6 mins 24 secs... to all correct answers! A good read

The passage starts with why it is important to determine the sources of copper found in bronze age artifacts. Goes on to detail a problem with doing so, how studies up until that point have failed due to various reasons such as poor process back in the day which added many impurities. The author reveals that even though we can identify what all elements & their concentrations are present it becomes impossible to identify the source of copper ore. The author then introduces a new plausible technique of ""composition of isotopes of metals" to possibly determine the ore source but goes on to convey that an element with constant isotopic concentration is needed. The first choice is of copper but differences in isotopic variations of "common copper ore sources" are not high enough for measurement so copper is discarded. Finally, the author settles with lead, whose isotopic variations are constant at common sources of ores and are high enough to be measured. So lead will lead the way

1) The primary purpose of the passage is to (A) discuss the techniques of analyzing lead isotope composition
too detailed to be primary purpose(B) propose a way to determine the origin of the copper in certain artifacts
Perfect - the author ends with this note stating that lead isotopic composition is a way to determine origin of copper(C) resolve a dispute concerning the analysis of copper ore
there is no dispute(D) describe the deficiencies of a currently used method of chemical analysis of certain metals
TRAP - this is done but this is not the primary purpose, the first paragraph is used only to set up the scene (E) offer an interpretation of the archaeological record of the Bronze Age
Not quite right, we are looking to identify the sources of copper and not offer an iterpretation. What we offer is more tangible than just an interpretationMentioned in the first paragraphs when we are listing the shortcomings of the traditional approach to identifying sources of copper2) The author first mentions the addition of flux during smelting in order to (A) give a reason for the failure of elemental composition studies to determine ore sources
Perfect - need to realize the context with which the author is mentioning - turn on your critical reasoning brain(B) illustrate differences between various Bronze Age civilizations
Not quite true - just the sources of copper are what we are interested in(C) show the need for using high smelting temperatures
Opposite - this is true but not why the author states this(D) illustrate the uniformity of lead isotope composition
lead isotope is not mentioned here(E) explain the success of copper isotope composition analysis
180 opposite choice - it is related to the failure and not a successStraightforward detail question3) The author suggests which of the following about a Bronze Age artifact containing high concentrations of cobalt or zinc? (A) It could not be reliably tested for its elemental composition.
It has been identified with Cobalt and zinc - so this option is self contradictory(B) It could not be reliably tested for its copper isotope composition.
Not true as per passage(C) It could not be reliably tested for its lead isotope composition.
Not true as per passage(D) It could have been manufactured from ore from any one of a variety of sources.
Perfect - this is verbatim from the passage (E) It could have been produced by the addition of other metals during the processing of the copper ore.
TRAP - a play of words - remember we are talking about artifact here.Super easydetail question4) According to the passage, possible sources of the lead found in a copper or bronze artifact include which of the following? I. The copper ore used to manufacture the artifact
CORRECT II. Flux added during processing of the copper ore
CORRECTIII. Other metal added during processing of the copper ore
CORRECT(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II, and III
TickThis is the main point on which the argument of the author in the third paragraph is based - copper is not a good choice even if it was our first choice.5) The author rejects copper as the "ideal choice" mentioned because (A) the concentration of copper in Bronze Age artifacts varies
Opposite - this could be why it would be a good choice.(B) elements other than copper may be introduced during smelting
Irrelevant as we are talking about isotopic study(C) the isotopic composition of copper changes during smelting
TRAP - could be a likely choice if it were true but this is not true as per what the author mentions in the second paragraph(D) among common copper ores, differences in copper isotope composition are too small
Perfect - exactly what we are looking for - verbatim from the passage(E) within a single source of copper ore, copper isotope composition can vary substantially
If this were true than it would go against - hence this is a trap choice. However, it is not true but this is not why copper is bad - we just cannot measure it that is why it is bad.6) The author makes which of the following statements about lead isotope composition? (A) It often varies from one copper-ore source to another.
Perfect - and that is why we can use it as a marker to find out the source of copper ore(B) It sometimes varies over short distances in a single copper-ore source.
Not mentioned and would go against the main conclusion of the passage - lead is a good choice.(C) It can vary during the testing of artifacts, producing a measurement error.
Wrong for same reason as above.(D) It frequently changes during smelting and roasting.
Same as above(E) It may change when artifacts are buried for thousands of years.
Nonsensical option. discard.Twisted detail question but one that is mentioned in the finishing lines of the passage7) It can be inferred from the passage that the use of flux in processing copper ore can alter the lead isotope composition of the resulting metal EXCEPT when (A) there is a smaller concentration of lead in the flux than in the copper ore
TRAP - real-world trap - could be true but not mentioned(B) the concentration of lead in the flux is equivalent to that of the lead in the ore
TRAP - something is equivalent but not the concentration of lead - it is the isotope that we are lookingfor(C) some of the lead in the flux evaporates during processing
Irrelevant to the question(D) any lead in the flux has the same isotopic composition as the lead in the ore
Perfect - this has been mentioned in the passage as a reason why lead isotope method is reliable(E) other metals are added during processing
Again irrelevantHope my comments are useful to you.