Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 18:29 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 18:29
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,754
Own Kudos:
37,011
 [10]
Given Kudos: 4,856
Posts: 4,754
Kudos: 37,011
 [10]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
christran
Joined: 17 Feb 2018
Last visit: 13 Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 75
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
christran
Joined: 17 Feb 2018
Last visit: 13 Jun 2019
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 75
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Nikhil
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 22 May 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 13,199
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3,295
Affiliations: GMATClub
GPA: 3.4
Products:
Posts: 13,199
Kudos: 9,838
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

+1 kudos to the posts containing answer explanations of all questions

User avatar
Gladiator59
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 839
Own Kudos:
2,613
 [3]
Given Kudos: 260
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Posts: 839
Kudos: 2,613
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
6 mins 24 secs... to all correct answers! A good read :-)

The passage starts with why it is important to determine the sources of copper found in bronze age artifacts. Goes on to detail a problem with doing so, how studies up until that point have failed due to various reasons such as poor process back in the day which added many impurities. The author reveals that even though we can identify what all elements & their concentrations are present it becomes impossible to identify the source of copper ore. The author then introduces a new plausible technique of ""composition of isotopes of metals" to possibly determine the ore source but goes on to convey that an element with constant isotopic concentration is needed. The first choice is of copper but differences in isotopic variations of "common copper ore sources" are not high enough for measurement so copper is discarded. Finally, the author settles with lead, whose isotopic variations are constant at common sources of ores and are high enough to be measured. So lead will lead the way :-)

1) The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) discuss the techniques of analyzing lead isotope composition too detailed to be primary purpose
(B) propose a way to determine the origin of the copper in certain artifacts Perfect - the author ends with this note stating that lead isotopic composition is a way to determine origin of copper
(C) resolve a dispute concerning the analysis of copper ore there is no dispute
(D) describe the deficiencies of a currently used method of chemical analysis of certain metals TRAP - this is done but this is not the primary purpose, the first paragraph is used only to set up the scene
(E) offer an interpretation of the archaeological record of the Bronze Age Not quite right, we are looking to identify the sources of copper and not offer an iterpretation. What we offer is more tangible than just an interpretation

Mentioned in the first paragraphs when we are listing the shortcomings of the traditional approach to identifying sources of copper
2) The author first mentions the addition of flux during smelting in order to
(A) give a reason for the failure of elemental composition studies to determine ore sources Perfect - need to realize the context with which the author is mentioning - turn on your critical reasoning brain
(B) illustrate differences between various Bronze Age civilizations Not quite true - just the sources of copper are what we are interested in
(C) show the need for using high smelting temperatures Opposite - this is true but not why the author states this
(D) illustrate the uniformity of lead isotope composition lead isotope is not mentioned here
(E) explain the success of copper isotope composition analysis 180 opposite choice - it is related to the failure and not a success

Straightforward detail question
3) The author suggests which of the following about a Bronze Age artifact containing high concentrations of cobalt or zinc?
(A) It could not be reliably tested for its elemental composition. It has been identified with Cobalt and zinc - so this option is self contradictory
(B) It could not be reliably tested for its copper isotope composition. Not true as per passage
(C) It could not be reliably tested for its lead isotope composition. Not true as per passage
(D) It could have been manufactured from ore from any one of a variety of sources. Perfect - this is verbatim from the passage
(E) It could have been produced by the addition of other metals during the processing of the copper ore. TRAP - a play of words - remember we are talking about artifact here.

Super easydetail question
4) According to the passage, possible sources of the lead found in a copper or bronze artifact include which of the following?
I. The copper ore used to manufacture the artifact CORRECT
II. Flux added during processing of the copper ore CORRECT
III. Other metal added during processing of the copper ore CORRECT

(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II, and III Tick

This is the main point on which the argument of the author in the third paragraph is based - copper is not a good choice even if it was our first choice.
5) The author rejects copper as the "ideal choice" mentioned because
(A) the concentration of copper in Bronze Age artifacts varies Opposite - this could be why it would be a good choice.
(B) elements other than copper may be introduced during smelting Irrelevant as we are talking about isotopic study
(C) the isotopic composition of copper changes during smelting TRAP - could be a likely choice if it were true but this is not true as per what the author mentions in the second paragraph
(D) among common copper ores, differences in copper isotope composition are too small Perfect - exactly what we are looking for - verbatim from the passage
(E) within a single source of copper ore, copper isotope composition can vary substantially If this were true than it would go against - hence this is a trap choice. However, it is not true but this is not why copper is bad - we just cannot measure it that is why it is bad.

