Last visit was: 07 Sep 2026, 14:47 It is currently 07 Sep 2026, 14:47
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
yc168
Joined: 11 Nov 2024
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,132
Own Kudos:
1,127
 [3]
Given Kudos: 858
Products:
Posts: 1,132
Kudos: 1,127
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AdarshSambare
Joined: 29 Jan 2022
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 314
Own Kudos:
164
 [2]
Given Kudos: 137
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
GPA: 2
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Posts: 314
Kudos: 164
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,832
Own Kudos:
14,418
 [4]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,832
Kudos: 14,418
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BongBideshini
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 390
Own Kudos:
242
 [1]
Given Kudos: 137
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GPA: 3.8
WE:Engineering (Government)
Posts: 390
Kudos: 242
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Key facts:
  • The man lived at least 4,000 years ago.
  • He died where the body was found.
  • The body remained preserved only because:
    • it was sealed in the glacier shortly after death
    • and remained frozen continuously.
So the glacier must already have existed there 4,000 years ago.

A. None of the artifacts were more than 4,000 years old.
The passage says the artifacts reveal the man lived at least 4,000 years ago. Some artifacts could be older.

B. The man did not freeze to death.
Nothing discusses the cause of death.

C. The glacier that melted to reveal the body is at least 4,000 years old.
Strongly supported.
Since the body had to be sealed in the glacier shortly after death and remained frozen since then, the glacier must have existed for at least 4,000 years

D. The artifacts would not have been preserved without freezing.
The passage discusses preservation of the body, not necessarily the artifacts.

E. Global climate is warmer now than 4,000 years ago.
The glacier melting now does not prove an overall global climate comparison.

Answer: C

yc168
The frozen, well-preserved body of a man was recently discovered in a glacier as the glacier melted. Artifacts found on the body reveal that the man lived at least 4,000 years ago. The nature of the glacier indicates that the man died on virtually the same spot where his body was discovered. If the body had not been sealed in the glacier shortly after the man died, or if the body had thawed in the intervening millennia, it would not still be preserved.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported if all of the statements above are true?

(A) None of the artifacts found on the body were more than 4,000 years old.

(B) The man whose body was discovered in the glacier did not freeze to death.

(C) The glacier that melted to reveal the ancient body is at least 4,000 years old.

(D) The artifacts found on the frozen body would not have been preserved if they had not also been frozen.

(E) The global climate is, on average, warmer now than it was 4,000 years ago.
User avatar
vasu1104
Joined: 10 Feb 2023
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 733
Own Kudos:
422
 [1]
Given Kudos: 672
Location: Canada
Products:
Posts: 733
Kudos: 422
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
when glacier melted, well preserved body of man was discovered.
artifacts found on the body revealed that man lived at least 4000 years ago.
man died on the same spot where his body was discovered.
had body not been sealed shortly after the death or not been thawed, body wouldnt be still preserved.

A not this cant be true. if the artifacts helped to reveal that man lived at least for 4000 years ago then artifacts could be 4000 years old.
B out of scope. not concerned about how he died. reject.
C perfect. if the man is found to be at least 4000 years old and they found the body exactly the same place where he died, then glacier must be 4000 years old. keep.
D not concerned about artifacts being preserved or not. so reject.
E who cares. out.

yc168
The frozen, well-preserved body of a man was recently discovered in a glacier as the glacier melted. Artifacts found on the body reveal that the man lived at least 4,000 years ago. The nature of the glacier indicates that the man died on virtually the same spot where his body was discovered. If the body had not been sealed in the glacier shortly after the man died, or if the body had thawed in the intervening millennia, it would not still be preserved.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported if all of the statements above are true?

(A) None of the artifacts found on the body were more than 4,000 years old.

(B) The man whose body was discovered in the glacier did not freeze to death.

(C) The glacier that melted to reveal the ancient body is at least 4,000 years old.

(D) The artifacts found on the frozen body would not have been preserved if they had not also been frozen.

(E) The global climate is, on average, warmer now than it was 4,000 years ago.
User avatar
yc168
Joined: 11 Nov 2024
Last visit: 07 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,132
Own Kudos:
1,127
 [1]
Given Kudos: 858
Products:
Posts: 1,132
Kudos: 1,127
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OE for reference:

Overview:
In this passage you are given various pieces of information about the recent discovery in a glacier of an ancient, well-preserved body of a man. The passage simply makes a number of statements without drawing a conclusion from those statements.
To answer the question associated with this passage, you must decide which of the answer choices is most strongly supported by the information in the passage.

The Correct Answer:

C The passage tells us that the man's body was well preserved. It also tells us that the body wouldn't have been well preserved if it hadn't been sealed in the glacier shortly after the man died, or if it had thawed. So we can infer that the man's body was sealed in the glacier shortly after his death, that is, at least 4,000 years ago. We can also infer that this glacier has been continuously frozen for at least the past 4,000 years. Thus, (C) is very strongly supported by the information in the passage.

The Incorrect Answer Choices:

A The passage tells us that the artifacts found on the body show that the man lived at least 4,000 years ago. That means that none of those artifacts could have been less than 4,000 years old, since the body, along with its artifacts, had been sealed up, undisturbed from the time the man died. So the artifacts could well be somewhat more than 4,000 years old. Therefore, (A) is not supported by the information in the passage.

B Nothing in the passage tells us anything about how the man died. All we know is that he was on or very near a glacier when he died. So he might have frozen to death, or he might have died from other causes. So (B) is not supported by any information provided in the passage.

D The passage tells us that the body would not still be preserved if it had not been frozen. However, the only thing we know about the artifacts found with the body is that they are probably at least 4,000 years old. The passage tells us nothing that would indicate what those artifacts were made of. Some artifacts, like those made of animal skins, may need to be frozen in order to be preserved. Other artifacts, like those made of stone or metal, might well have been preserved even if they had not been frozen. So, although (D) might be true, the passage does not support it.

E The passage gives us good reason to believe that the climate at the location of the glacier is warmer now than it was 4,000 years ago. But there is no reason to think that changes in temperature at a single spot on the globe are good indicators of changes in the global climate as a whole. So (E) is not supported by the information in the passage.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts