Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

 It is currently 21 Jul 2019, 21:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2007
Posts: 21
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 18 Dec 2018, 04:21
9
68
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

45% (01:47) correct 55% (01:54) wrong based on 1378 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the ocean to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth's oceans can be accurately estimate.

Which of the following is the assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.

(B) At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.

(C) There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.

(D) There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.

(E) None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.

Originally posted by ttram on 06 Jan 2008, 17:04.
Last edited by Bunuel on 18 Dec 2018, 04:21, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 17846
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2008, 19:02
14
1
2
ttram wrote:
msday86 wrote:
I think the assumption is that the increase in salt level is constant throughout time. So, I think A is the answer. If the increase in level over the last 100 years in unusually high, then that invalidates the method.

I agree with you that A is right. However, what do you think about E?

After re-reading choice E several times (which I may not have done on the real GMAT), it seems to be irrelevant.
The argument says to take the difference between salt levels today and 100 years ago and then divide the total salt level by the difference. Choice E says that there may be some biological activities using up the salts, which is fine since these biological activities have been active longer than 100 years, so they are a constant. Every 100 years these biological activities consumed the same amount of salt. Surprisingly, choice E can be ruled out mathematically.
_________________
Founder of GMAT Club

Just starting out with GMAT? Start here...
New! OG2020 Directory !
Want to know application stats & Profiles from last year? Check the Decision Tracker

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 499
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2008, 22:23
59
16
between A and E...
one of the best ways for CR assumption questions
negate the assumption and the argument should fall apart.

negate E
Some of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.
OK.. but if the portion of salt consumed by biological activities has remained constant over the years ... we can still predict the age of the oceans ... the argument doesnt fall apart

negate A
The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have been unusually large during the past hundred years.
it means that the rate has not been constant .... we cant predict the age .... agrument falls apart ...

right Option A
##### General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2007
Posts: 21
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jan 2008, 12:33
4
ttram wrote:
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the ocean to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth's oceans can be accurately estimate.

Which of the following is the assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
B. At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.
C. There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.
D. There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.
E. None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.

We can eliminate B, C and D after reading.
The argument is talking about: We can guess the maximum Earth's age when we calculate dissolved salts from rivers to oceans with the premise is at the first time, the salt level of oceans is zero.

B: Irrelevant because we do not discuss about salt level in rivers. It does not lead us to the conclusion.
C: Irrelevant, too.
D: Although it seems to be a right answer because it talks about a method. However, it is too general, and not assume anything.
E: The first time, I think E is the best answer. However, it is a mistake. First, it is too specific. If none of the salts were used by biological activity, so, how about other activities? (such as physical activity, chemical activity...)? Second, it does not lead us to a conclusion. We cannot conclude that the method is accurate because of the premise E.
A: It supports the premise:
Premise:
- At the first time, the salt level of oceans is zero.
- We calculate the salt level of oceans in the past hundred years, and we can know the Earth's age.
- In a process, the quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
- Thus, we can convince that the result is believable.

I hope that you guys can accept my explanation.
Manager
Joined: 11 Apr 2008
Posts: 128
Schools: Kellogg(A), Wharton(W), Columbia(D)
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jun 2008, 13:59
2
lexis wrote:
The Earth’s rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the oceans to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans can be accurately estimated.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
B. At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.
C. There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.
D. There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.
E. None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.

Consider A,
A. The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.

Negate it ->

The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have been unusually large during the past hundred years.

Clearly then our experiment to determine age of the oceans will fail.
So, this is an assumption the argument relies upon.

IMO - A
Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 505
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2008, 07:06
1
IMO E.
* The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
Deposit could be large but that never hampers the result
* At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.
OOS
* There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.
OOS
* There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.
OOS
* None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.
If biological process uses the same salt, concentration will definitely fall
_________________
If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space
Director
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 635
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2008, 19:37
5
2
priyankur_saha@ml.com wrote:
IMO E.
* The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
Deposit could be large but that never hampers the result

If the quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have been unusually large during the past hundred years , it will surely affect the result.

Consider the salts deposited in the past century is X.

The current salt level is say 5X

so as per the result ocean's age is 5 centuries.

But if X is unusually large and the deposited salt level of previous centuries were say only X/4 per century then the result will have a blunder!
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 364
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2010, 08:29
1
hibloom wrote:
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
(B) At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.
(C) There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.
(D) There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.
(E) None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.

i was a difficult choice between a and e.
I eliminated E with the foll. reasoning.
If at the beginning of the last century,the ocean contained x kgs of salt.
If in the last 100 years , 100 kgs of ice was dropped into the ocean by the rivers.
and suppose that in the past 100 yrs 5 kgs of salt was used up by the ocean because of its biological activity.
then 95 kgs was dropped in the last century.
So the level becomes x + 95
still we can find out the age of the ocean by taking 95 kgs as the average increase in 1 century.
_________________
My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Senior Manager
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 346
Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2010, 19:24
1
I initially had a strong urge to choose E after I narrowed down A and E.

