Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 17:39 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 17:39
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
trulyblessed
User avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2005
Last visit: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
53
 [37]
Posts: 70
Kudos: 53
 [37]
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu Updated on: 16 May 2019, 07:50
Originally posted by trulyblessed on 14 Sep 2005, 02:00.
Last edited by Bunuel on 16 May 2019, 07:50, edited 3 times in total.
Edited the question.
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
36
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

59% (01:22) correct 41% (01:30) wrong based on 1144 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to reduce, in order to comprehend, the nearly infinite amount of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment.


(A) a means to reduce, in order to comprehend, the nearly infinite amount

(B) a means to reduce, in order to comprehend, the nearly infinite number

(C) the means of reducing for comprehending the nearly infinite number

(D) the means that reduces, in order to comprehend, the nearly infinite amount

(E) the means for reducing in order to comprehend the nearly infinite amount
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
B
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,417
 [16]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,417
 [16]
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 21 Mar 2017, 03:38
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Stimulus is the singular word for the plural 'stimuli'. As a thumb rule, all plurals are countable.
General Discussion
User avatar
GMATT73
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
1,256
 [1]
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,256
 [1]
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 14 Sep 2005, 02:19
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It's B right? I attacked it from the other end. guess stimuli is countable.
User avatar
trulyblessed
User avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2005
Last visit: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
53
Posts: 70
Kudos: 53
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 14 Sep 2005, 02:22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATT73, between A and B, how did you determine that stimuli is countable? Or is this just common knowledge?

GMATT73
It's B right? I attacked it from the other end. guess stimuli is countable.
Show more
User avatar
GMATT73
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
1,256
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,256
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 14 Sep 2005, 02:32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Stimuli can be broken down, categorized, labeled, and archived = countable.
User avatar
macca
User avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Last visit: 01 Sep 2008
Posts: 166
Own Kudos:
56
 [2]
Location: London
Posts: 166
Kudos: 56
 [2]
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 14 Sep 2005, 03:16
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yes, stimulus is in fact a countable noun.

what got me thinking about amount was the word infinite but is should be
number of stimuli
avatar
Boomshockalocka
avatar
Joined: 07 May 2018
Last visit: 28 Dec 2018
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
4
 [4]
Location: United States
Schools: Sloan (MIT)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.69
Schools: Sloan (MIT)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 5
Kudos: 4
 [4]
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 10 Jul 2018, 06:00
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If you cannot determine whether it is countable or uncountable, look for clues in the part that's not underlined in the sentence. In this question, we have "reach", which is for plural. Hence we can see that "stimuli" is plural in this sentence. Hope that helps :)
avatar
Mankodim
avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2018
Last visit: 26 Apr 2019
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
14
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 25
Kudos: 14
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 27 Aug 2018, 09:46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, can a moderator add underline? It was a bit tough to understand the question without it.

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
Mankodim
avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2018
Last visit: 26 Apr 2019
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
14
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 25
Kudos: 14
 [1]
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 27 Aug 2018, 09:47
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, can a moderator add underline? It was a bit tough to understand the question without it.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 18 Jul 2025
Posts: 5,937
Own Kudos:
5,326
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,937
Kudos: 5,326
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 27 Aug 2018, 11:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mankodim
Hi, can a moderator add underline? It was a bit tough to understand the question without it.

Posted from my mobile device
Show more
Done that, thanks for pointing out KUDOS added.
User avatar
Helium
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Last visit: 01 Jun 2020
Posts: 454
Own Kudos:
808
Given Kudos: 118
Location: France
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE:Consulting (Other)
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
Posts: 454
Kudos: 808
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 27 Aug 2018, 17:42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to reduce, in order to comprehend, the nearly infinite amount of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment.

I have a question here...

Why comma is required between
...comprehend,the nearly....

Can someone explain modifiers in the sentence and what is it modifying?

a)a means to reduce
b)the nearly infinite amount of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment

daagh GMATNinja generis

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,273
Own Kudos:
37,384
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9,464
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,273
Kudos: 37,384
 [2]
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 29 Aug 2018, 19:34
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Harshgmat
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to reduce, in order to comprehend, the nearly infinite amount of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment.

