GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 18 Jul 2018, 11:43

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Posts: 138
Location: Italy
Schools: EDHEC (A)
GMAT 1: 650 Q43 V37
GPA: 3.2
WE: General Management (Human Resources)
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2017, 14:20
mihir0710 wrote:
Got it may b A is correct

My reasoning : a probable weakener for the argument can be that what if all the people that are going by that central route have central area as their final destination and hence even if you charge them they have no option but to pay and still go that route ..
In this case the plan fails

So fill this loophole a supporting argument can be : since 1/5 are traveling to the other side of the city they do not actually want to go to central area but they are just using that route..
So, there is a scope that these people can take another route ..
So if they are forced to pay they may take the other route and thus reduce congestion..

Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum

I also voted for A using the same reasoning!
The fact that in other urban areas passing a similar law has encouraged carpooling doesn't mean that this would be a success also in this city!
Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2017
Posts: 93
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V34
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2017, 03:12

For those who are asking why not A, i think this should help-

Even if government put congestion pricing, we dont know will the 20% divert their route or not. why?

-because we dont know- is there any other route for these 20%. We cannot expect that these 20% people will stop going to there respective destination. ( They will have to live with this fact and pay the congestion pricing)

-Even if there is a route, we dont know will it be viable option for the 20% population- Maybe it is too long a route which will cost equally high and maybe take double the time to travel.
And seeing the popularity of this route- ^^These assumption may not be an assumption but actual truth.

-Also, though option C also has a inherent assumption that public transport is not being used currently. But option A has much bigger problem.
Intern
Joined: 21 Jan 2017
Posts: 26
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2017, 17:46
stne wrote:
Skywalker18 wrote:
The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy - the clogging of the streets of the central business district alone cost the economy more than \$1.2 billion over the past year. In order to address this problem, officials plan to introduce congestion pricing, by which drivers would pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of the day.

Which of the following, if true, would most strongly indicate that the plan will be a success?
A. Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other .
B.Planners expect that, without congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is likely to grow by 6 percent in the next five years .
C.In other urban areas, congestion pricing has strongly encouraged carpooling (sharing of rides by private commuters).
D.Several studies have shown that a reduction in traffic of 15 percent in Masana could result in 5,500 or more new jobs.
E.Over 30 percent of the vehicles in the city's center are occupied by more than one person

Just a view on option C :
if something has worked in city x does that necessarily mean that the same thing will work in city y too?
The demographics of both the cities may be entirely different.
Other urban city people may feel the pinch of congestion pricing, this urban city people may not feel so.
This particular urban city may have offices spread far apart that car pooling may not be possible even if people wanted to.
This particular urban city may have smaller sized cars that despite car pooling congestion may not reduce much.
There could be a host of other factors that may NOT give the same result as that achieved in other urban city.
An example :
Daytime mandatory head lamps being on, could reduce collision in city x due to high smog there,which reduces visibility, but the same effect should not be expected in city Y which has no smog and has excellent visibility.

Please correct me so that I can improve the logical flaws in my thought process.
I still feel B should have been the answer.
Is this really from OG 2018?

Exactly!! we generally tend to ignore the options with wrong/irrelevant comparison. I still doubt how can C be the correct option? IMO B.

Thanks,
Uma
Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2016
Posts: 25
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2017, 03:21
gmatexam439 wrote:
The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy - the clogging of the streets of the central business district alone cost the economy more than \$1.2 billion over the past year. In order to address this problem, officials plan to introduce congestion pricing, by which drivers would pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of the day.

Which of the following, if true, would most strongly indicate that the plan will be a success?

A. Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other . - We are least bothered aboout how many vehicles are in transit

B.Planners expect that, without congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is likely to grow by 6 percent in the next five years . - The argument is about economy drain and not about traffic

C.In other urban areas, congestion pricing has strongly encouraged carpooling (sharing of rides by private commuters). - Looks good. Car pooling will help reduce the number of vehicles on road, thereby strengthening the argument.