However after some time thought option E could be broken but not A. Here is why:

Option E talks about "none of the salt getting used up". By taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years we could accommodate the the condition wherein some of the salt is being used up.

Hence option E is not the safe assumption to make. Hence A is the answer.
_________________
Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 128
WE 1: 4 years Software Product Development
WE 2: 3 years ERP Consulting
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2010, 20:10
1
Has to be A as biological activity will happen every year.

So if rivers bring salt S and biological consumption is s then for a year the Salt increase would be S-s.
So even if we look at a long period every year s amount of salt gets consumed by biological consumption.
That way we can calculate the no of years based on X/(S-s) where X is total increase in the Salt content. So biological activity should not be a problem.

Thanks
Arun
_________________
Intern
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 32
Location: India
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2011, 23:18
1
hibloom wrote:
The Earth’s rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the oceans to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans can be accurately estimated.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
(B) At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.
(C) There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.
(D) There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.
(E) None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.

The method is purely based on the observations from the past 100 years, so we need to something which points out the flaw in this method.

(A) The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years. CORRECT. this says the rate of salt deposited in the last 100 years is unusually high. This clearly weakens the argument.
(B) At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels. irrelevant
(C) There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor. if salt leaches into the oceans directly, it would have done so in the past 100 years as well. so it doesnt point to a flaw in the proposed method.
(D) There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.
Ignore it
(E) None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.
if oceans use salt for biological activities. it would have done so in the past 100 years as well. so it doesnt point to a flaw in the proposed method
_________________
The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It's a very mean and nasty place and I don't care how tough you are it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently if you let it. You, me, or nobody is gonna hit as hard as life. But it ain't about how hard ya hit. It's about how hard you can get it and keep moving forward. How much you can take and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done!
Intern
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 9
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Schools: HKUST, ISB
GMAT Date: 11-20-2011
GPA: 3.6
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2011, 19:37
1
1
A tough one and after much deliberation I choose option A.

To simplify this lets consider that I can walk at a constant rate of 10 km/hr. On a given day I walk 20 kms. It took me 2 hours to cover the distance. The result (time to cover the distance) is depending on the walking rate and not the distance I covered. If I start walking at a higher rate it will take me less time to cover the distance.

Similarly the age of the ocean = Increase in salt level/rate of deposition per century. The assumption is that the rate of deposition is constant; otherwise the result will be inaccurate.

Option A: The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years. –this means that the rate of deposition is constant and thus we can accurately calculate the age of the ocean.

Using method of negation
Option E – All (polar opposite of none) of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans. – extreme assumption. Moreover it doesn’t weaken the conclusion as we can still calculate the age of the ocean.

Option A - The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have been unusually large during the past hundred years. – the rate of deposition is not constant. The conclusion falls apart. We can’t accurately calculate the age of the ocean
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 415
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2013, 02:01
1
Level of salt in the ocean = could be use to predict the age of oceans...
How? determining the number of centuries it took to reach current salt-level from less-salt state...

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
If salt level in the past was also unusually large as now, then perhaps there is no such thing as increase in salt levels that could help determine the age...

(B) At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.
Rivers can have different salt levels and the conclusion will still hold... This is not assumed...

(C) There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.
If there are salts from the ocean floor and salts from river, the comparison of the levels of salt today and past hundred years will still work as an age determinant... TThe conclusion will still hold...

(D) There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.
Extreme... There's no claim about the superiority of these method compared to other methods...

(E) None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.
Even if salts are used up by the oceans, as long as that consumption rate is the same althroughout.. the method will still work.. This trap is similar to (C) in that it introduces factors other than rivers to contribute to change in salt levels... (e.g. Ocean floor and Biological Process) as long as the salt levels did increase from past to now... then the method will work...

_________________
Impossible is nothing to God.
Intern
Status: Single
Affiliations: B.Tech
Joined: 04 Sep 2013
Posts: 5
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2013, 02:17
1
A will be the correct answer .

E states that the salt is not being used by any biological activity . But , if we are to measure the age of the oceans this will not hamper that measurement as the quantity of salt, if being used by any biological activity would have been constant since the beginning . So , that constant will not affect the measurement .

A assumes that the quantity of salts deposited in recent hundred years is larger than other hundreds of years , thus the experiment will give an inconsistent answer .

Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 836
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2014, 11:53
lexis wrote:
The Earth’s rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the oceans to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans can be accurately estimated.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
B. At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.
C. There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.
D. There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.
E. None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.

Conclusion : By measuring the increase in salt over the past hundred years and by extrapolating the results, we can determine the maximum age of the Earth's Ocean.