I have a question here...

Why comma is required between
...comprehend,the nearly....

Can someone explain modifiers in the sentence and what is it modifying?

a)a means to reduce
b)the nearly infinite amount of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment

daagh GMATNinja generis
Show more
Harshgmat , this sentence is well-written and very complicated in grammar lingo. I can understand why you are curious about it! :-)

I have never seen punctuation this sophisticated tested by GMAC in ANY OG question.*

The commas before and after "in order to comprehend" are needed to indicate that we are shifting for a moment to insert a SEMI-parenthetical explanation.

A true "parenthetical aside": Professor Melnyk, of course, laughed at the student's funny comment.
A true aside in the middle of an expression is always set off by two commas and can be removed from the sentence without altering its meaning.

The phrase "in order to comprehend" is a bit more than a parenthetical aside. Removing the phrase changes the meaning. But the phrase does interrupt.

Let's try the sentence without the commas.

The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to reduce in order to comprehend the nearly infinite number of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment.

To reduce WHAT? Without a comma, we have no indication that "in order to comprehend" is an interruption (is a shift in THOUGHT and LOGIC). At that point, "to reduce" looks as if it has no direct object or a very elusive one.

Without a boatload of jargon and a sentence diagram, the best way to explain all the commas is this: if there is a distinct shift in the sentence, thought process, or logic, use a comma.

The phrase "in order to comprehend" and its commas indicate that we are interrupting the flow of the sentence to explain why the brain must first reduce the nearly infinite number of stimuli.

So we need a comma before and after "in order to comprehend":

1) to signal that the preceding verb "to reduce" is connected to the direct object "number," which immediately follows "comprehend"; and

2) to indicate that we are interrupting a verb phrase to explain WHY the brain needs to reduce the number of stimuli. That's a shift in thought.

Finally, the commas clarify meaning. The sentence is a bit unorthodox. Good prose often is unorthodox.

Are you confused by the meaning of the sentence?

Below is a very ugly version of the meaning of this sentence. Words in brackets indicate exactly that which the commas suggest without saying a word. I would rather read the sentence in the prompt (with the correct option B inserted).

MEANING:
The brain is [a type of] a stimulus reduction system.
[In other words, the brain is] a means to reduce the nearly infinite number of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment.
[The brain functions as a means to reduce the number of stimuli] in order to comprehend [a then-manageable number of] the stimuli.
Quote:
Can someone explain modifiers in the sentence and what is it modifying?
Show more
If I were to explain all the modifiers in this sentence, I would be writing for days.

The question doesn't test modifiers. It tests

-- countability: Stimuli can be counted. We can have an infinite NUMBER of stimuli.
Eliminate A, D, E

(C) the means of reducing for comprehending
--idiom: THE as a definite article in (C) ruins an otherwise idiomatic construction.

-- verbs: the verbs in this option make no sense. "Reducing" is a TRANSITIVE verb in participle form that needs an object. (Reducing WHAT?) "For comprehending" is not an object.
Eliminate C

Answer B

*Just to clear any concern that you or others may have -- punctuation this intricate would not be tested.
User avatar
Helium
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Last visit: 01 Jun 2020
Posts: 454
Own Kudos:
808
 [1]
Given Kudos: 118
Location: France
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE:Consulting (Other)
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
Posts: 454
Kudos: 808
 [1]
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 30 Aug 2018, 01:28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
generis
Harshgmat
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to reduce, in order to comprehend, the nearly infinite amount of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment.

I have a question here...

Why comma is required between
...comprehend,the nearly....

Can someone explain modifiers in the sentence and what is it modifying?

a)a means to reduce
b)the nearly infinite amount of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment

daagh GMATNinja generis
Harshgmat , this sentence is well-written and very complicated in grammar lingo. I can understand why you are curious about it! :-)

I have never seen punctuation this sophisticated tested by GMAC in ANY OG question.*

The commas before and after "in order to comprehend" are needed to indicate that we are shifting for a moment to insert a semi-parenthetical explanation. (Parenthetical asides in the middle of a dependent clause always have commas before and after them, but this phrase is a bit more than a parenthetical, which can be removed from the sentence without altering its meaning. The common aside "of course" is a parenthetical.)

