GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Aug 2019, 07:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The chairperson should not have released the Election Commission's re

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 317
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
Reviews Badge
The chairperson should not have released the Election Commission's re  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 31 Aug 2018, 02:18
8
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

37% (02:04) correct 63% (01:58) wrong based on 238 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The chairperson should not have released the Election Commission's report to the public, for the chairperson did not consult any other members of the commission about releasing the report before having it released.

The argument's conclusion can be properly inferred if which one of the following is assumed?


(A) It would have been permissible for the chairperson to release the commission's report to the public only if most other members of the commission had first given their consent.

(B) All of the members of the commission had signed the report prior to its release.

(C) The chairperson would not have been justified in releasing the commission's report if any members of the commission had serious reservations about the report's content.

(D) The chairperson would have been justified in releasing the report only if each of the commission's members would have agreed to its being released had they been consulted.

(E) Some members of the commission would have preferred that the report not be released to the public

LSAT-73

12

Originally posted by AshutoshB on 29 Aug 2018, 19:46.
Last edited by workout on 31 Aug 2018, 02:18, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the question.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Jan 2016
Posts: 1
Location: India
Schools: ISB '20
GMAT 1: 550 Q44 V21
GPA: 3.89
Re: The chairperson should not have released the Election Commission's re  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2018, 23:07
AshutoshB Could you please explain .. I thought C is correct
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 511
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The chairperson should not have released the Election Commission's re  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2018, 23:52
1
kapil1509 wrote:
AshutoshB Could you please explain .. I thought C is correct

Since the premise talks exclusively about not consulting any member, their agreement or disagreement is not really in scope here. Option C, D and E can thus be rejected. B is irrelevant and that leaves us with A.
A rightly talks about the members giving just their consent, i.e. the chairperson consulting the members.
--A--
_________________
------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Posts: 34
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V24
GPA: 3.5
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The chairperson should not have released the Election Commission's re  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2018, 08:19
how the assumption answer choice "A" taking us to the conclusion? how to use negation test on this question?
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 30 Apr 2018
Posts: 34
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Re: The chairperson should not have released the Election Commission's re  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2018, 01:13
Hi AshutoshB,
Could you please post the OE?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 317
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
Reviews Badge
Re: The chairperson should not have released the Election Commission's re  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2018, 01:29
aroraishita02 wrote:
Hi AshutoshB,
Could you please post the OE?





CONCLUSION: The chairperson shouldn’t have released the report.

REASONING: The chairperson didn’t ask any other committee members whether the report should be released.

ANALYSIS: On sufficient assumption questions, you should look for a gap between reasoning and conclusion.

Here, we know only one fact: the members weren’t asked. We need to connect this to the conclusion. To prove that release was wrong, we should say “if members weren’t asked, then release was wrong”. The right answer is worded a bit differently (it’s harder to understand!) but it has the same effect.

Normally, you can diagram sufficient assumption questions. That’s because there are multiple conditional statements to link together. But this question doesn’t even have a conditional statement to diagram. There are just two separate facts. Diagramming is a useful tool, but don’t try to apply it blindly where it has no use.

___________

A. CORRECT. The contrapositive of this is: “consent ➞ permissible”
Since the chairperson didn’t ask the members, we don’t know whether they consented, Therefore, the release was not permissible.

B. This weakens the argument. It doesn’t prove that the release was ok, but this fact at least shows the members approved of the report.

C. We don’t know whether any commission members had objections. This doesn’t help.
Objection ➞ permissible

D. This doesn’t work. It’s possible that members would have agreed to a release if they had been consulted.
We need something that shows the release was wrong because the members weren’t consulted.

E. This doesn’t necessarily show the release was wrong. The stimulus never said that a release must obey the preferences of all members.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Posts: 85
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: The chairperson should not have released the Election Commission's re  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2019, 20:33
Hi Expert,

In A , is it necessary to have " most of other member gave their consent " to be true , in order to make the conclusion to be true??

I mean if we negate this sentence, we get "it would have been permissible too even though not most other member gave their consents". That would weaken or not the conclusion???

Please explain.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 19 Apr 2018
Posts: 9
CAT Tests
Re: The chairperson should not have released the Election Commission's re  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2019, 20:56
Where is the OA from. None of these Answers fill in the GAP. The only answer that fits is E and thats bc it makes a generalization. Its obvious that someone didnt want the report released, thats why there is a negative connotation to the conclusion. There is absolutely no way A can be derived. All the argument is talking about is consulting with the other members not ask for permission. Poor quality question
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The chairperson should not have released the Election Commission's re   [#permalink] 02 Aug 2019, 20:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The chairperson should not have released the Election Commission's re

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne