Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Originally posted by vjsharma25 on 15 Mar 2011, 22:17.
Last edited by vjsharma25 on 15 Mar 2011, 23:02, edited 1 time in total.
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Show timer
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
a62%
b14%
c2%
d19%
e2%
A
B
C
D
E
Hide
Show
History
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
62%
(02:02)
correct 38%
(01:37)
wrong
based on 42
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The cost of a semester’s tuition at a certain university is based on the number of courses in which a student enrolls that semester. Although the cost per course at that university has not risen in four years, many of its students who could afford the tuition when they first enrolled now claim they can no longer afford it.
Each of the following, if true, helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy above EXCEPT:
(A) Faculty salaries at the university have risen slightly over the past four years. (B) The number of courses per semester for which full-time students are required to enroll is higher this year than any time in the past. (C) The cost of living in the vicinity of the university has risen over the last two years. (D) The university awards new students a large number of scholarships that are renewed each year for the students who maintain high grade averages. (E) The university has turned many of its part-time office jobs, for which students had generally been hired, into full-time, nonstudent positions.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
(B) The number of courses per semester for which full-time students are required to enroll is higher this year than any time in the past.: Direct correlation- More number of courses would mean that even with same fees per course, total money required to be spent on tuition will go up- hence the inaffordability (C) The cost of living in the vicinity of the university has risen over the last two years.: If students are spending more on living costs, they might be getting left with less money to spend on tuition- hence the inaffodability. (D) The university awards new students a large number of scholarships that are renewed each year for the students who maintain high grade averages.: University awards new students this scholarships- not sure if the students who could afford tuition earlier and cant afford it now are new or not (E) The university has turned many of its part-time office jobs, for which students had generally been hired, into full-time, nonstudent positions.: Implies that the student who might be earning extra money helping them afford tuition no longer have those jobs or the extra money- hence the inaffordability.
Faculty salaries at the university have risen slightly over the past four years.: So what? No where any hint is given, or an assumption can be made as to faculty salaries are to be paid by students. in fact, tuition mostly is supposed to cover faculty salaries. Since this cant be an expenditure attributed to the students, this cant resolve the discrepancy of inaffordability.
(D) The university awards new students a large number of scholarships that are renewed each year for the students who maintain high grade averages.: University awards new students this scholarships- not sure if the students who could afford tuition earlier and cant afford it now are new or not
Show more
Hmmm....I think I understand this option how it is resolving the discrepancy/paradox.
When students enrolls,most of them are given scholarship,which offsets the tuition cost. But students have to maintain the high grades to renew the scholarship,but they are not able to do it now.Thats why initially they were able to pay the tuition feess but not now. Convinced?
I wanted to ask you about this but while writing I got this reasoning
vjsharma25 - I think you are making a big assumption that the students are not able to maintain high grades. Here's my thinking -
1. When NEW students enrol, scholarship provided...say Year 1 scholarship provided 2. Year 2, the same students who have completed their first year are no longer new and are not provided scholarships. They now think that the course is expensive.
Try as I might, I'm not able to buy vivesomnium's argument. "Faculty salaries at the university have risen slightly over the past four years.: So what? No where any hint is given, or an assumption can be made as to faculty salaries are to be paid by students. in fact, tuition mostly is supposed to cover faculty salaries. Since this cant be an expenditure attributed to the students, this cant resolve the discrepancy of inaffordability." Well, if faculty salaries have risen and if the tution is supposed to cover faculty salary, it is but obvious that the tution has also increased with the result that students bear the brunt of increasing faculty salaries
I also opted D first but the answer is A.I am not totally convinced with the answer though.
Show more
Here is my 2 cents.
The paradox is: Even though the cost of courses has been constant, many students claim they can no longer afford tuition.
(A) Faculty salaries at the university have risen slightly over the past four years.
Because the passage tells us that the costs of courses have not risen, the fact that faculty salaries have risen cannot be the explanation for why students can no longer afford tuition (or say that they can no longer afford tuition). Thus, choice A is correct.
let's look at choice D:
(D) The university awards new students a large number of scholarships that are renewed each year for the students who maintain high grade averages.
Well, if many students used to get scholarship money but no longer do so (the ones who didn't maintain their grades), that could be a logical explanation for why many students can no longer afford the tuition. (Note that both the stimulus and this answer choice say "many").
okay main funda is look out for any option that states students expenditure in some other direction or anything that just grabs students money that was actually intended for the tuition fee.
while searching we get first one A and thats what we want. we have it lets move on..
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.