = $45K, Q2 = $52K → went up ✓
Q2 = $52K, Q3 = $48K → went DOWN ✗
Sarah is out.
Mike:
Q1 = $38K, Q2 = $43K → up ✓
Q2 = $43K, Q3 = $49K → up ✓
Q3 = $49K, Q4 = $51K → up ✓
Mike works! That's 1 person.
Lisa:
Q1 = $47K, Q2 = $48K → up ✓
Wait, is that actually up or just flat? Let me check... yes, $1K up ✓
Q2 = $48K, Q3 = $49K → up ✓
Q3 = $49K, Q4 = $53K → up ✓
Lisa works! That's 2 people.
[Still have MORE PEOPLE to check... getting tired... Was Lisa the second one or was there someone else? Let me recount... wait, did I check David correctly? Let me go back...]
Result: 4+ minutes later. You're exhausted. You've checked 40+ number comparisons. You've lost track twice and had to recount. And you're only 70% confident in your answer.
✅ What THE RIGHT APPROACH tells you to do:
Spend 60 seconds BEFORE reading the question
"This is quarterly sales data for 10 salespeople. Let me understand what's happening here..."
Scan the data holistically, not row by row
"Interesting patterns... Most people are pretty erratic - some quarters up, some down. I see a few with really high totals - Sarah, Mike, Jennifer are the top performers. But looking at the quarter-to-quarter movement... most people are bouncing around. There's clearly summer slumps hitting some people hard in Q3. Q4 looks strong across the board - holiday season, probably."
"But I notice something: Only a couple of people show that smooth, steady climb pattern. Mike's numbers go steadily up - I can see it at a glance: 38, 43, 49, 51. Almost nobody else has that steady progression. Most have at least one quarter where they dip."
Draw key conclusion/s
"There's basically two types here: volatile performers (most people) and steady climbers (just a few)."
NOW reads the question: "How many salespeople had increasing sales in every consecutive quarter?"
"Oh! They want the steady climbers - no dips allowed. From my scan, I already know most people are erratic. I spotted Mike immediately - he's the obvious steady climber. Let me verify him: 38→43→49→51, yes. Anyone else look that smooth? Patricia caught my eye... let me check her: 41→44→46→49, yes, she works too. Tom looked promising but no, he had that Q3 dip I noticed. Anyone else? Quick scan... nope, everyone else has at least one down quarter."
Answer: 2 people.
Result: 1.5 minutes total. No exhaustion. 95% confidence. You could explain exactly why it's 2 if someone asked.
See The Difference?
Wrong way:
- Compare 40 individual numbers
- Check each person sequentially without context
- Get lost, recount, doubt yourself
- 4+ minutes, 70% confidence
Right way:
- Spot the pattern (most erratic, few steady)
- Identify the likely candidates immediately
- Verify only the 2-3 that matter
- 1.5 minutes, 95% confidence
You weren't slower because you're bad at math. You were slower because you never understood what you were looking at.
The Transformation: From Data Processor to Data Owner
The difference isn't speed. It's understanding.
Students who bomb DI questions are DATA PROCESSORS:
- They see charts as puzzles to decode
- They hunt for numbers the question asks about
- They calculate frantically hoping to stumble on the answer
- They treat every data point as equally important
Students who ace DI questions are DATA OWNERS:
- They see charts as workplace scenarios they need to manage
- They understand the situation before being asked about it
- They know which patterns matter before calculating
- They identify the signal in the noise
This is exactly what "owning the dataset" means. And it's teachable.
The Bottom Line: Why This Changes Everything
Data Insights isn't testing whether you can count bars or calculate percentages.
It's testing whether you can extract meaning from data.
In business school, professors won't ask "how many salespeople are in this table?" They'll ask:
- "What does this sales pattern reveal about our go-to-market strategy?"
- "Where are the operational bottlenecks in this project timeline?"
- "What does this data suggest about our competitive position?"
They want you to own the dataset, understand what it means, and make informed decisions. The GMAT is practicing for that reality.
The transformation happens the moment you stop solving and start seeing.
The Moment of Truth
The next DI question you see: Prove it to yourself.
Cover the questions. Set a 60-second timer. Just understand.
You'll feel the difference immediately.
Stop solving. Start seeing. The questions answer themselves.
31 Oct 2025, 07:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hilarious thing is that your final answer is wrong, it's three people: Mike, Lisa, and Patricia