D.Several studies have shown that a reduction in traffic of 15 percent in Masana could result in 5,500 or more new jobs. - The argument is about how congestion pricing might help improve the economy. This option tells us that the reduction in traffic will help - the argument also says so - but it doesn't tell us how congestion pricing will help the economy.

E.Over 30 percent of the vehicles in the city's center are occupied by more than one person - We are least interested in the number of people occupying the vehicles

Hi gmatexam439,

I agree with the reasoning that you have given for point B, stating that its about economy, not about traffic.
But in point C also, there is no mention/ relation to economy, it talks about car-pooling.

Its our own reasoning that more car pooling will decrease traffic and hence better the economy.
Similarly, why cant we deduce the same for point B, that if traffic increases by even 1% of what it is already... it will certainly affect the economy more than the current situation.
Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2016
Posts: 38
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q47 V21
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
WE: Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2017, 07:24
ChiranjeevSingh

Please validate the reasoning for A & B

A:- Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other :- Which route and at what time, nothing is mentioned as argument vouches for "congestion pricing (CP)" during selective timing at selective route

B:- Planners expect that, without congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is likely to grow by 6 percent in the next five years :- Current rate is not known, After CP , traffic rate is not known. It is possible that 6% is lower than current rate say 10%. In that case, even without CP purpose is getting solved.
_________________

Consider giving Kudos, if you find worth it !!

Manager
Status: Private GMAT Tutor
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Posts: 84
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: IIMA (A)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2017, 23:20
2
AbhiGarg2007 wrote:
ChiranjeevSingh

Please validate the reasoning for A & B

A:- Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other :- Which route and at what time, nothing is mentioned as argument vouches for "congestion pricing (CP)" during selective timing at selective route

B:- Planners expect that, without congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is likely to grow by 6 percent in the next five years :- Current rate is not known, After CP , traffic rate is not known. It is possible that 6% is lower than current rate say 10%. In that case, even without CP purpose is getting solved.

I've now written a detailed solution for it

http://gmatwithcj.com/solutions/critica ... s-economy/
_________________
VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1206
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2017, 06:49
Skywalker18 wrote:
The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy - the clogging of the streets of the central business district alone cost the economy more than \$1.2 billion over the past year. In order to address this problem, officials plan to introduce congestion pricing, by which drivers would pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of the day.

Which of the following, if true, would most strongly indicate that the plan will be a success?

(A) Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other .

(B) Planners expect that, without congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is likely to grow by 6 percent in the next five years .

(C) In other urban areas, congestion pricing has strongly encouraged carpooling (sharing of rides by private commuters).

(D) Several studies have shown that a reduction in traffic of 15 percent in Masana could result in 5,500 or more new jobs.

(E) Over 30 percent of the vehicles in the city's center are occupied by more than one person

Premise 1:The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy - the clogging of the streets of the central business district alone cost the economy more than \$1.2 billion over the past year

Plan :In order to address this problem, officials plan to introduce congestion pricing, by which drivers would pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of the day

A is does not tell us any ting about the plan's success .If 1/5 of the vehicles are in transit we do not know whether they would not come in peak times or they would .
There can be only one way to go and that is heavily congested so i think it is not going to decrease congestion.

B is irrelevant

C this options tells us that this strategy has forced many private commuters to carpooling and thus reduce congestion , thus the plan would would work.
D Again this is irrelevant

E This also does not affect the argument and has no bearing on the plan.
_________________

Intern
Joined: 24 Jan 2017
Posts: 10
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2017, 12:11
GMATNinja wrote:
Nightmare007 wrote:
Hi daagh,
I am not satisfied with the explanations above for taking C to be better than A.
If A needs an assumption that Most of vehicles from these 20% outside vehicles will take alternate road because of the new rule.
So does C, C needs assumption that what worked in other city will work in the Manasa.
Sir, Can you please throw some light in this question.
Thank you.

