Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 04:22 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 04:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
655-705 Level|   Weaken|         
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,195
 [18]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yashikaaggarwal
User avatar
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 3,086
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,510
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
exc4libur
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Last visit: 22 Mar 2022
Posts: 1,684
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 607
Location: United States
Posts: 1,684
Kudos: 1,447
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
randomavoidplease
Joined: 02 Mar 2020
Last visit: 13 Feb 2021
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
24
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 79
Kudos: 24
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I will go with "E" rest don't seem to make much sense, unless I misunderstood "A"

E is the only that talks about the living conditions disparity, rest we know that population and area size is same. Two cities with same population and size can have different living conditions.
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 360
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Isn't (E) strengthener? Saying that both cities are similar?
User avatar
svasan05
User avatar
CrackVerbal Representative
Joined: 02 Mar 2019
Last visit: 24 Feb 2023
Posts: 269
Own Kudos:
302
 [3]
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 269
Kudos: 302
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lakshya14
Isn't (E) strengthener? Saying that both cities are similar?

Hi Lakshya

Option (E) in fact provides a possible point of difference between the two cities. It states that the argument "fails to take into account that having identical overall population density is consistent with great disparity in living conditions".

In other words, it states that despite the fact that Oldtown and Spoonville have the same population densities ("same in area and size of population"), they may have great disparity in living conditions. Since the health problems mentioned are dependent on crowded living conditions, such disparity may mean that the problems widespread in Oldtown may not be widespread in Spoonville, as concluded in the argument.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,203
Own Kudos:
272
 [1]
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,203
Kudos: 272
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The cities of Oldtown and Spoonville are the same in area and size of population. Since certain health problems that are caused by crowded living conditions are widespread in Oldtown, such problems must be as widespread in Spoonville.

The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument


(A) presupposes without warrant that the health problems that are widespread in any particular city cannot be caused by the living conditions in that city X
This is simply not true at all. The author says the opposite...

(B) fails to distinguish between the size of the total population of a city and the size of the geographic region covered by that city X
-no...the author did not fail to distinguish this

(C) fails to indicate whether average life expectancy is lowered as a result of living in crowded conditions X
-no...the author did not do this...LE is also irrelevant

(D) fails to distinguish between those health problems that are easily treatable and those are not X
-again, no.

(E) fails to take into account that having identical overall population density is consistent with great disparity in living conditions
CORRECT. The key here is "consistent with great disparity in living conditions", i.e. two populations can have the same population density yet vastly different living conditions. So while Oldtown may have crappy conditions, that doesn't imply that Spoonville does too.
User avatar
Bish0p
Joined: 14 Oct 2022
Last visit: 27 Aug 2025
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 132
Posts: 10
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Cx – S have health condition
Px - O have health condition due to crowded l.c; same size and population
Ax – S=O and no other factor can contribute this
A’’ – They are not same; other factor also there; S might not be correct representative


(A) presupposes without warrant that the health problems that are widespread in any particular city cannot be caused by the living conditions in that city – Questioning the premises, hence out of scope

(B) fails to distinguish between the size of the total population of a city and the size of the geographic region covered by that city - Questioning the premises, hence out of scope

(C) fails to indicate whether average life expectancy is lowered as a result of living in crowded conditions – Out of scope, as in question nothing is mentioned regarding life expectancy

(D) fails to distinguish between those health problems that are easily treatable and those are not – Out of scope, as nothing mentioned in argument

(E) fails to take into account that having identical overall population density is consistent with great disparity in living conditions - weaken the argument
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 18 Jul 2025
Posts: 5,934
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,934
Kudos: 5,327
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The cities of Oldtown and Spoonville are the same in area and size of population. Since certain health problems that are caused by crowded living conditions are widespread in Oldtown, such problems must be as widespread in Spoonville.

The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument


(A) presupposes without warrant that the health problems that are widespread in any particular city cannot be caused by the living conditions in that city

(B) fails to distinguish between the size of the total population of a city and the size of the geographic region covered by that city

(C) fails to indicate whether average life expectancy is lowered as a result of living in crowded conditions

(D) fails to distinguish between those health problems that are easily treatable and those are not

(E) fails to take into account that having identical overall population density is consistent with great disparity in living conditions

Oldtown and Spoonville are same in terms of Area and Population.
A health problem of crowded Population is there in Oldtown -----> Same problem must exist in Spoonville (Conclusion)


(A) Will keep it for now.
(B) geographic region covered - Out of scope and irrelevant.
(C) average life expectancy - Out of scope
(D) distinguish between health problems that are treatable and not - Out of scope and irrelevant
(E) Will keep for now.

Between (E) and (A)

If (A) living condition is not the issue then what can be then issue, (E) on the other hand bridges that gap...
User avatar
nikitathegreat
Joined: 16 Dec 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 201
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 110
Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V31
Products:
GMAT 1: 630 Q45 V31
Posts: 201
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja KarishmaB

I have confusion between option choice B and E. Sharing my analysis below. Please let me know where did I go wrong.

Option choice B
(B) fails to distinguish between the size of the total population of a city and the size of the geographic region covered by that city -The argument tells us that the size of the population and the area of the two cities are same. But what if one city has crowded conditions like out of 100sq feet 50 people live in 50sq feet whereas in other city out of 100 sq feet, 50 people live in 90 sq feet - not having crowded conditions. I felt this option choice talks about the same thing that the argument fails to distinguish between the size of the population of the city and the geographic region covered by this population.

Option Choice E
(E) fails to take into account that having identical overall population density is consistent with great disparity in living conditions
Population density = no. of people/ land area = Are we saying that population density is consistent with great disparity in living conditions - what does living conditions means here? Do they still live crowded but there living conditions are better (I am not really convinced with this inference) or do they not live crowded and satisfies the above logic where they live in a spaced out manner.
Can you explain the difference in this and above ans choice?

Thanks
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts