The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy—the clogging of the streets of the central business district alone cost the economy more than $1.2 billion over the past year. In order to address this problem, officials plan to introduce congestion pricing, by which drivers would pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of the day. Which of the following, if true, would most strongly indicate that the plan will be a success? (A) Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other . (B) Planners expect that, without congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is likely to grow by 6 percent in the next five years . (C) In other urban areas, congestion pricing has strongly encouraged carpooling (sharing of rides by private commuters). (D) Several studies have shown that a reduction in traffic of 15 percent in Masana could result in 5,500 or more new jobs. (E) Over 30 percent of the vehicles in the city's center are occupied by more than one person Evaluation of a Plan Situation Traffic congestion in Masana has been harming the city's economy. To address the problem, officials plan to make drivers pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of day. Reasoning What would most strongly suggest that the plan will reduce the harm to Masana's economy from traffic congestion? In order to succeed, the plan will have to be implemented and effectively enforced. Furthermore, the prices drivers pay will have to be high enough to significantly change their behavior in ways that reduce the amount of traffic congestion in the city. Finally, the economic benefits from the reduced traffic congestion will have to substantially outweigh any economically damaging side effects of the congestion pricing. Any evidence that any of these conditions will hold would provide at least some support for the prediction that the plan will succeed. (A) This provides no evidence that the congestion pricing would affect the behavior of either the one-fifth of drivers whose vehicles traverse the city or of the other four-fifths of drivers, nor does it give any evidence that the plan would produce overriding economic benefits. (B) This indicates that the traffic problem will grow worse if the plan is not implemented, but it does not provide any evidence that the plan will help address the problem. (C) Correct . This indicates that similar plans have successfully changed drivers' behavior in other cities in a way likely to reduce the number of cars on the road in heavily trafficked areas at busy times of day without producing harmful economic side effects. Thus, it provides evidence that the strategy could also be successful in Masana. (D) Although this suggests that reducing traffic congestion would be economically beneficial, it doesn't provide any evidence that the plan will succeed in reducing traffic congestion. (E) This suggests that many drivers in the city center are already carpooling, which, if anything, indicates that the plan will be less able to further affect those drivers' behavior and thus could be less effective than it might otherwise be. Masana's Traffic Step 1: Identify the Question The question asks for the answer that would indicate that the plan will be a success, so this is a Strengthen the Argument question. Step 2: Deconstruct the Argument Traffic hurts econ →cost =1.2B Plan: congestion pricing Step 3: Pause and State the Goal On Strengthen questions, the goal is to find an answer that makes the conclusion more likely. In this problem, look for a reason that congestion pricing will be more likely to address the traffic congestion and associated economic issues in Masana. Step 4: Work from Wrong to Right (A) Based on this answer 20% of drivers are going across the city, and 80% are driving for other purposes. There is no clear relationship between this information and the effectiveness of congestion pricing (i.e. are drivers traversing the city more or less likely to not drive if congestion pricing is implemented?). (B) The argument establishes that traffic is already a problem. This answer suggests that this problem is likely to get worse in the next five years, but this information does not help evaluate whether congestion pricing will help . (C) CORRECT . This answer states that congestion pricing was effective in reducing traffic in other cities because commuters carpooled, reducing the number of cars on the road. Knowing that a plan worked in a similar situation supports the idea that the plan might have its intended effect in Masana. (D) This answers links the traffic issues to economic issues, stating that there is information that a reduction in traffic could benefit the economy through the creation of jobs. It does not, however, address whether the specific plan of implementing congestion pricing would result in reduced traffic . (E) If anything, this answer weakens the argument because it suggests that additional carpooling (encouraging carpooling is one way that congestion pricing might reduce traffic) may not be feasible in Masana because many cars already contain multiple passengers.

Last visit was: 07 Sep 2026, 04:40

It is currently 07 Sep 2026, 04:40

Toolkit

Critical Reasoning (CR)

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Sep 07
The Free 12-Week GMAT Study Plan (Full Walkthrough)
10:00 AM PDT
-
11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost.
Sep 02
Save on All Magoosh Study Plans
01:00 PM EDT
-
11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 04
Make Your Hard Work Count: Up to $300 OFF 1-on-1 Tutoring
01:30 AM EDT
-
02:30 AM EDT
This Labor Day, turn your hard work into real score gains. From 615→715 in 15 days to 705 in 30 days, our students prove what's possible with personalized, expert guidance. Save up to 25% on 1-on-1 tutoring.
Sep 04
BIG NEWS! We’ve been nominated, and we’d love your vote!
10:00 AM EDT
-
11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 07
All GMAT Club Tests are free and open for Labor Day on Monday, September 7th!
12:01 AM PDT
-
11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT
Sep 07
Stuck at 645 After 3 Attempts: The Problem Wasn't Effort
12:30 AM EDT
-
01:30 AM EDT
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.
Sep 09
Masters' Spotlight Fair
07:00 AM PDT
-
10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway
Sep 09
How Aman Bounced Back from 3 MBA Rejections to Get Into Cambridge
10:00 AM PDT
-
11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application...
Sep 10
Start your free trial!
08:00 PM PDT
-
09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Sep 15
Live Online Class with Top GMAT Expert Rich Zwelling
07:00 PM EDT
-
09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 21
Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover
08:00 PM EDT
-
10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST

Back to Forum

Create Topic

The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy

1 2 3 4

mollyweasley

Joined: 15 Oct 2020

Last visit: 27 Apr 2026

Posts: 28

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 8

Posts: 28

Kudos: 35

13 Jul 2024, 10:52

Kudos

Bookmarks

GMATNinja ChiranjeevSingh please correct where i'm wrong - the objective is to reduce the negative impact of traffic on the economy, correct? not just to reduce traffic congestion?
so if folks are travelling through the CBD and paying the congestion fee (somewhat option A), doesn't that reduce the burden on the economy, irrespective of whether it reduces traffic or not?