Quote:
The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy - the clogging of the streets of the central business district alone cost the economy more than \$1.2 billion over the past year. In order to address this problem, officials plan to introduce congestion pricing, by which drivers would pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of the day.

Which of the following, if true, would most strongly indicate that the plan will be a success?
A. Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other .
B.Planners expect that, without congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is likely to grow by 6 percent in the next five years .
C.In other urban areas, congestion pricing has strongly encouraged carpooling (sharing of rides by private commuters).
D.Several studies have shown that a reduction in traffic of 15 percent in Masana could result in 5,500 or more new jobs.
E.Over 30 percent of the vehicles in the city's center are occupied by more than one person

The question asks, "Which of the following would most strongly indicate that the plan will be a success?". We don't need an answer that proves with 100% certainty that what worked in other cities will work in Manasa. If the plan worked in other urban areas, this is strong evidence that the plan will work in Masana, and that's all we need.

Choice A, on the other hand, gives us no indication of whether the plan will succeed. The ratio of the number of vehicles traveling across the city to the number of vehicles just travelling into the central business district and back out (without crossing the city) makes no difference. We need evidence that the congestion pricing will reduce the clogging of the streets in the central business district, and the background information given in choice (A) does not provide evidence either way.

I hope this helps!

Why A is wrong? If the 20% of f the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other, taxing the drivers who enter the city's trafficked area could help reduce traffic in the district center

Why C is right? Even if congestion pricing helped to reduce traffic in other urban areas, NOT necessarily the strategy will work in Masana

I notice that in some CR questions some alternatives present some analogies, for example, if taxing companies reduced air pollution in the Boston area, the same will work in NY area- the one presented in the argument - such as the analogy in question (589). If taxing OTHER urban areas reduced traffic, so taxing the central district area will reduce traffic as well, and therefore the answer choice is correct. In the other hand, sometimes, the analogy is irrelevant, so the answer choice is wrong. So, how will I know that the answer choice using this kind of comparison will be right or wrong? The only thing I can think of is using process of elimination. Does that make sense?!

Many tks!
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1825
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2017, 15:42
1
GuilhermeAzevedo wrote:
Why A is wrong? If the 20% of f the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other, taxing the drivers who enter the city's trafficked area could help reduce traffic in the district center

Why C is right? Even if congestion pricing helped to reduce traffic in other urban areas, NOT necessarily the strategy will work in Masana

I notice that in some CR questions some alternatives present some analogies, for example, if taxing companies reduced air pollution in the Boston area, the same will work in NY area- the one presented in the argument - such as the analogy in question (589). If taxing OTHER urban areas reduced traffic, so taxing the central district area will reduce traffic as well, and therefore the answer choice is correct. In the other hand, sometimes, the analogy is irrelevant, so the answer choice is wrong. So, how will I know that the answer choice using this kind of comparison will be right or wrong? The only thing I can think of is using process of elimination. Does that make sense?!

Many tks!

The plan is to make drivers pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of the day. We need to select the answer that most strongly suggests that the plan will reduce the traffic congestion.

Quote:
A. Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other .

Choice (A) tells us that one-fifth of the vehicles are in transit from one side of the city to the other, so, yes, congestion pricing might encourage those drivers to take an alternate route. But congestion pricing could also have NO effect on those drivers, who might prefer to pay a fee rather than drive all the way around the city. Choice (A) does not present any evidence indicating how those drivers will react, if at all, to the congestion pricing. And what about the other four-fifths of the vehicles? Will their drivers be affected by the congestion pricing?

The biggest problem with (A) is that it does not present any evidence to suggest HOW the drivers will react to the congestion pricing.

Quote:
C.In other urban areas, congestion pricing has strongly encouraged carpooling (sharing of rides by private commuters).