Let's try the sentence without the comma.

The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to reduce in order to comprehend the nearly infinite number of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment.

To reduce WHAT? Without a comma, we have no indication that "in order to comprehend" is an interruption (is a THOUGHT and LOGIC shift).

At that point, "to reduce" looks as if it has no direct object, or a very complicated and elusive one.

Without a boatload of jargon and a sentence diagram, the best way to explain all the commas is this: if there is a distinct shift in the sentence, thought process, or logic, use a comma.

The phrase "in order to comprehend" indicates that we are interrupting the flow of the sentence to explain why the brain must first reduce the nearly infinite number of stimuli.

So we need a comma before and after "in order to comprehend":

1) to signal that the preceding verb "to reduce" is connected to the direct object "number," which immediately follows "comprehend"; and

2) to indicate that we are interrupting a verb phrase to explain why the brain needs to reduce the number of stimuli. That's a shift in thought.

Finally, the commas clarify meaning. The sentence is a bit unorthodox. Good prose often is unorthodox.

Are you confused by the meaning of the sentence?

Below is a very ugly version of the meaning of this sentence. Words in brackets indicate exactly that which the commas suggest without saying a word. I would rather read the sentence in the prompt (with the correct option B inserted).

MEANING:
The brain is [sort of] a stimulus reduction system.
[In other words, the brain is] a means to reduce the nearly infinite number of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment.
[The brain functions as a means to reduce the number of stimuli] in order to comprehend [what is then a manageable number of] the stimuli.
Quote:
Can someone explain modifiers in the sentence and what is it modifying?
If I were to explain all the modifiers in this sentence, I would be writing for days.

The question doesn't test modifiers. It tests

-- countability. Stimuli can be counted. An infinite NUMBER of...
Eliminate A, D, E

idiom - "THE" as a definite article ruins an otherwise idiomatic construction.
In addition, the verbs in this option make zero sense
Eliminate (C) the means of reducing for comprehending
Reducing is a TRANSITIVE verb in participle form that needs an object. "For comprehending" is not an object.

Answer B

*Just to clear any concern that you or others may have -- punctuation this intricate would not be tested.
Show more

generis

Thanks for very detailed and eloborate reply.

This will surely be very helpful to other members also.

Keep it up!!

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
avikroy
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
Last visit: 26 Mar 2020
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
34
 [1]
Given Kudos: 264
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.22
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 97
Kudos: 34
 [1]
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 20 May 2019, 00:14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
generis
Harshgmat
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to reduce, in order to comprehend, the nearly infinite amount of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment.

I have a question here...

Why comma is required between
...comprehend,the nearly....

Can someone explain modifiers in the sentence and what is it modifying?

a)a means to reduce
b)the nearly infinite amount of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment

daagh GMATNinja generis
Harshgmat , this sentence is well-written and very complicated in grammar lingo. I can understand why you are curious about it! :-)

I have never seen punctuation this sophisticated tested by GMAC in ANY OG question.*

The commas before and after "in order to comprehend" are needed to indicate that we are shifting for a moment to insert a SEMI-parenthetical explanation.

A true "parenthetical aside": Professor Melnyk, of course, laughed at the student's funny comment.
A true aside in the middle of an expression is always set off by two commas and can be removed from the sentence without altering its meaning.

The phrase "in order to comprehend" is a bit more than a parenthetical aside. Removing the phrase changes the meaning. But the phrase does interrupt.

Let's try the sentence without the commas.

The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to reduce in order to comprehend the nearly infinite number of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment.

To reduce WHAT? Without a comma, we have no indication that "in order to comprehend" is an interruption (is a shift in THOUGHT and LOGIC). At that point, "to reduce" looks as if it has no direct object or a very elusive one.

Without a boatload of jargon and a sentence diagram, the best way to explain all the commas is this: if there is a distinct shift in the sentence, thought process, or logic, use a comma.

The phrase "in order to comprehend" and its commas indicate that we are interrupting the flow of the sentence to explain why the brain must first reduce the nearly infinite number of stimuli.