Option A) Negation :
The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have been unusually large during the past hundred years.
More quantities of salt is added in the past 100 years, So if we extrapolate it over thousand of years, the years required will be lesser as compared to the actual age. That can impact the Maximum age calculation. Hence an assumption.

Option B) Doesn't matter as argument talks about the cumulative salt in the ocean.
Option C) Salt leach into the Earth's ocean from the floor. This would be captured the data for the last 100 years and it will be constant over the years. Hence it doesn't affect.
Option D) Out of scope.
Option E) Negation.
Some of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.
In that case, this would be factored in the measurement done for the past 100 years and can be extrapolated over the thousands of years.

hence A)

BTW : It is from GMATPrep Question Pack 1.
_________________
Thanks,
Kinjal

My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961

Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1329
Location: Malaysia
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 May 2017, 07:40
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the ocean to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth's oceans can be accurately estimate.

Which of the following is the assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth's oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.

(B) At any given time, all the Earth's rivers have about the same salt levels.

(C) There are salts that leach into the Earth's oceans directly from the ocean floor.

(D) There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth's oceans.

(E) None of the salts carried into the Earth's oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.

GMATNinja & GMATNinjaTwo (A), (B) and (E) are pretty close to each other. How to eliminate the incorrect answer choices?
_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2676
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 May 2017, 18:26
2
hazelnut wrote:
The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the ocean to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth's oceans can be accurately estimate.

Which of the following is the assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth's oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.

(B) At any given time, all the Earth's rivers have about the same salt levels.

(C) There are salts that leach into the Earth's oceans directly from the ocean floor.

(D) There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth's oceans.

(E) None of the salts carried into the Earth's oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.

GMATNinja & GMATNinjaTwo (A), (B) and (E) are pretty close to each other. How to eliminate the incorrect answer choices?

As for choice (B), we don't care about the relative salt levels in the individual rivers, only about the cumulative amount of salt carried into the oceans. It doesn't matter if some rivers carry more salt than others.

As for choice (E), "taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years" will tell us how much the salt levels increased DESPITE loss of salt due to biological activity (or any other factor that would reduce salt levels in the ocean). If the impact of these factors is small, these factors will not significantly affect the calculations. In other words, it is okay if A SMALL AMOUNT of salt is used up by biological activity in the oceans.

This thread contains several other posts explaining (B) and (E), so please review these before posting additional questions.
_________________
GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (we're hiring!) | GMAT Club Verbal Expert | Instagram | Blog | Bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal: RC | CR | SC

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars: Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations: All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button; be specific about your question, and tag @GMATNinja. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

SC articles & resources: How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

RC, CR, and other articles & resources: All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal
Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 630
Location: India
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jun 2017, 01:29
Assume we know in hundred years salt level increases by 10 units and 1 unit is used by biological activity. So effectively salt level increases by 9 units every hundred years. So if we know increase in the salt level in the past hundred years ,we can find out how long it took to reach the current level from salt free level even if some salt is used by biological activity. The biological activity would have been there all along. E need not be assumed
_________________
Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna Test Prep
http://www.sravnatestprep.com

Holistic and Systematic Approach
Intern
Joined: 27 Oct 2018
Posts: 46
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.9
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2019, 02:37
B is irrelevant, the level of salt in the rivers has nothing to do with the conclusion. C actually harms the argument, since it tells us that there is another sources of salt for the ocean. D is irrelevant, we are only concerned with the validity of this method not its validity in relation to others. E seems good but it is not specific enough, it tells us that the biological activities of the oceans are not affecting the salt levels but non-biological activities till might.

So, A is the right answer.
Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2017
Posts: 135
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
Schools: LBS '21, ISB '20, IE '22
GPA: 3.6
WE: Marketing (Entertainment and Sports)
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2019, 01:56
We can eliminate B, C and D after reading.
The argument is talking about: We can guess the maximum Earth's age when we calculate dissolved salts from rivers to oceans with the premise is at the first time, the salt level of oceans is zero.

B: Irrelevant because we do not discuss about salt level in rivers. It does not lead us to the conclusion.
C: Irrelevant, too.
D: Although it seems to be a right answer because it talks about a method. However, it is too general, and not assume anything.
E: The first time, I think E is the best answer. However, it is a mistake. First, it is too specific. If none of the salts were used by biological activity, so, how about other activities? (such as physical activity, chemical activity...)? Second, it does not lead us to a conclusion. We cannot conclude that the method is accurate because of the premise E.
A: It supports the premise:
Premise:
- At the first time, the salt level of oceans is zero.
- We calculate the salt level of oceans in the past hundred years, and we can know the Earth's age.
- In a process, the quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
- Thus, we can convince that the result is believable.
Re: The Earth's rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.   [#permalink] 07 Jul 2019, 01:56

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by