True, just because it worked somewhere else does NOT NECESSARILY mean it will work in Masana. But we are not asked to PROVE that the plan will work. We only need something that STRONGLY INDICATES that the plan will be a success.

Choice (C) provides evidence regarding HOW other drivers reacted to congestion pricing, exactly the kind of evidence that was lacking in choice (A). Thus, we now have EVIDENCE that the plan could have a similar on drivers in Masana. Sure, this doesn't prove anything, but it is better than (A) and the other options.

Whether the analogous situation is relevant will depend on what they are asking. Regardless, process of elimination is definitely your best friend!

I hope that helps!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

Moderator
Joined: 22 Jun 2014
Posts: 1053
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 540 Q45 V20
GPA: 2.49
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Oct 2017, 10:36
GMATNinja wrote:
If the plan worked in other urban areas, this is strong evidence that the plan will work in Masana, and that's all we need.

Hi GMATNinja,

Case-1: In few CR questions we see a choice like "C" is wrong for the reason that WHAT IS TRUE FOR OTHER CITY MIGHT NOT BE TRUE FOR THIS CITY.

Case-2: In other CR question a choice like "C" is correct for the reason that WHAT IS TRUE FOR OTHER CITY could be TRUE FOR THIS CITY.

Case-2 is applicable in this question in choice C, as you also noted as the reasoning above.

This distinction has been a problem for me since long and i have not found the right reasoning and solution for it.

I really need your help in understanding when the comparison for a situation happened/handled in one area/city with OTHER is considered correct/incorrect.

Thanks.
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------
Target - 720-740
http://gmatclub.com/forum/information-on-new-gmat-esr-report-beta-221111.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/list-of-one-year-full-time-mba-programs-222103.html

Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2015
Posts: 1
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Oct 2017, 22:41
Hi, Why not D? If there are 5500 more jobs by the reduction in traffic then clearly this strengthens the argument?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1825
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2017, 21:18
wycombe06 wrote:
Hi, Why not D? If there are 5500 more jobs by the reduction in traffic then clearly this strengthens the argument?

Quote:
(D) Several studies have shown that a reduction in traffic of 15 percent in Masana could result in 5,500 or more new jobs.

The plan is to make drivers pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of the day. We need to select the answer that most strongly suggests that the plan will reduce the traffic congestion.

Choice (D) tells us that IF traffic is reduced by 15%, then 5,500 new jobs could be created. It does not tell us whether the plan will actually succeed in reducing traffic, so it does not help answer the question.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1825
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2017, 21:33
Quote:
Hi GMATNinja,

Case-1: In few CR questions we see a choice like "C" is wrong for the reason that WHAT IS TRUE FOR OTHER CITY MIGHT NOT BE TRUE FOR THIS CITY.

Case-2: In other CR question a choice like "C" is correct for the reason that WHAT IS TRUE FOR OTHER CITY could be TRUE FOR THIS CITY.

Case-2 is applicable in this question in choice C, as you also noted as the reasoning above.

This distinction has been a problem for me since long and i have not found the right reasoning and solution for it.

I really need your help in understanding when the comparison for a situation happened/handled in one area/city with OTHER is considered correct/incorrect.

Thanks.

HKD1710, I understand your concern, but unfortunately there is not clear cut formula that will tell you when a comparison is valid and when it is not. It all depends on what is being asked and what the other choices are. If it works in one city, that can probably be used as evidence to support that it will work in another comparable city, but it certainly doesn't prove anything. But if you are only looking for a strengthener, such a comparison might be the best option.

However, imagine a passage with the following logic: "A similar plan worked in City A. Therefore, the plan will work in City B." Clearly this logic is flawed because, even if the cities are similar, we cannot know for sure whether the plan will work in City B.

My advice is to review the other questions you have in mind and focus on what makes the other choices incorrect. For reference, here is the portion of my last post related to your concern:

Quote:
True, just because it worked somewhere else does NOT NECESSARILY mean it will work in Masana. But we are not asked to PROVE that the plan will work. We only need something that STRONGLY INDICATES that the plan will be a success.