So we need a comma before and after "in order to comprehend":

1) to signal that the preceding verb "to reduce" is connected to the direct object "number," which immediately follows "comprehend"; and

2) to indicate that we are interrupting a verb phrase to explain WHY the brain needs to reduce the number of stimuli. That's a shift in thought.

Finally, the commas clarify meaning. The sentence is a bit unorthodox. Good prose often is unorthodox.

Are you confused by the meaning of the sentence?

Below is a very ugly version of the meaning of this sentence. Words in brackets indicate exactly that which the commas suggest without saying a word. I would rather read the sentence in the prompt (with the correct option B inserted).

MEANING:
The brain is [a type of] a stimulus reduction system.
[In other words, the brain is] a means to reduce the nearly infinite number of stimuli that reach the senses at any given moment.
[The brain functions as a means to reduce the number of stimuli] in order to comprehend [a then-manageable number of] the stimuli.
Quote:
Can someone explain modifiers in the sentence and what is it modifying?
If I were to explain all the modifiers in this sentence, I would be writing for days.

The question doesn't test modifiers. It tests

-- countability: Stimuli can be counted. We can have an infinite NUMBER of stimuli.
Eliminate A, D, E

(C) the means of reducing for comprehending
--idiom: THE as a definite article in (C) ruins an otherwise idiomatic construction.

-- verbs: the verbs in this option make no sense. "Reducing" is a TRANSITIVE verb in participle form that needs an object. (Reducing WHAT?) "For comprehending" is not an object.
Eliminate C

Answer B

*Just to clear any concern that you or others may have -- punctuation this intricate would not be tested.
Show more


you are the man!! brilliant explanation!
avatar
TaizKaran
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2019
Last visit: 11 Mar 2024
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
8
Given Kudos: 441
Posts: 18
Kudos: 8
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 05 Jul 2020, 01:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Though I knew that stimuli is countable what made me choose option A is the word "infinte". How can we count infinite things ? There are infinite integers but it doesn't mean that we can count and list all of them. The meaning of the word "infinite" itself means "not countable".

Experts please help. I think this is highly debatable. Magoosh GMATNinja generis Abhi077 GMATNinjatwo ManhattanPrep
User avatar
Bambi2021
User avatar
Joined: 13 Mar 2021
Last visit: 23 Dec 2021
Posts: 319
Own Kudos:
136
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 319
Kudos: 136
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 03 Jul 2021, 10:52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
generis
 countability: Stimuli can be counted. We can have an infinite NUMBER of stimuli.
Eliminate A, D, E
Show more

You make it sound very straightforward. I suspect this is quite debatable.

Stimulus can be both countable and uncountable. In a case like this one, I would prefer to treat stimulus as uncountable. The number of stimuli referred to here, that the brain meets, is so vast that it becomes an uncountable amount.

I vote for A. At least I would have written that way.

https://www.wordreference.com/definition/stimulus

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Bambi2021
User avatar
Joined: 13 Mar 2021
Last visit: 23 Dec 2021
Posts: 319
Own Kudos:
136
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 319
Kudos: 136
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 03 Jul 2021, 11:10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TaizKaran
Though I knew that stimuli is countable what made me choose option A is the word "infinte". How can we count infinite things ? There are infinite integers but it doesn't mean that we can count and list all of them. The meaning of the word "infinite" itself means "not countable".

Experts please help. I think this is highly debatable. Magoosh GMATNinja generis Abhi077 GMATNinjatwo ManhattanPrep
Show more
You may, for example, have an infinite number of prime numbers. But I agree with you that this is far from decided. You can also have an infinite amount of prime numbers, because when something is no longer countable, there is no practical meaning left in the countability of a noun. And language is not a strictly grammatical system, but also highly semantical.

However, If we get some proof that GMAC are very strict with countability rules, there is a point for us to stick to that rule in the context of this test. I doubt though that GMAC would use a debatable example like this one as a decisive point on a real question.

Bottom line: Im not an expert.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,835
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,835
Kudos: 986
The brain is something of a stimulus reduction system, a means to redu 06 Sep 2023, 10:40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts