Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 22 May 2017, 15:37

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The city government should invest surplus funds in improving

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2012
Posts: 102
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, Real Estate
GMAT Date: 10-22-2012
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 75 [1] , given: 47

GMAT ToolKit User
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2012, 00:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

78% (02:39) correct 22% (01:09) wrong based on 146 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network. Most of the
network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population.
The
subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.
If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries
relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized.
In
the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
• The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.
• The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author’s conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
• The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.
• The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes
that situation.
• The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

Last edited by aditi1903 on 14 Oct 2012, 08:06, edited 1 time in total.
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Jul 2011
Posts: 113
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [2] , given: 10

Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2012, 08:24
2
This post received
KUDOS
IMO A, though E also seems to be a good option.

I think the problem with E is that it uses the word "consequence" for the second bold part while option A uses the word "prediction". I think the second bold part is more of a prediction as consequence is something which is certain (given the stated conditions are met) while prediction is something which is likely but not certain

Please let me know in case I am missing something.
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 886
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 74

Kudos [?]: 656 [0], given: 44

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2012, 08:30
I guess choice B is the correct one. The 1st bold is is, in fact, the plan of action the city are doing. And if without the first, there will be have consequence as the 2nd bold sentence said. All of these are said in choice B.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 509
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 269

Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2012, 02:38
+1 E

BF1 – It gives justification for the problem

Problem – The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.

BF2 – It gives consequences of the problem

:-D
_________________

First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: exam is close ... dont know if i ll hit that number
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 197
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 10-09-2012
GPA: 3.2
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 1

Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2012, 08:45
i would go with A
because E states the second bold face as the consequence which is incorrect..
its just prediction the author is making about future consequences...
_________________

just one more month for exam...

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 May 2012
Posts: 56
GMAT Date: 09-10-2012
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 14

Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Oct 2012, 05:41
aditi1903 wrote:
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network. Most of the
network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population.
The
subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.
If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries
relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized.
In
the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
• The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.
• The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author’s conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
• The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.
• The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes
that situation.
• The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.



Stmt 1: The city govt should invest in transportation network-------Why------------Reason or justification is------------Most of the
network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population

Stmt 2: If the problem is not solved-----------consequences are----Many of its prized industries
relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized.

+1 E

hth
3 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 294
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 265 [3] , given: 32

Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Oct 2012, 21:59
3
This post received
KUDOS
aditi1903 wrote:
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network. Most of the
network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population.
The
subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.
If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries
relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized.
In
the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
• The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.
• The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author’s conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
• The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.
• The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes
that situation.
• The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.


I'll go with A.

WHY NOT E?
1st part is not impending problem (impending problem means a problem yet to occur and soon to occur, but the problem is already there (Most of the
network was put in place at a time), expressed correctly in Answer A
2nd is not consequences of that problem, it is a caution that is If u don't do X then Y will happen ( expressed correctly in Answer A)

WHY NOT B?
2nd bold face is not the conclusion. the conclusion is "The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network."

I guess other answer choices can be eliminated too for the aforementioned reasons.

Wordup!

HTH
Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 509
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 269

Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2012, 00:24
Jp27 wrote:
aditi1903 wrote:
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network. Most of the
network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population.
The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient. If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A) The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.

E) The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.


I'll go with A.

WHY NOT E?
1st part is not impending problem (impending problem means a problem yet to occur and soon to occur, but the problem is already there (Most of the network was put in place at a time), expressed correctly in Answer A
2nd is not consequences of that problem, it is a caution that is If u don't do X then Y will happen ( expressed correctly in Answer A)


Good Point Jp27

Problem/Current State of Affairs is - The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.
BF2 - If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized. (Consequence and prediction are both right. Although Prediction is better, I have no reason to believe that consequence is wrong. Any thoughts?)

Bone of contention should therefore be BF1

BF1 - Most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population (This is not the problem, but a reason as to why the aforementioned problem/current state of affair exists. Your reasoning to prove BF1 wrong in E is flawed as you have considered BF1 to be the problem whereas in option it takes BF1 to be the justification/reason for the problem. But yes, you are right in pointing out the “impending” situation (+1 to you))

Why I think A is wrong is because BF1 is not an explanation OF the problem but explanation FOR the problem. Anyways nice point Jp. Keep it up.

