Last visit was: 12 Jul 2025, 07:05 It is currently 12 Jul 2025, 07:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
NinetyFour
Joined: 22 Sep 2018
Last visit: 22 Dec 2019
Posts: 188
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 78
Posts: 188
Kudos: 206
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
emcheeks
Joined: 28 Jun 2020
Last visit: 22 Dec 2024
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 78
Posts: 119
Kudos: 108
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
anshul0130
Joined: 11 Oct 2020
Last visit: 26 Jan 2023
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 50
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 12 Jul 2025
Posts: 5,143
Own Kudos:
4,729
 [2]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,143
Kudos: 4,729
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PanpaliaAnshul
ExpertsGlobal5 - Can you pls review my approach to this question ?

The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting.

(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(B) quota, having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(E) quota, not one that reflected that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment

Option A is wrong for parallelism error. As per option A, quota with no commitment to minority hiring and quota with no commitment to eventually promoting. To eventually promoting don't make sense.
Option B is wrong for modifier reason. In option B having modifies subject of previous clause i.e. "SHE"
Option C is correct as elements are parallel. As per option C, quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and quota and did not reflect a commitment to eventual promotion
Option D is wrong for modifier reason. In option D reflecting modifies subject of previous clause i.e. "SHE". Can you pls confirm if NOT is an adverb here ?
sentence is not structured in option E

Hello PanpaliaAnshul,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your queries, your analysis is largely correct.

However, it would be more accurate to describe the error in Option E along the lines of "not one that reflected that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment" incorrectly modifying "affirmative action quota".

Further, "not" is indeed an adverb in Option D because "reflecting" is a present participle ("verb+ing") that serves as an adjective.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 12 Jul 2025
Posts: 5,143
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,143
Kudos: 4,729
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
tarek99
The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting.


(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting

(B) quota, having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting

(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion

(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion

(E) quota, not one that reflected that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment


Meaning is crucial to solving this problem:
Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended meaning of the crucial part of this sentence is that the law firm's offer was meant merely to fill an affirmative action, and it did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion.

Concepts tested here: Meaning + Parallelism

• In a “noun + comma + phrase” construction, the phrase must correctly modify the noun; this is one of the most frequently tested concepts on GMAT sentence correction.
• The introduction of present participle ("verb+ing"- “having” in this case) after comma generally leads to a cause-effect relationship.
• Any elements linked by conjunction ("and" in this sentence) must be parallel.

A:
1/ This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "quota with no commitment to minority hiring"; the construction of this phrase illogically implies that the affirmative action quota had no commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion; the intended meaning is that the law firm's offer had no commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion.
2/ Option A fails to maintain parallelism between the gerund (noun) "hiring" and the verb "promoting"; remember, any elements linked by conjunction ("and" in this sentence) must be parallel.

B:
1/ This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "having no commitment"; the use of the "comma + present participle ("verb+ing" - "having" in this sentence)" construction incorrectly implies that the law firm's offer was meant merely to fill an affirmative action, because it did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion; the intended meaning is that the law firm's offer was meant merely to fill an affirmative action, and as a separate action it did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion; remember, the introduction of present participle ("verb+ing"- “having” in this case) after comma generally leads to a cause-effect relationship.
2/ Option B fails to maintain parallelism between the gerund (noun) "hiring" and the verb "promoting"; remember, any elements linked by conjunction ("and" in this sentence) must be parallel.

C: Correct.
1/ This answer choice uses the phrase "and did not reflect", avoiding the modifier errors seen in Options B, D, and E and conveying the intended meaning - that the law firm's offer was meant merely to fill an affirmative action, and as a separate action it did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion.
2/ Option C maintains parallelism between the gerund (noun) "hiring" and the noun "promotion".
3/ Option C is free of any awkwardness or redundancy.

D: Trap.
1/ This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "not reflecting a commitment"; the use of the "comma + present participle ("verb+ing" - "having" in this sentence)" construction incorrectly implies that the law firm's offer was meant merely to fill an affirmative action, because it did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion; the intended meaning is that the law firm's offer was meant merely to fill an affirmative action, and as a separate action it did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion; remember, the introduction of present participle ("verb+ing"- “having” in this case) after comma generally leads to a cause-effect relationship.

E:
1/ This answer choice incorrectly modifies "quota" with "not one that reflected...commitment", incorrectly implying that the affirmative action quota had no commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion; the intended meaning is that the law firm's offer had no commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion; remember, in a “noun + comma + phrase” construction, the phrase must correctly modify the noun.
2/ Option E uses the needlessly wordy and indirect phrase "that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.

Hence, C is the best answer choice.

To understand the concept of "Phrase Comma Subject" and "Subject Comma Phrase" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):



To understand the concept of "Comma Plus Present Participle for Cause-Effect Relationship", you may want to watch the following video (~2 minutes):



All the best!
Experts' Global Team
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts