GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 20 Feb 2019, 16:28

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Free GMAT Prep Hour

February 20, 2019

February 20, 2019

08:00 PM EST

09:00 PM EST

Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Wednesday, February 20th at 8 PM EST

February 21, 2019

February 21, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Kick off your 2019 GMAT prep with a free 7-day boot camp that includes free online lessons, webinars, and a full GMAT course access. Limited for the first 99 registrants! Feb. 21st until the 27th.

# The cost of flood damage since 1980 has been greater in areas that hav

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 31 Aug 2015
Posts: 16
GMAT 1: 750 Q48 V46
The cost of flood damage since 1980 has been greater in areas that hav  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2015, 16:56
6
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

43% (01:57) correct 57% (01:54) wrong based on 190 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The cost of flood damage since 1980 has been greater in areas that have adopted flood-control measures than in those that have not. Thus, flood-control projects are expensive engineering mistakes and a substantial waste of resources.

Which of the following, if true, would be most damaging to the argument above?

A. Those areas that had not suffered flood damage before 1980 are the only ones that have not adopted flood-control measures.
B. Since 1980, those areas that have taken flood-control measures have suffered greater flood damage than they did in the previous decade.
C. The cost of flood damage has increased every year since 1980.
D. Faulty engineering has not been the only cause of the failure of flood-control projects.
E. The amount of rainfall since 1980 has been substantially greater than normal.
Intern
Joined: 31 Aug 2015
Posts: 16
GMAT 1: 750 Q48 V46
Re: The cost of flood damage since 1980 has been greater in areas that hav  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2015, 17:38
The first sentence is factual whereas the second is purportedly a conclusion based on the first. The correct answer should therefore weaken the link between the fact and the argument.

Spend 2 seconds trying to predict what could possibly weaken the conclusion. My prediction: something that differentiates the areas that adopted flood-control from those that didn't, an unmentioned variable.

(A) indicates that floods are not uniformly distributed: some areas are affected more than others. Affected areas could be more likely to seek protective measures. That the measures are not perfect does not mean they're mistakes. Very solid candidate answer.

(B) is consistent with the stem's conclusion. Although it doesn't strengthen the argument, it sure doesn't weaken it.

The only thing we could conclude from (C) is that flood-control measures have been getting more expensive. Because it points to higher costs, this choice is consistent with the main argument ("expensive...mistakes", "substantial waste of resources").

(D) suggests that there might be another factor, other than faulty engineering, contributing to the failure of flood-control projects. This is in line with what we're looking for in an answer, because it mildly weakens the argument by questioning its scope. But this choice is also, in a way, consistent with the argument... it's a "yes, but not only" statement. "[F]ailure" is also a strong word given that the argument does not specify the objectives of flood-control projects--could be to eliminate, minimize, or reduce damages.

(E) is good but it takes an unwarranted leap of judgment to make it work in context. We're looking for something that differentiates two areas, so a general statement that could apply to both areas does not help.
Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2014
Posts: 187
GMAT Date: 08-04-2015
Re: The cost of flood damage since 1980 has been greater in areas that hav  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2015, 09:21
Hi experts,

I could not understand why A is a better choice than B. I am presenting what I understood so far: Some places use Flood Control measures (X); some do not (Y).
Cost of flood damage is more for X than for Y. So, author concludes: flood-control projects are expensive engineering mistakes and a substantial waste of resources.
We need to weaken this.
So, we basically need to show that some other reason for more cost is in play and not the expensive engineering mistakes and a substantial waste of resources.

A may indicate: that Y are less prone to flood damage than X are. BUT we are interested in flood damage cost - i.e. the cost of damage after one flood. How the less probability of flood is useful?

B says: X have suffered greater flood damages after 1980 than previous decade. Partly suggests a different reason, though do not compare X and Y properly.

What am I missing here? Pls suggest.

Thanks.
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 373
Re: The cost of flood damage since 1980 has been greater in areas that hav  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2015, 22:16
Hi Binit,

B actually in a way strengthens the argument IMO by saying that "the areas have suffered greater flood damage than they did in the previous decade."

Conclusion:flood-control projects are expensive engineering mistakes and a substantial waste of resources.

This is a weaken question so we either need an alternate reason for the observed ineffectiveness of the flood control measures or find out a reason that did not fix the initial problem in the first place(ie. with respect to the argument).

Now as per A, we notice that the problem persisted in say X area and not in Y area and hence X resorted to flood-control projects in 1980.

When floods cant affect Y(say they are high altitude or so) it directly implies that still even till date.."The cost of flood damage since 1980 has been greater in areas that have adopted flood-control measures".

Hope it helps.
Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2014
Posts: 187
GMAT Date: 08-04-2015
Re: The cost of flood damage since 1980 has been greater in areas that hav  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2015, 07:56
Hi dominicraj,

Thanks for your response. I got it. I totally misunderstood the argument. Somehow, I thought the first line of the argument talks about the cost of damage per flood after 1980. That's funny
A obviously is a weakener and B strengthens the argument and gives some incentive to doubt the engineering dept. Thank you so much.
Retired Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 501
Re: The cost of flood damage since 1980 has been greater in areas that hav  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2019, 00:47
800orDie wrote:
The cost of flood damage since 1980 has been greater in areas that have adopted flood-control measures than in those that have not. Thus, flood-control projects are expensive engineering mistakes and a substantial waste of resources.

Which of the following, if true, would be most damaging to the argument above?

A. Those areas that had not suffered flood damage before 1980 are the only ones that have not adopted flood-control measures.
B. Since 1980, those areas that have taken flood-control measures have suffered greater flood damage than they did in the previous decade.
C. The cost of flood damage has increased every year since 1980.
D. Faulty engineering has not been the only cause of the failure of flood-control projects.
E. The amount of rainfall since 1980 has been substantially greater than normal.

The cost of flood damage since 1980 has been greater in areas that have adopted flood-control measures than in those that have not. The the cost of flood damage BEFORE 1980 had ALSO been greater in areas that had adopted flood-control measures than in those that had not, because (A) before 1980, there had no flood damage in non-controlled area. So, the conclusion that flood-control projects are expensive engineering mistakes and a substantial waste of resources can not be justified.
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Posts: 31
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The cost of flood damage since 1980 has been greater in areas that hav  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2019, 03:54
can someone please tell me ,how to proceed on this question. What thing we need to weak or what thing we need to find out in order to proceed... or how to approach this question?
Re: The cost of flood damage since 1980 has been greater in areas that hav   [#permalink] 09 Feb 2019, 03:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by