Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 10:08 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 10:08
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
705-805 Level|   Assumption|      
User avatar
Vaishali2004
User avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2021
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 83
Own Kudos:
22
Given Kudos: 85
Schools: ISB '27 (WL)
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 2: 640 Q46 V31
GMAT 3: 640 Q48 V31
GMAT 4: 700 Q45 V40
Schools: ISB '27 (WL)
GMAT 4: 700 Q45 V40
Posts: 83
Kudos: 22
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. 28 May 2022, 00:22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Choice A - Even if the rate of deposit of salt was not constant. We could still determine the age by assuming that a constant amount being depotited. That way, we would end up determining higher age of earth than in real. But the conclusion mentions "maximum age" So then wouldn't that still be okay?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,784
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,784
 [1]
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. 03 Jun 2022, 13:47
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vaishali2004
Choice A - Even if the rate of deposit of salt was not constant. We could still determine the age by assuming that a constant amount being depotited. That way, we would end up determining higher age of earth than in real. But the conclusion mentions "maximum age" So then wouldn't that still be okay?
Show more
Let's say that salt deposits HAVE been unusually high in the past century. If you used this data and mistakenly said that the same thing happened in previous centuries, you'd come up with a time estimate that is too short (as in, you'd think that the water got saltier in a shorter amount of time than it actually took). This would give you a (faulty) maximum age that is too recent. The actual maximum age would be older than your estimate.

So, you need to assume that quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.

That's why (A) is an assumption on which the argument depends.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
debojyoti25
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2022
Last visit: 10 Jan 2025
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
1
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. 31 Jul 2022, 06:31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bb
ttram
msday86
I think the assumption is that the increase in salt level is constant throughout time. So, I think A is the answer. If the increase in level over the last 100 years in unusually high, then that invalidates the method.

I agree with you that A is right. However, what do you think about E?

After re-reading choice E several times (which I may not have done on the real GMAT), it seems to be irrelevant.
The argument says to take the difference between salt levels today and 100 years ago and then divide the total salt level by the difference. Choice E says that there may be some biological activities using up the salts, which is fine since these biological activities have been active longer than 100 years, so they are a constant. Every 100 years these biological activities consumed the same amount of salt. Surprisingly, choice E can be ruled out mathematically.
Show more
User avatar
jabhatta2
User avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
317
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 317
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. 01 Aug 2022, 08:26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi avigutman - i selected (A). Quick question on (E).

When i read the argument, essentially the argument is saying : divide the the Green (Numerator) / Blue (Denominator) : You will get the age of the river.

Question on (E).

I did not select (E) because i thought (E) was baked into to the calculations of the green (numerator) to begin with.

Question - is (E) baked into the calculation of
(i) BOTH, the green and the blue
or
(ii) just the blue only
or
(iii) just the green only

As long as (E) is baked into one of these three options - we can eliminate (E) but i was curious
Attachments

screneshot 4.png
screneshot 4.png [ 35.05 KiB | Viewed 1755 times ]

User avatar
avigutman
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1,293
Own Kudos:
1,931
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
Schools: NYU Stern (WA)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: NYU Stern (WA)
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,293
Kudos: 1,931
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. 01 Aug 2022, 19:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta2
Hi avigutman - i selected (A). Quick question on (E).

When i read the argument, essentially the argument is saying : divide the the Green (Numerator) / Blue (Denominator) : You will get the age of the river.

Question on (E).

I did not select (E) because i thought (E) was baked into to the calculations of the green (numerator) to begin with.

Question - is (E) baked into the calculation of
(i) BOTH, the green and the blue
or
(ii) just the blue only
or
(iii) just the green only

As long as (E) is baked into one of these three options - we can eliminate (E) but i was curious
Show more
We can eliminate (E) because it's "baked in" to both the green and the blue. If it were only "baked in" to one of them, that would be a problem. We need the consistency in order for the calculation to be meaningful, jabhatta2.
User avatar
MBAcandidate1005
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2018
Last visit: 03 May 2023
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
5
Given Kudos: 14
GRE 1: Q166 V153
GRE 1: Q166 V153
Posts: 22
Kudos: 5
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. 23 Nov 2022, 23:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Zatarra
hibloom

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
(B) At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.
(C) There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.
(D) There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.
(E) None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.
i was a difficult choice between a and e.
I eliminated E with the foll. reasoning.
If at the beginning of the last century,the ocean contained x kgs of salt.
If in the last 100 years , 100 kgs of ice was dropped into the ocean by the rivers.
and suppose that in the past 100 yrs 5 kgs of salt was used up by the ocean because of its biological activity.
then 95 kgs was dropped in the last century.
So the level becomes x + 95
still we can find out the age of the ocean by taking 95 kgs as the average increase in 1 century.
Show more

But the option does not say in the last 100 years. It could be any of the set of 100 years and can change average salt in that particular slot of 100 years. How does it not affect the amount of the salt/100 years?
User avatar
Raman109
User avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
170
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 805
Kudos: 170
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. 23 Sep 2023, 05:15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pre-thinking - We assume that the deposition of salts has been pretty consistent. What if in the last 100 years, the deposition of slats was extremely high say because of industrial activity then the maximum age of Earth's oceans can't be accurately estimated.

