AndrewN VeritasKarishma AjiteshArun GMATNinjaI have a small but an important doubt. I have often suffered when differentiating between what's the correct usage of the word "would".
So, I identified four scenarios where the usage of "would" is correct. They are:
• To present a habit/action of past.
She would cry, when she remembered her dog. In this case, "would" is "replaceable" by "used to". She
used to cry, when she remembered her dog.
• If and then conditionals.
If she knew that he was a liar, she would have never dated him.• To state future in past.
He thought that the car would not be damaged.
• To express a desire/preference.
I would like you to come to my party.
In the correct option E: The deer,
which traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness where they would be free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, struggled to acclimate to the habitat that wildlife biologists had predicted would enable them to thrive. Here, I am unable to categorize the "they would be" among the four scenarios I mentioned above.
Can you please share some light onto this?
Update:
I was successful in identifying the gap in my understanding of "would". I realised there is a one more scenario where the usage of "would" is apt and my Option E falls into it. That is,
• We also use would to make hypotheses:
When we imagine a situation: 1.
It would be very expensive to stay in a hotel. 2.
I would give you a lift, but my wife has the car today.Here, the author "hypothesized/imagined" that the deers "would" roam freely in the Canadian wilderness. Hence, its usage is correct.
Apologies