6) The author makes which of the following statements about lead isotope composition?
(A) It often varies from one copper-ore source to another. Perfect - and that is why we can use it as a marker to find out the source of copper ore
(B) It sometimes varies over short distances in a single copper-ore source. Not mentioned and would go against the main conclusion of the passage - lead is a good choice.
(C) It can vary during the testing of artifacts, producing a measurement error. Wrong for same reason as above.
(D) It frequently changes during smelting and roasting. Same as above
(E) It may change when artifacts are buried for thousands of years. Nonsensical option. discard.

Twisted detail question but one that is mentioned in the finishing lines of the passage
7) It can be inferred from the passage that the use of flux in processing copper ore can alter the lead isotope composition of the resulting metal EXCEPT when
(A) there is a smaller concentration of lead in the flux than in the copper ore TRAP - real-world trap - could be true but not mentioned
(B) the concentration of lead in the flux is equivalent to that of the lead in the ore TRAP - something is equivalent but not the concentration of lead - it is the isotope that we are lookingfor
(C) some of the lead in the flux evaporates during processing Irrelevant to the question
(D) any lead in the flux has the same isotopic composition as the lead in the ore Perfect - this has been mentioned in the passage as a reason why lead isotope method is reliable
(E) other metals are added during processing Again irrelevant

Hope my comments are useful to you. :-)
User avatar
nitesh50
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Last visit: 09 Aug 2021
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 139
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V32
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 610 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 610 Q48 V25
Posts: 139
Kudos: 69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gladiator59
6 mins 24 secs... to all correct answers! A good read :-)

The passage starts with why it is important to determine the sources of copper found in bronze age artifacts. Goes on to detail a problem with doing so, how studies up until that point have failed due to various reasons such as poor process back in the day which added many impurities. The author reveals that even though we can identify what all elements & their concentrations are present it becomes impossible to identify the source of copper ore. The author then introduces a new plausible technique of ""composition of isotopes of metals" to possibly determine the ore source but goes on to convey that an element with constant isotopic concentration is needed. The first choice is of copper but differences in isotopic variations of "common copper ore sources" are not high enough for measurement so copper is discarded. Finally, the author settles with lead, whose isotopic variations are constant at common sources of ores and are high enough to be measured. So lead will lead the way :-)

1) The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) discuss the techniques of analyzing lead isotope composition too detailed to be primary purpose
(B) propose a way to determine the origin of the copper in certain artifacts Perfect - the author ends with this note stating that lead isotopic composition is a way to determine origin of copper
(C) resolve a dispute concerning the analysis of copper ore there is no dispute
(D) describe the deficiencies of a currently used method of chemical analysis of certain metals TRAP - this is done but this is not the primary purpose, the first paragraph is used only to set up the scene
(E) offer an interpretation of the archaeological record of the Bronze Age Not quite right, we are looking to identify the sources of copper and not offer an iterpretation. What we offer is more tangible than just an interpretation

Mentioned in the first paragraphs when we are listing the shortcomings of the traditional approach to identifying sources of copper
2) The author first mentions the addition of flux during smelting in order to
(A) give a reason for the failure of elemental composition studies to determine ore sources Perfect - need to realize the context with which the author is mentioning - turn on your critical reasoning brain
(B) illustrate differences between various Bronze Age civilizations Not quite true - just the sources of copper are what we are interested in
(C) show the need for using high smelting temperatures Opposite - this is true but not why the author states this
(D) illustrate the uniformity of lead isotope composition lead isotope is not mentioned here
(E) explain the success of copper isotope composition analysis 180 opposite choice - it is related to the failure and not a success

Straightforward detail question
3) The author suggests which of the following about a Bronze Age artifact containing high concentrations of cobalt or zinc?
(A) It could not be reliably tested for its elemental composition. It has been identified with Cobalt and zinc - so this option is self contradictory
(B) It could not be reliably tested for its copper isotope composition. Not true as per passage
(C) It could not be reliably tested for its lead isotope composition. Not true as per passage
(D) It could have been manufactured from ore from any one of a variety of sources. Perfect - this is verbatim from the passage
(E) It could have been produced by the addition of other metals during the processing of the copper ore. TRAP - a play of words - remember we are talking about artifact here.

Super easydetail question
4) According to the passage, possible sources of the lead found in a copper or bronze artifact include which of the following?
I. The copper ore used to manufacture the artifact CORRECT
II. Flux added during processing of the copper ore CORRECT
III. Other metal added during processing of the copper ore CORRECT

(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II, and III Tick

This is the main point on which the argument of the author in the third paragraph is based - copper is not a good choice even if it was our first choice.
5) The author rejects copper as the "ideal choice" mentioned because
(A) the concentration of copper in Bronze Age artifacts varies Opposite - this could be why it would be a good choice.
(B) elements other than copper may be introduced during smelting Irrelevant as we are talking about isotopic study
(C) the isotopic composition of copper changes during smelting TRAP - could be a likely choice if it were true but this is not true as per what the author mentions in the second paragraph
(D) among common copper ores, differences in copper isotope composition are too small Perfect - exactly what we are looking for - verbatim from the passage
(E) within a single source of copper ore, copper isotope composition can vary substantially If this were true than it would go against - hence this is a trap choice. However, it is not true but this is not why copper is bad - we just cannot measure it that is why it is bad.

