Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Updated on: 18 Nov 2023, 05:32
Originally posted by Sajjad1994 on 11 Feb 2021, 07:30.
Last edited by BottomJee on 18 Nov 2023, 05:32, edited 3 times in total.
Last edited by BottomJee on 18 Nov 2023, 05:32, edited 3 times in total.
Moved to new forum
Kudos
Bookmarks
In 2007, the labor force participation rate was twice as high for South Dakota as for the United States as a whole.: Cannot be concluded
More South Dakotans were members of the labor force in 2007 than in 2006.: Cannot be concluded
For the years 2002 through 2008, South Dakota had a higher labor force participation rate than did the United States.: Can be concluded
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
60% (01:36) correct
40%
(01:42)
wrong
based on 1415
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Based on the graph, please answer the questions that follow.
1. Which of the following conclusions can be logically drawn from the graph above?
Attachment:
6.jpg [ 63.85 KiB | Viewed 8915 times ]
| Can be concluded | Cannot be concluded | |
| In 2007, the labor force participation rate was twice as high for South Dakota as for the United States as a whole. | ||
| More South Dakotans were members of the labor force in 2007 than in 2006. | ||
| For the years 2002 through 2008, South Dakota had a higher labor force participation rate than did the United States. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
In 2007, the labor force participation rate was twice as high for South Dakota as for the United States as a whole.: Cannot be concluded
More South Dakotans were members of the labor force in 2007 than in 2006.: Cannot be concluded
For the years 2002 through 2008, South Dakota had a higher labor force participation rate than did the United States.: Can be concluded
rocky620
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Nov 2018
Last visit: 11 May 2023
Posts: 481
Given Kudos: 229
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: IIMA PGPX'22 IIMB EPGP'22 IIMC PGPEX'22 ISB'22
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V22
WE:Other (Retail: E-commerce)
15 Feb 2021, 06:13
Kudos
Bookmarks
Which of the following conclusions can be logically drawn from the graph above?
In 2007, the labor force participation rate was twice as high for South Dakota as for the United States as a whole.....Cannot Be Concluded
Labor force participation rate in 2007, of:
South Dakota ~ 73.5%
United States ~ 66%
The difference is only 7.5%
More South Dakotans were members of the labor force in 2007 than in 2006.....Cannot Be Concluded
Since the data represents percentages and not the absolute values it cannot be concluded.
For the years 2002 through 2008, South Dakota had a higher labor force participation rate than did the United States......Can Be Concluded
Labor force participation rate from 2002-2008, of:
South Dakota is always greater than 72%
United States is always below 61.5%
In 2007, the labor force participation rate was twice as high for South Dakota as for the United States as a whole.....Cannot Be Concluded
Labor force participation rate in 2007, of:
South Dakota ~ 73.5%
United States ~ 66%
The difference is only 7.5%
More South Dakotans were members of the labor force in 2007 than in 2006.....Cannot Be Concluded
Since the data represents percentages and not the absolute values it cannot be concluded.
For the years 2002 through 2008, South Dakota had a higher labor force participation rate than did the United States......Can Be Concluded
Labor force participation rate from 2002-2008, of:
South Dakota is always greater than 72%
United States is always below 61.5%
15 Mar 2022, 10:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Explanation
The first conclusion cannot be drawn, as while the relative heights of the bars may look like one is twice as large as the other, the scale at the left-hand side of the graph should show that it is a much more modest difference than double (75% vs. 65%).
The second conclusion cannot be drawn, as given a percentage/rate but no link to actual numbers we cannot draw an inference about actual numbers (suppose the state's population changed dramatically from one year to the next, the slight difference in percentage would be overwhelmed by the dramatic difference in overall number).
The third conclusion, however, is valid, as the graph clearly depicts labor force participation, the specific language of the question.
Answer: Cannot be concluded, Cannot be concluded and Can be concluded
The first conclusion cannot be drawn, as while the relative heights of the bars may look like one is twice as large as the other, the scale at the left-hand side of the graph should show that it is a much more modest difference than double (75% vs. 65%).
The second conclusion cannot be drawn, as given a percentage/rate but no link to actual numbers we cannot draw an inference about actual numbers (suppose the state's population changed dramatically from one year to the next, the slight difference in percentage would be overwhelmed by the dramatic difference in overall number).
The third conclusion, however, is valid, as the graph clearly depicts labor force participation, the specific language of the question.
Answer: Cannot be concluded, Cannot be concluded and Can be concluded