(A) The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years. - in line with our pre-thinking.

(B) At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels. - Doesn't matter. Irrelevant.

(C) There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor. - At best, a weakener.

(D) There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans. - Not an assumption. The argument doesn't say that this is the superior method.

(E) None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans. - At best, it's a strengthener. But it is not a necessary condition. Say we negate this - Some (at least 2 - say 2 kgs, for example) of salts ....are used for biological activity...does it even matter? No.
User avatar
anikpait17
User avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2023
Last visit: 06 Apr 2024
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
16
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 18
Kudos: 16
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. 04 Dec 2023, 09:22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I got that the answer is A but everyone is ignoring D. I wanted to understand why?
Lets say There is a superior method than the current method to determine the ocean's age, it means that the earlier method that has been used for the same is inaccurate because we have a better method to ensure accuracy?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,784
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,784
 [1]
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. 16 Dec 2023, 10:19
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
anikpait17
I got that the answer is A but everyone is ignoring D. I wanted to understand why?

Lets say There is a superior method than the current method to determine the ocean's age, it means that the earlier method that has been used for the same is inaccurate because we have a better method to ensure accuracy?
Show more
Having a "superior" method doesn't necessarily mean that the inferior method is inaccurate -- both methods could be quite accurate, but if one is slightly better, you'd have to call that one superior.

The superior method might also be superior for other reasons aside from accuracy -- maybe that method is easier, faster, or cheaper, for example.

Having a superior method wouldn't necessarily invalidate the argument, so (D) is not a required assumption.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
arjunsathish
User avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2025
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
1
Given Kudos: 83
Products:
Forum Quiz
Posts: 8
Kudos: 1
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. 30 Jul 2025, 04:44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In this question the authors conclusion is that we can predict the maximum age of the oceans , Lets first negate A , if large quantities of salt were dissolved in the past 100 years , We can still get the MAXIMUM age of the oceans , We are not looking for the exact age , we are looking for a maximum. If we were to negate E , and a large quantity of the oceans salt were taken by the ocean for biological process there would be lesser salt in comparison to the actual value , when calculated using this value we would get a value which is lesser than the maximum value , hence the maximum value would be inaccurate . Even option A is a good option and by Option A we would get a inflated maximum value .. I honestly don't know which is better
durgesh79
between A and E...
one of the best ways for CR assumption questions
negate the assumption and the argument should fall apart.

negate E
Some of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.
OK.. but if the portion of salt consumed by biological activities has remained constant over the years ... we can still predict the age of the oceans ... the argument doesnt fall apart

negate A
The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have been unusually large during the past hundred years.
it means that the rate has not been constant .... we cant predict the age .... agrument falls apart ...

right Option A
Show more
User avatar
nazii
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2021
Last visit: 04 Aug 2025
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
67
Given Kudos: 279
Posts: 53
Kudos: 67
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. 04 Aug 2025, 19:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I found that GMAT has such radicicolous reasoning that even AIs cannot respond to its question!!! We should laugh or cry?!
ttram
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the ocean to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth's oceans can be accurately estimated.

Which of the following is the assumption on which the argument depends?


(A) The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.

(B) At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.

(C) There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.

(D) There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.

(E) None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.
Show more
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,784
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,784
 [1]
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. 11 Aug 2025, 15:12
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
arjunsathish
In this question the authors conclusion is that we can predict the maximum age of the oceans , Lets first negate A , if large quantities of salt were dissolved in the past 100 years , We can still get the MAXIMUM age of the oceans , We are not looking for the exact age , we are looking for a maximum. If we were to negate E , and a large quantity of the oceans salt were taken by the ocean for biological process there would be lesser salt in comparison to the actual value , when calculated using this value we would get a value which is lesser than the maximum value , hence the maximum value would be inaccurate . Even option A is a good option and by Option A we would get a inflated maximum value .. I honestly don't know which is better
Show more
It's actually the other way around, as explained in this post: https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-earth-s- ... l#p3025048.

In case that isn't clear, let's say that there are currently 10 million units of dissolved salts in the ocean, and that the oceans were salt-free 10 million years ago. That means the salts were added at an average rate of 1 unit per year.

But maybe the rate was unusually high the past hundred years (say, 10 units per year). If we use that rate along with the current salt level (10 million units), we'll determine that the oceans were salt free only 1 million years ago. In that case, we would greatly underestimate the maximum age of the oceans.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts