Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
24 Dec 2020, 10:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
Here is the full breakdown for Question #1 in this set:
The key behind a "Mimic" question like this is to carefully determine the "Big Picture" associated with the question and then "Nitpick" answers, eliminating answers that don't fit. The question asks for what situation the author "would most likely support government intervention and regulation."
In the last paragraph the author talks about the "more reasonable view" (an indication that the author agrees with this perspective.) This view argues that regulation is needed in cases when big corporations fail to pass on to the public the savings associated with economies of scale. So, our job is to find the answer that demonstrates this situation.
Answer choice (A) does exactly that. Patent protection creates a type of legalized monopoly, where only a specific company has the right to sell a particular product. The word "because" in this answer choice is crucial. It indicates a cause-effect relationship: the reason why the drug is so expensive is because of the patent protection. Thus, other hypothetical reasons for expensive drugs (such as production costs, R&D, etc.) are not relevant here. Since the drug cannot be afforded by the general public "because" of the patent protection, the public is not seeing the benefits of the economies of scale. It would be in the public interest to regulate this specific, monopolistic situation. Answer choice (A) is a perfect fit.
Answer choice (B) is a classic trap answer. It specifically states that a company has a "monopoly" for its most important product. However, the author argues that regulation is needed when the cost savings associated with monopolies are not passed on to the general public. Since (B) states that "prices have gone down," this is not the type of monopoly that needs to be regulated. Eliminate (B).
Likewise, (C) states that collusion between companies has kept prices low for a specific product. This is in the public interest, so (C) can be equally eliminated.
While some people may pick (D) because it specifically mentions one of the benefits associated with economies of scale (namely "cheaper production") while never saying that these cost savings are passed on to the public. However, not mentioning something doesn't mean it doesn't happen. (I call this trap "Lack of Evidence is Not Evidence" in my classes.) In order for answer choice (D) to describe a situation where regulation is needed, the reader must assume that the savings associated with cheaper production are retained by the companies and not passed on to the public. But we don't know this. There is no information on whether those savings are passed on or retained. With Critical Reasoning questions, correct answers should be sufficient without needing extra, unstated assumptions.
Answer choice (E) is very similar to (B). While it describes a virtual monopoly, it also mentions that the petroleum firm has used its market dominance to "greatly reduce domestic gas prices." Since the general public benefits from this type of monopoly, the author would not argue that such a type of monopoly needs to be regulated.
To summarize: three of the five answer choices (B, C, and E) indicate that prices have gone down due to the business practices mentioned. Because this benefits the public, these answers can be easily eliminated. (D) requires an extra assumption not explicitly stated in the problem in order to work. This leaves only answer choice (A) -- a situation where there is clear monopolistic price gouging.
Answer choice (A) is the correct answer.
The key behind a "Mimic" question like this is to carefully determine the "Big Picture" associated with the question and then "Nitpick" answers, eliminating answers that don't fit. The question asks for what situation the author "would most likely support government intervention and regulation."
In the last paragraph the author talks about the "more reasonable view" (an indication that the author agrees with this perspective.) This view argues that regulation is needed in cases when big corporations fail to pass on to the public the savings associated with economies of scale. So, our job is to find the answer that demonstrates this situation.
Answer choice (A) does exactly that. Patent protection creates a type of legalized monopoly, where only a specific company has the right to sell a particular product. The word "because" in this answer choice is crucial. It indicates a cause-effect relationship: the reason why the drug is so expensive is because of the patent protection. Thus, other hypothetical reasons for expensive drugs (such as production costs, R&D, etc.) are not relevant here. Since the drug cannot be afforded by the general public "because" of the patent protection, the public is not seeing the benefits of the economies of scale. It would be in the public interest to regulate this specific, monopolistic situation. Answer choice (A) is a perfect fit.
Answer choice (B) is a classic trap answer. It specifically states that a company has a "monopoly" for its most important product. However, the author argues that regulation is needed when the cost savings associated with monopolies are not passed on to the general public. Since (B) states that "prices have gone down," this is not the type of monopoly that needs to be regulated. Eliminate (B).
Likewise, (C) states that collusion between companies has kept prices low for a specific product. This is in the public interest, so (C) can be equally eliminated.
While some people may pick (D) because it specifically mentions one of the benefits associated with economies of scale (namely "cheaper production") while never saying that these cost savings are passed on to the public. However, not mentioning something doesn't mean it doesn't happen. (I call this trap "Lack of Evidence is Not Evidence" in my classes.) In order for answer choice (D) to describe a situation where regulation is needed, the reader must assume that the savings associated with cheaper production are retained by the companies and not passed on to the public. But we don't know this. There is no information on whether those savings are passed on or retained. With Critical Reasoning questions, correct answers should be sufficient without needing extra, unstated assumptions.
Answer choice (E) is very similar to (B). While it describes a virtual monopoly, it also mentions that the petroleum firm has used its market dominance to "greatly reduce domestic gas prices." Since the general public benefits from this type of monopoly, the author would not argue that such a type of monopoly needs to be regulated.
To summarize: three of the five answer choices (B, C, and E) indicate that prices have gone down due to the business practices mentioned. Because this benefits the public, these answers can be easily eliminated. (D) requires an extra assumption not explicitly stated in the problem in order to work. This leaves only answer choice (A) -- a situation where there is clear monopolistic price gouging.
Answer choice (A) is the correct answer.
22 Jan 2021, 18:56
Kudos
Bookmarks
3. In regard to the situation in the late 19th and early 20th century, the author would most likely agree with which of the following statements:
A) Large monopolies and the consolidation of business are not in the public interest.
B) Government regulation is usually beneficial to the public interest.
C) Trusts could be beneficial to the public interest.
D) Having a free and open society is essential to the public interest.
E) Trusts should be abolished to benefit the public interest.
Can someone please explain why option B is incorrect.
"but rather regulated and controlled by the government in order to guarantee that the public interest was upheld."
My understanding was that its mentioned clearly in the last passage that government regulation will benefit people.
How do we choose between (Trust is beneficial vs Government regulation is beneficial)
A) Large monopolies and the consolidation of business are not in the public interest.
B) Government regulation is usually beneficial to the public interest.
C) Trusts could be beneficial to the public interest.
D) Having a free and open society is essential to the public interest.
E) Trusts should be abolished to benefit the public interest.
Can someone please explain why option B is incorrect.
"but rather regulated and controlled by the government in order to guarantee that the public interest was upheld."
My understanding was that its mentioned clearly in the last passage that government regulation will benefit people.
How do we choose between (Trust is beneficial vs Government regulation is beneficial)
22 Jan 2021, 19:02
Kudos
Bookmarks
Which of the following can be properly inferred about the late 19th and early 20th century from the passage above?
A) In U.S. society, people were able to freely move up depending on their abilities.
B) Competition and equality of opportunity were considered important elements of a simple economy and society.
C) Anti-trust issues were debated often in the U.S. Congress.
D) A majority of Americans believed that trusts should be destroyed.
E) Trusts were inherently bad for the U.S. economy.
Can someone explain why C is incorrect? Also please elaborate on why B is correct.
A) In U.S. society, people were able to freely move up depending on their abilities.
B) Competition and equality of opportunity were considered important elements of a simple economy and society.
C) Anti-trust issues were debated often in the U.S. Congress.
D) A majority of Americans believed that trusts should be destroyed.
E) Trusts were inherently bad for the U.S. economy.
Can someone explain why C is incorrect? Also please elaborate on why B is correct.
