It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 20:19

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The city council will certainly vote to approve the new

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 2 [1], given: 0

The city council will certainly vote to approve the new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2009, 06:27
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

63% (01:12) correct 37% (01:42) wrong based on 85 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment
plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign
contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate
development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument
above?
(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions
from environmental lobbying groups.
(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each
(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in,
and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.
(D) The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to
the interests of their campaign contributors.
(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment
plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.

Kudos [?]: 2 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 60

Kudos [?]: 9 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2009, 06:41
1
KUDOS
I choose D. If it turns out that the campaign contributions do not affect the decision of the city councils, then it weakens the argument.

Kudos [?]: 9 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2007
Posts: 72

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2009, 06:47
IMO D

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 214

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2009, 09:33
D

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 6

Director
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 872

Kudos [?]: 860 [0], given: 18

Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2009, 11:13
I donno but today seems to be a bad day for me wrt to CRs
I would go with A, against public opinion...wat is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 860 [0], given: 18

Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Posts: 483

Kudos [?]: 366 [1], given: 15

Schools: Fuqua

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2009, 11:36
1
KUDOS
I will go with D.

The stimulus is saying very specifically(WILL CERTAINLY) that the city council vote to approve the new develpoment plan because the campaing money they reiceved is from the Real estate dev firms.

The best way to pick an ans choice is to see which of the ans choices shows a possibility where the conclusion fails to account for or times where the conclusion is no more good.

From the ans choices, D looks best. It states that the menbers of the city concil frequently voted against the interests of the campaign contributors. With this ans, there is no way the conclusion can be very specific to say that the count will vote for the new downtown development.

Kudos [?]: 366 [1], given: 15

Director
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 872

Kudos [?]: 860 [0], given: 18

Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2009, 12:42
OA pls

Kudos [?]: 860 [0], given: 18

Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2009
Posts: 221

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2009, 12:53
I would agree with D as well.

If city council members have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors, then city council might not vote to approve new downtown redevelopment plan.

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 13

Intern
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 2 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2009, 01:51
1
KUDOS
OA is : D

Kudos [?]: 2 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 112

Kudos [?]: 29 [1], given: 3

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2009, 02:28
1
KUDOS
I found A a good candidate, because it seems to say that environmentalists are paying and/or supporting the projects. If they were doing so, they could actually want the projects, right?
But that does not weaken the argument. The point is not about where the money/support comes from.

What is critical here is: is the city council likely to vote????? (the argument is so sure that the answer is YES)

Thus, D casts doubt whether it will vote to approve the project, because its previous behavior in other projects.

Kudos [?]: 29 [1], given: 3

Re: city council   [#permalink] 30 Sep 2009, 02:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The city council will certainly vote to approve the new

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.