Here are the official solutions:Q1. Which of the following is most likely the reason for the passage’s mention of Isaac Newton’s involvement in the South Sea Company?Correct Answer: (A)
Explanation:(A): Correct. The passage uses Newton as an example of an intelligent individual caught in the speculative frenzy, showing that even brilliant minds were not immune to poor financial decisions.(B): Incorrect. The passage does not suggest that scientists like Newton influenced financial development.
(C): Incorrect. Newton is mentioned for his financial losses, not for any financial expertise or wealth gained.
(D): Incorrect. The passage does not criticize Newton’s involvement in corrupt practices.
(E): Incorrect. There is no reference to the broader scientific community being affected by the South Sea Company’s collapse.
Q2. According to the passage, which of the following was NOT a contributing factor to London’s rise as a global financial center during the late 17th and early 18th centuries?Correct Answer: (D)
Explanation:(A): Incorrect. The passage explicitly mentions overseas investments from Amsterdam and France as key factors contributing to London’s financial growth.
(B): Incorrect. The creation of Bills of Exchange is highlighted as part of the foundational innovations that supported modern banking in London.
(C): Incorrect. The Treaty of Utrecht, which allowed Britain to supply slaves to Spanish America, is mentioned as a significant factor that contributed to an influx of capital, boosting London's financial position.
(D): Correct. While the South Sea Company is mentioned, its trading ventures are not described as a major factor in London's rise as a financial center. Instead, the company became infamous for speculative trading and financial collapse, not for contributing to London's financial growth.(E): Incorrect. The establishment of the Bank of England in 1694 is clearly identified as a crucial step in London’s development as a global financial hub.
Q3. Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage?Correct Answer: (B)
Explanation:(A): Incorrect. While the passage does describe some financial innovations chronologically, it does not analyze how the South Sea Company shaped modern financial systems. Instead, the passage focuses on the speculative bubble and the subsequent collapse.
(B): Correct. The passage begins with a discussion of London's financial development and then transitions into a detailed examination of the South Sea Company as a specific example of speculative excess, making this the most accurate description of the passage's organization.(C): Incorrect. Although the passage mentions the Nine Years' War in the context of the Bank of England's creation, it does not focus on the economic impact of the war or financial institutions restoring economic stability.
(D): Incorrect. The passage does not compare the South Sea Company to other joint-stock companies in detail. It focuses primarily on the South Sea Company's rise and collapse, without making direct comparisons to other companies.
(E): Incorrect. While international trade agreements like the Treaty of Utrecht are mentioned, the passage does not primarily explore Britain’s rise as a financial power through trade agreements. The focus is more on financial innovation and speculative bubbles.
Q4. Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument that the broader economic system endured in the long-term despite the collapse of the South Sea Company?Correct Answer: (D)
Explanation:(A): Incorrect. While this option suggests that financial practices continued after the collapse, it focuses on short-term endurance rather than long-term resilience. The development of new financial products does not necessarily indicate that the system became stronger over time.
(B): Incorrect. The recovery of individual investors doesn’t directly address the broader economic system’s endurance in the long term. This option focuses on personal financial recovery, which is separate from the system’s overall resilience.
(C): Incorrect. The survival of the South Sea Company itself does not directly relate to the broader economic system’s endurance. The focus of the argument is on the financial market as a whole, not the survival of a single company.
(D): Correct. The introduction of stricter financial regulations that made the market more resilient over time directly supports the idea that the broader economic system endured in the long term. This shows that the collapse led to reforms that strengthened the overall system, ensuring its survival and future stability.(E): Incorrect. The mention that foreign capital inflows never recovered contradicts the argument that the broader economic system endured in the long term. This option weakens, rather than strengthens, the argument.