GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 12 Dec 2019, 12:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The conventional process for tanning leather uses large

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2012
Posts: 11
GPA: 3.87
The conventional process for tanning leather uses large  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2013, 13:15
1
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

70% (02:12) correct 30% (02:16) wrong based on 359 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The conventional process for tanning leather uses large amounts of calcium oxide and sodium sulfide. Tanning leather using biological catalysts costs about the same as using these conventional chemicals if the cost of waste disposal is left out of the comparison. However, nearly 20 percent less waste is produced with biological catalysts, and waste disposal is a substantial part of the overall cost of tanning. It is therefore less costly to tan leather if biological catalysts are used instead.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

(A) Leather tanned using the conventional process is not lower in quality than is leather tanned using biological catalysts.

(B) The biological catalysts that can be used in the tanning process are less costly by weight than are calcium oxide and sodium sulfide.

(C) New technological innovations have recently made the use of biological catalysts in the tanning process much more cost effective.

(D) Disposal of tanning waste produced with biological catalysts does not cost significantly more than disposal of the same amount of waste produced with the conventional process.

(E) The labor costs associated with tanning leather using biological catalysts are not any greater than the labor costs associated with the conventional tanning process.

Source: LSAT
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1098
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: The conventional process for tanning leather uses large  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Nov 2013, 23:12
2
Premise 1 : Conventional and biological catalyst methods cost the same if cost of waste disposal is not considered.
Premise 2 : Biological methods produce 20% less waste.

Conclusion : Biological method is cheaper.

Obvious jump : The cost per unit for disposal of the wastage may be different and can thus make the disposal of waste from the biological method more expensive.

(A) Leather tanned using the conventional process is not lower in quality than is leather tanned using biological catalysts. Irrelevant. We are only concerned about the cost and not the quality of the leather.

(B) The biological catalysts that can be used in the tanning process are less costly by weight than are calcium oxide and sodium sulfide. Irrelevant. Regardless of the cost of the catalysts, the fact that the methods cost the same is given in the premise itself.

(C) New technological innovations have recently made the use of biological catalysts in the tanning process much more cost effective. Irrelevant. Again, the method still costs the same as conventional methods. It may only be more cost effective than it was previously but still costs the same as conventional methods.

(D) Disposal of tanning waste produced with biological catalysts does not cost significantly more than disposal of the same amount of waste produced with the conventional process. Hits the nail on the head. This assumption assures us that the cost of disposing waste produced from the biological method is not much more expensive than the cost of removing the waste from conventional method. This is the answer.

(E) The labor costs associated with tanning leather using biological catalysts are not any greater than the labor costs associated with the conventional tanning process.[/quote] Irrelevant. Regardless of the cost of the labor, the fact that the methods cost the same is given in the premise itself.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2012
Posts: 11
GPA: 3.87
Re: The conventional process for tanning leather uses large  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2013, 00:35
Thanks, it's clear.
I guess, this one is from LSAT, but i'm not sure.
VP
VP
avatar
V
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 1174
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The conventional process for tanning leather uses large  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 26 Sep 2017, 23:47
The conventional process for tanning leather uses large amounts of calcium oxide and sodium sulfide. Tanning leather using biological catalysts costs about the same as using these conventional chemicals if the cost of waste disposal is left out of the comparison. However, nearly 20 percent less waste is produced with biological catalysts, and waste disposal is a substantial part of the overall cost of tanning. It is therefore less costly to tan leather if biological catalysts are used instead.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

(A) Leather tanned using the conventional process is not lower in quality than is leather tanned using biological catalysts.
(B) The biological catalysts that can be used in the tanning process are less costly by weight than are calcium oxide and sodium sulfide.
(C) New technological innovations have recently made the use of biological catalysts in the tanning process much more cost effective.
(D) Disposal of tanning waste produced with biological catalysts does not cost significantly more than disposal of the same amount of waste produced with the conventional process.
(E) The labor costs associated with tanning leather using biological catalysts are not any greater than the labor costs associated with the conventional tanning process.

Source: LSAT
_________________
Non progredi est regredi

Originally posted by Akela on 26 Sep 2017, 22:12.
Last edited by broall on 26 Sep 2017, 23:47, edited 1 time in total.
Merged post. Please search before posting
CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 869
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Reviews Badge
Re: The conventional process for tanning leather uses large  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Apr 2019, 10:35
Bumping for discussion. An easier LSAT question
_________________
D-Day: November 18th, 2017

My CR Guide: Here
My RC Guide: Here
Need an expert to grade your AWA? Go: Here
Want to know your Business School chances? Go: Here
Want to be a moderator? We may want you to be one! See how: Here
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The conventional process for tanning leather uses large   [#permalink] 06 Apr 2019, 10:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The conventional process for tanning leather uses large

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne