The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experi

C has Tense problem, IMO
is it E?
parallel-ism and correct tense

due to parallelism BCE remains in 2/3 elimination process

E....
the sentences is in past but talks of something expected in future
_________________

OA Is
thanks guys

this is a classical case of future in past tense - 'would' construction perfect for such situations

E used 'would' correctly while maintaining parallel structure

Also E option has correct parallel structure Z that X & that Y,
other options lack above structure or have tense error.

The sentence is written in past tense telling about the future. E fulfills this criteria and is also parallel.

Federal rules....were established to ensure that patients would be warned of......and that an independent panel would.......

The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.
a. must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would
b. must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel
c. are warned about potential risks and than independent panel
d. will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would
e. would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would

C: E

Explanation of why E?

The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.
a. must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would
b. must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel
c. are warned about potential risks and than independent panel
d. will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would
e. would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would

C: E

Explanation of why E?
---------------------------------
step 1 : Lets make a possible distribution of answer choices.

Choice A & B use 'must'.
Choice C is different and unique of its kind.
Choice D & E use 'will/ would'

Sentence talks about the future while in past tense , so A, B & C are Ruled out.
Choice D is wrong as it is not parallel. ‘that’ is missing.
Choice ‘E’ is correct as it uses parallel structure and ‘ would’

The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

(A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would
(B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel
(C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel
(D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would
(E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would

C is wrong in tense. The non-underlined part is the past simple tense with "were established". So, the tense after that also agree in past. Only "would" and "must" are acceptable. Base on the meaning, "ensure" make sense to report the future tense rather than simple tense. In past, future tense will become hypothetical. "would" is okay

Note, never combine "present tense" with "hypothetical would" or "past tense" with "future will". This is rule.
_________________

There are multiple splits to eliminate answer choices.

"must" is redundant as we have the verb "ensure."

1. "established to ensure that P and Q" - P & Q should be parallel. Eliminate A, B, D.

"evaluate the experiment before it was conducted."
Would is used when a sentence talks about the future in past tense.
"Was" at the end of the sentence suggests that the sentence is speaking in past tense rather than the present.
Eliminate C.

E is correct.

There are often more prominent splits than idioms.
"Warned of" is more formal than "warned about"

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: the-federal-rules-aimed-at-protecting-human-subjects-of-medical-24300.html


_________________