Aditi OA and explanation please.
:-D
_________________

First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 161
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 29

Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2012, 11:53
Ans is A.

First statement is a fact/evidence.
Second statement is a prediction.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2012
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 17

Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Oct 2012, 04:05
I agree with JP, though I still think second BF is the easiest and quickest way to solve this.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 400
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 212 [0], given: 82

Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Oct 2012, 07:13
i also chose E..

Jp27 wrote:
aditi1903 wrote:
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network. Most of the
network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population.
The
subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.
If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries
relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized.
In
the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
• The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.
• The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author’s conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
• The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.
• The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes
that situation.
• The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.


I'll go with A.

WHY NOT E?
1st part is not impending problem (impending problem means a problem yet to occur and soon to occur, but the problem is already there (Most of the
network was put in place at a time), expressed correctly in Answer A
2nd is not consequences of that problem, it is a caution that is If u don't do X then Y will happen ( expressed correctly in Answer A)

WHY NOT B?
2nd bold face is not the conclusion. the conclusion is "The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network."

I guess other answer choices can be eliminated too for the aforementioned reasons.

Wordup!

HTH


after above quoted post.. i l go with A..impending mean..problem will occur..so agree with A..
_________________

Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10365
Followers: 996

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2014, 13:43
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Sep 2015
Posts: 76
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 29

Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Mar 2017, 21:38
(A) This choice states that the first statement is an explanation of a current state of affairs. This explanation is consistent with the passage. The answer choice goes on to describe the second bolded statement as a prediction based on that state of affairs. This is also consistent with the passage: the second bolded statement predicts what will happen as a result of the inadequacy of the current transportation network.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 460
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 823

Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Apr 2017, 23:23
The conclusion of the argument is that the city will see many of its prized
industries relocate to more convenient cities and the city's financial health will be
jeopardized if the city does not make changes soon to the transportation network.
This is also the second bolded sentence. The first bolded sentence states that
most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in
both area and population. We need to find a choice that correctly describes both
of these bolded statements.
Overview of problem :-
1) gov't should invest funds in transport network
2) network is really old, when city was smaller
3) subway outdated
4) buses bad
5) if no changes are made, then companies will move away, and the city will go downhill

I think you could argue that statements 1 and 5 are both conclusions: one's about what we "should" do and the other is about what will happen if we don't do what we "should" do. You'll notice that the answer doesn't change either way.

Most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population
This doesn't oppose or support the author's conclusion
This doesn't tell you that it is a problem
This just describe the curent situation

The use of the words if and will in the second boldface suggest a prediction.

Based on this analysis, the answer = A


(A) CORRECT. This choice states that the first statement is an explanation of a
current state of affairs. This explanation is consistent with the passage. The
answer choice goes on to describe the second bolded statement as a prediction
based on that state of affairs. This is also consistent with the passage: the
second bolded statement predicts what will happen as a result of the inadequacy
of the current transportation network.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Status: active
Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Posts: 165
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 4
WE: Web Development (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 9

Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2017, 04:12
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network. Most of the
network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population. The
subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.
If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries
relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized. In
the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
• The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.
• The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author’s conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
• The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.
• The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes
that situation.
• The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.

B C and D are instant elimination

In E we have consequence ,which means it will sure shot occurs
In A we have prediction which is correct
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving   [#permalink] 19 Apr 2017, 04:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic Boldface Revision: The city government should invest surplus funds souvik101990 7 08 Dec 2015, 15:16
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic The stated goal of the government's funding program for the arts is to Gmat1008 4 15 Dec 2016, 01:38
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic Advisor: The government of city of Benzaria should discontinue the req egmat 4 21 May 2014, 11:58
Government funding for the arts must be increased if we vivtai 6 26 Nov 2012, 05:01
11 The city government should invest surplus funds in improving nsp007 22 29 Aug 2015, 04:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The city government should invest surplus funds in improving

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.