DmitryFarberMPrep

Manhattan Prep Instructor

Joined: 22 Mar 2011

Last visit: 31 Aug 2026

Posts: 3,004

Own Kudos:

8,670

[2]

Given Kudos: 57

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85 Verified score

Posts: 3,004

Kudos: 8,670

[2]

14 Jul 2024, 01:22

Kudos

Bookmarks

mollyweasley

Two things here:
1) Yes, the objective is to help the economy, but the argument is still specifically about reducing the negative impact of traffic on the economy. So an answer that simply says money will be made, without a clear indication of traffic reduction, cannot be a strengthener. We have to see the argument working as proposed.
2) We don't care *where* the cars are coming from, just whether the fee will reduce traffic. Whether the cars are going across town, or parking in the congested area, or just circling for fun, the streets are crowing regardless. (A) doesn't tell us anything to indicate whether traffic will be reduced by the measure, so it can't be a strengthener. And if we were just looking for additional revenue, it wouldn't tell us anything about that, either. We already know the streets are crowded with cars, so there is revenue to be had. Knowing that the cars are going across town doesn't make it any clearer that the revenue will be substantial.

Inesgcruz

Joined: 04 Jul 2024

Last visit: 24 Jul 2024

Posts: 1

Kudos: 0

16 Jul 2024, 12:12

Kudos

Bookmarks

Hi,
When resolving this question I had trouble identifying the true goal of the plan. Is the problem the high traffic or how much this affects the city's economy?
Although I have now seen on the comments that the answer would be the first option, I still don't get how one could know that for sure based on the question alone.
I ended up choosing D as this option would reduce the economic impact that traffic represents.

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

Joined: 13 Aug 2009

Last visit: 03 Sep 2026

Posts: 7,399

Own Kudos:

71,578

[1]

Given Kudos: 2,182

Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors

Location: United States (CO)

GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 Verified score

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Posts: 7,399

Kudos: 71,578

[1]

30 Jul 2024, 10:02

Kudos

Bookmarks

Inesgcruz

Hi,

When solving this question I had trouble identifying the true goal of the plan. Is the problem the high traffic or how much this affects the city's economy?

Although I have now seen on the comments that the answer would be the first option, I still don't get how one could know that for sure based on the question alone.

I ended up choosing D as this option would reduce the economic impact that traffic represents.

Is the goal of the plan to reduce traffic or to help the economy? Well, it's both: the officials want to help the economy BY reducing traffic.

You're partially right about (D): yes, IF we can add 5,500 jobs, that certainly would help the city's economy and thus make the officials happy.

But that's only IF we can add those jobs. If the officials' plan FAILS to reduce traffic, then (D) doesn't do the economy or the officials any good.

In other words, (D) doesn't give us any reason to believe that the officials' PLAN will actually reduce traffic, which means that (D) doesn't give us any reason to believe that the plan will actually help the economy.

I hope that helps!

GulfTube

Joined: 13 Apr 2026

Last visit: 17 Aug 2026

Posts: 210

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 77

Posts: 210

Kudos: 70

26 Jun 2026, 02:24

Kudos

Bookmarks

Goal: reduce drain on the city's economy caused by traffic clogging.
Plan: introduce congestion pricing, by which drivers would pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of the day.

Question: strengthen the idea that plan will achieve it's goal. This is important, we are not looking for answers that indicate potential reasons to implement this plan, we are rather looking for something that supports the idea that this specific plan will be successful in achieving this specific goal.

(A) Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other.
This gives a good reason that the plan will achieve it's goal of reducing traffic clogging since if one-fifth of cars are those that enter the business district then the fee may be a deterrent for them and make them avoid the area thereby reducing traffic congestion. There are couple of flaws with this thinking, first assuming that those travelers will not simply pay the fee and still enter the trafficked areas with their vehicles is incorrect to do. Secondly, this option only talks about the central business district area. The question stem states most heavily trafficked areas and merely used central business district area as an example to put the point across. Our focus is to reduce traffic congestion overall in heavy-clogged areas in general.

(B) Planners expect that, without congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is likely to grow by 6 percent in the next five years.
This is merely a good reason to implement congestion pricing, tells us nothing about whether it will lead to successfully achieving the goal of traffic congestion reduction or not.

(C) In other urban areas, congestion pricing has strongly encouraged carpooling (sharing of rides by private commuters).
Unlike option A, carpooling does reduce the number of vehicles on the road which leads to lowering the traffic congestion. Also, this mentions carpooling has been led on as a result of congestion pricing which shows clear relationship between the plan and goal that the question stem refers. Moreover, by stating urban areas we can be confident in drawing parallels with Masana which is stated to be a city with business district indicating it is a major urban area itself.

(D) Several studies have shown that a reduction in traffic of 15 percent in Masana could result in 5,500 or more new jobs.
States a benefit of achieving the goal of traffic congestion reduction. Does not talk about the plan at all. Irrelevant to the matter.

(E) Over 30 percent of the vehicles in the city's center are occupied by more than one person
Occupancy of vehicles has nothing to do with traffic congestion which is about the number of vehicles out there at a point in time. Irrelevant to the matter.