6) The author makes which of the following statements about lead isotope composition?
(A) It often varies from one copper-ore source to another. Perfect - and that is why we can use it as a marker to find out the source of copper ore
(B) It sometimes varies over short distances in a single copper-ore source. Not mentioned and would go against the main conclusion of the passage - lead is a good choice.
(C) It can vary during the testing of artifacts, producing a measurement error. Wrong for same reason as above.
(D) It frequently changes during smelting and roasting. Same as above
(E) It may change when artifacts are buried for thousands of years. Nonsensical option. discard.

Twisted detail question but one that is mentioned in the finishing lines of the passage
7) It can be inferred from the passage that the use of flux in processing copper ore can alter the lead isotope composition of the resulting metal EXCEPT when
(A) there is a smaller concentration of lead in the flux than in the copper ore TRAP - real-world trap - could be true but not mentioned
(B) the concentration of lead in the flux is equivalent to that of the lead in the ore TRAP - something is equivalent but not the concentration of lead - it is the isotope that we are lookingfor
(C) some of the lead in the flux evaporates during processing Irrelevant to the question
(D) any lead in the flux has the same isotopic composition as the lead in the ore Perfect - this has been mentioned in the passage as a reason why lead isotope method is reliable
(E) other metals are added during processing Again irrelevant

Hope my comments are useful to you. :-)





HI Gladiator59
Great explaination
Great efficiency too
6min WOW!

Now I am a very slow reader, SO it took a significantly higher time.
Nevertheless, I have a doubt in q3.

This is a part of the first passage. Can you tell me why is this portion stated where it has been stated. And what does this exactly mean?
Also Can you provide a reasoning for why Option D for question 3 is the right answer?

Elemental composition can vary within the same copper-ore lode, usually because of varying admixtures of other elements, especially iron, lead, zinc, and arsenic. And high concentrations of cobalt or zinc, noticed in some artifacts, appear in a variety of copper-ore sources. Moreover, the processing of ores introduced poorly controlled changes in the concentrations of minor and trace elements in the resulting metal.


Regards
Nitesh
User avatar
Gladiator59
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 839
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 260
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Posts: 839
Kudos: 2,613
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for the praise :cool:

So for Q3 - cobalt and zinc - check out line 10 of the passage -"And high concentrations of cobalt or zinc, noticed in some artifacts, appear in a variety of copper-ore sources." I think in the context of the passage the author is trying to find markers ( either elements or isotopes of elements) that can reveal the exact source of copper ore which was used to create the artifact and hence find out more about trade & other insights into Bronze age.

So, when the author mentions that when copper with cobalt and zinc high concentrations is found in some artifacts but such copper type appear in various copper ore sources it becomes clear that cobalt and zinc cannot be used to uniquely identify the source. Hence Option (D) fits well.

nitesh50


HI Gladiator59
Great explaination
Great efficiency too
6min WOW!

Now I am a very slow reader, SO it took a significantly higher time.
Nevertheless, I have a doubt in q3.

This is a part of the first passage. Can you tell me why is this portion stated where it has been stated. And what does this exactly mean?
Also Can you provide a reasoning for why Option D for question 3 is the right answer?

Elemental composition can vary within the same copper-ore lode, usually because of varying admixtures of other elements, especially iron, lead, zinc, and arsenic. And high concentrations of cobalt or zinc, noticed in some artifacts, appear in a variety of copper-ore sources. Moreover, the processing of ores introduced poorly controlled changes in the concentrations of minor and trace elements in the resulting metal.


Regards
Nitesh
User avatar
nitesh50
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Last visit: 09 Aug 2021
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 139
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V32
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 610 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 610 Q48 V25
Posts: 139
Kudos: 69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gladiator59
Thanks for the praise :cool:

So for Q3 - cobalt and zinc - check out line 10 of the passage -"And high concentrations of cobalt or zinc, noticed in some artifacts, appear in a variety of copper-ore sources." I think in the context of the passage the author is trying to find markers ( either elements or isotopes of elements) that can reveal the exact source of copper ore which was used to create the artifact and hence find out more about trade & other insights into Bronze age.

So, when the author mentions that when copper with cobalt and zinc high concentrations is found in some artifacts but such copper type appear in various copper ore sources it becomes clear that cobalt and zinc cannot be used to uniquely identify the source. Hence Option (D) fits well.

nitesh50


HI Gladiator59
Great explaination
Great efficiency too
6min WOW!

