woohoo921
GMATNinja
krittapat
GMATNinja karishmaBmikemcgarryCould you please explain why option C is better than option A?
What makes option A wrong here?
I chose A because it follows subjunctive mood.
The parallelism in (A) creates an illogical meaning. Take another look:
Quote:
The Eastern State Penitentiary was established in 1822 by reformers advocating that prisoners be held in solitary confinement and hard labor so as to reform them.
Here, the parallel elements are "solitary confinement" and "hard labor," making it seems as though prisoners are held
in solitary confinement and held
in hard labor. You can
do hard labor. You can
recommend hard labor. But
held in hard labor? Nah.
Contrast that with (C):
Quote:
The Eastern State Penitentiary was established in 1822 by reformers advocating solitary confinement and hard labor as the means to reform prisoners.
Notice that the same two elements are parallel, but now the both are preceded by "advocating," so the reformers were
advocating solitary confinement and
advocating hard labor. That makes way more sense.
Because (C) creates a more logical meaning than (A), it's a better answer. Simple as that.
I hope that helps!
GMATNinjaThank you for this helpful explanation. I am hoping to clarify with you on the discussion of the "them" being a vague pronoun in Choice A.
This is INCORRECT because it uses a vague pronoun! It’s unclear in the sentence if the pronoun “them” is referring to the prisoners reforming themselves, or if the prisoners are reforming the reformers.
I remember your very helpful lesson on the word "they" in that if "they" appears after a subject, it must logically refer back to the subject. Why doesn't "them" work similar to "they" in that it refers back to the closest subject... the "prisoners" in Choice A?
Thank you for all of your help.
The usage of "them" isn't a great reason to eliminate (A). After all, the closest plural noun is "prisoners," and that makes perfect sense.
(Note that "them" can never be the subject of a sentence, so this scenario is different than the one we discussed earlier in which "they" was the subject. But ultimately, the litmus test for pronoun usage is whether there's
something that makes sense as an antecedent. If there is, we don't want to treat it as a concrete error.)
It's better to rely on the illogical meaning we explain in our earlier post: (A) makes it sound as though the prisoners are held
in hard labor. You can
do hard labor. But you can't be
in it.
Quote:
Could you also please further explain the difference between "at sometime" vs "sometime" vs "some time"?
It's highly unlikely that this distinction will make any sort of difference on your exam, but here goes:
- "Sometime": this suggests a range during which an action might happen. "Sometime between 3 and 4, Tim will finally feed his children lunch." It could happen at 3:05. It could happen at 3:57. All we know is that the feeding will occur within the specified range.
- If there's a difference between "at sometime" and "sometime", it's subtle enough that I wouldn't worry about it.
- "Some time": this suggests an action performed over an interval of time. "Tim spent some time in Tibet, irritating monks and angering wisdom-seekers." So Tim was being a nuisance in Tibet over an extended period.
But again, I wouldn't agonize too much over these distinctions.
I hope that helps!