KarishmaB GMATNinja sayantanc2kCan you please shed some light on whether the question is accurate and whether option E can be correct? My concerns are:
Option E - "The Federal Reserve bond buyback program has buoyed Wall Street
, and helped the stock market reach record highs
, but has not translated into consistent job growth across the country."
1) Is it valid to have an apostrophe after "Wallstreet", as there are 2 things that the program has done and 1 thing the program hasn't done yet. So the ideal construction should be "Did A and B, but did not do C"
2) As per the official explanation, option E was rejected for the following reason - "In (A) and (E) you cannot say: the reserve has buoyed, and helped, but yet to translate or but has not translated. Because of the “and” after the first part, a new clause must be created to follow “but”".
My concern is that though the concept of IC, and/or/but IC can apply, in this instance, we are referring to a nested construction "Did A and B, but did not do C". The subject is still the program as either usage indicates parallelism and subject can't change midway.
Requesting your inputs.
Thanks