Now I am a very slow reader, SO it took a significantly higher time.
Nevertheless, I have a doubt in q3.

This is a part of the first passage. Can you tell me why is this portion stated where it has been stated. And what does this exactly mean?
Also Can you provide a reasoning for why Option D for question 3 is the right answer?

Elemental composition can vary within the same copper-ore lode, usually because of varying admixtures of other elements, especially iron, lead, zinc, and arsenic. And high concentrations of cobalt or zinc, noticed in some artifacts, appear in a variety of copper-ore sources. Moreover, the processing of ores introduced poorly controlled changes in the concentrations of minor and trace elements in the resulting metal.


Regards
Nitesh



Hi Gladiator59

I still don't get it. Geography and minerals were never my good friends. So we don't get along much.
SO I will try explaining to you the part where I am having problems in.
Perhaps you can figure my problem out.


Elemental composition can vary within the same copper-ore lode, usually because of varying admixtures of other elements, especially iron, lead, zinc, and arsenic.


SO the author in the previous sentence said that the studies were unsuccessful in identifying the sources of copper. SO this might be the reason for the difficulty.
The elemental composition i.e the elements in the copper ore vary because of the different mixtures of other materials.

Question still unanswered: How does elemental composition create a problem?

And high concentrations of cobalt or zinc, noticed in some artifacts, appear in a variety of copper-ore sources.


Another type of minerals: Cobalt and zinc appear in high concentrations in artifacts. so the elemental composition may also have cobalt or zinc.



Option D: artifacts could have been manufactured from ore from any one of a variety of sources.
Now how does the author derive this statement?

I feel IMO Option A makes slightly more sense:
A) It could not be reliably tested for its elemental composition.

Since there were so may elements, testing it for elemental composition became difficult.


Looking forward to your reply.

Thank you for your Time

Regards
User avatar
Gladiator59
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 839
Own Kudos:
2,613
 [2]
Given Kudos: 260
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Posts: 839
Kudos: 2,613
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please find my detailed respones in-line. This should clear all your doubts. :-)

nitesh50


Hi Gladiator59

I still don't get it. Geography and minerals were never my good friends. So we don't get along much. I am in the same category - however, here I feel one just needs to employ reasoning skills as everything else feels logical
SO I will try explaining to you the part where I am having problems in.
Perhaps you can figure my problem out.


Elemental composition can vary within the same copper-ore lode, usually because of varying admixtures of other elements, especially iron, lead, zinc, and arsenic.


SO the author in the previous sentence said that the studies were unsuccessful in identifying the sources of copper. SO this might be the reason for the difficulty.
The elemental composition i.e the elements in the copper ore vary because of the different mixtures of other materials. The elements vary in the ore but this is just a fact - this does not entail a causal relationship like you pointed out in the part which I struck-through

Question still unanswered: How does elemental composition create a problem? This I feel is more of a main point thing - the main idea of the passage is linking "source of copper" to artifacts. and not finding elemental composition or anything else... those are just the means to the end

And high concentrations of cobalt or zinc, noticed in some artifacts, appear in a variety of copper-ore sources.


Another type of minerals: Cobalt and zinc appear in high concentrations in artifacts. so the elemental composition may also have cobalt or zinc. Perfectly captured but you missed the crux of what the author wanted to convey - which I pointed out in my previous post let me do it again :-) - "Since high conc of cobalt & zinc -> variety of ore sources .. therefore, we cannot link an artifact with high conc of cobalt & zinc to a particular source... it could be from any of the various possibilities"



Option D: artifacts could have been manufactured from ore from any one of a variety of sources.
Now how does the author derive this statement? That is how... read my comments above - it is pretty clear. No debates to this OA.

I feel IMO Option A makes slightly more sense:
A) It could not be reliably tested for its elemental composition. Again - you are falling for the traps - the artifact can definitely be tested for elemental composition but the elemental composition cannot be reliably used to detect the source of copper ore

Think on these lines - in the context of getting a blood report from a doctor to test for malaria. Not being able to get a blood report is not the same as not being able to ascertain if you have malaria or not from a blood report. :-)

Since there were so may elements, testing it for elemental composition became difficult.


Looking forward to your reply.

Thank you for your Time

Regards
User avatar
QuabityAssurance
User avatar
BSchool Moderator
Joined: 24 Nov 2019
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 693
Own Kudos:
403
 [1]
Given Kudos: 93
Location: India
GRE 1: Q166 V159
GRE 2: Q165 V156
GRE 3: Q166 V159
GPA: 3.85
GRE 1: Q166 V159
GRE 2: Q165 V156
GRE 3: Q166 V159
Posts: 693
Kudos: 403
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
15 min 46 seconds including the read time . All correct.
One of the easy ones on Old GRE.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,835
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,835
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17289 posts
188 posts