shubh_2602
Hello, Kindly help on this..
1) While negating option E) - employees will get significant pay raise, but how does it show that they will be able to get a house within 30 min commutation ? We don't know whether they are travelling by personal/public transport and it looks Out of scope a bit.
2) While negating option D) - most employees will have more than 30 min commutation, it also shatters the Conclusion that "Now, most employees will have a 30+ min of commutation."
What am i missing ?
E can be chosen simply by doing POE. In the passage the conclusion is about the OC and not MT. So, once the compnay moves there the current time taken for commuting to office in MT is irrelevant. We need to taken of two things - affordability and commuting within 30 minutes. Both are related. If not so the case then most Acme employees will have a commute of more than 30 minutes. See below.
The chairperson of Acme Corporation has decided to move the company from its current location in Milltown to Ocean View. Most Acme employees cannot
afford housing within a
30-minute commute of Ocean View. So once the company has moved, most Acme employees will have a commute of more than 30 minutes.
(D) Currently, most Acme employees have a commute of less than 30 minutes. - WRONG. Currently what is the status we are not sure.
(E) Acme's move to Ocean View will not be accompanied by a significant pay raise for Acme employees. - CORRECT. May not be the best but POE helps. However, if there had been a pay rise then most could afford Ocean view. But again it requires further assumption as in whether the commute would be less than 30 minutes.
So, while you do good in E, in D you make a mistake on basics. It has to in line to the conclusion which is what you miss to do in D.
HTHs.