Choice (C) provides evidence regarding HOW other drivers reacted to congestion pricing, exactly the kind of evidence that was lacking in choice (A). Thus, we now have EVIDENCE that the plan could have a similar on drivers in Masana. Sure, this doesn't prove anything, but it is better than (A) and the other options.

Whether the analogous situation is relevant will depend on what they are asking. Regardless, process of elimination is definitely your best friend!

I know that isn't a very satisfying response, but I hope it helps!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

Intern
Joined: 04 Dec 2016
Posts: 29
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Oct 2017, 00:40
HKD1710 wrote:
GMATNinja wrote:
If the plan worked in other urban areas, this is strong evidence that the plan will work in Masana, and that's all we need.

Hi GMATNinja,

Case-1: In few CR questions we see a choice like "C" is wrong for the reason that WHAT IS TRUE FOR OTHER CITY MIGHT NOT BE TRUE FOR THIS CITY.

Case-2: In other CR question a choice like "C" is correct for the reason that WHAT IS TRUE FOR OTHER CITY could be TRUE FOR THIS CITY.

Case-2 is applicable in this question in choice C, as you also noted as the reasoning above.

This distinction has been a problem for me since long and i have not found the right reasoning and solution for it.

I really need your help in understanding when the comparison for a situation happened/handled in one area/city with OTHER is considered correct/incorrect.

Thanks.

Hi HKD1710
This is a genuine concern that always haunted me. But after reading on various forums and explanations given by Ron, I realized that we face this issue because we start to generalize CR and start to assign rule to the option types.
As a result we shut off the process of normal Real World Thinking in this approach...

So let me analyze this issue with you here...
For a second Pls forget that u knew THE ABOVE STATED RULE PROBLEM... and you were talking to me about the argument...

You: Bro, in our city there is huge issue of traffic and congestion.
Me: Yeah really...have u seen the jam packed streets of the MAIN BUSINESS street....you cant even move your car even inches for hours

You: This is hampering the economy seriuosly
ME: No worries... a new congestion pricing has been applied...and drivers will have to pay the price if they entered those main area heavy traffic streets.

MAIN ISSUE: Will this congestion price reduce the traffic problem? Yes for strengthen/ No for Weaken

ME: So what, I will have to take my car out if I go to office and I will pay....Weaken...as it will not reduce traffice
You: I will go with you as my office is near to yours...Strengthen as this reduce the traffic

Now you just need to look for answer where there is such a relation in Congestion pricing and traffic

(A) Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other .
just an info...no relation shown between congestion pricing and traffic...IRRELEVANT

(B) Planners expect that, without congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is likely to grow by 6 percent in the next five years .
Does this give any info whether the present congestion pricing in effect, would reduce/ keep same the traffic level?...
There is a very broad assumption lying behind this statement that planners thinks congestion pricing is a solution...but what would actually happen WITH congestion pricing on traffic is not hinted...

It is like saying:
If I don't study O.G., I wont score Good marks : Does this mean that I would score good score marks if I studied from O.G. => maybe/may be not...not surely indicated...
IRRELEVANT

(C) In other urban areas, congestion pricing has strongly encouraged carpooling (sharing of rides by private commuters).
Congestion pricing has strongly encouraged car pooling ...means reduced traffic...HERE you SEE a relation between the two and DIRECTLY addresses the issue...You can safely align your thought that since such a relation is seen somewhere, you can also expect those...
The answer need not be MUST BE TRUE...you just need a directional response to your main issue.

(D) Several studies have shown that a reduction in traffic of 15 percent in Masana could result in 5,500 or more new jobs.
Again No relation between Congestion pricing and Traffic...IRRELEVANT

(E) Over 30 percent of the vehicles in the city's center are occupied by more than one person
so what?? no link towards the main issue...IRRELEVANT

Hope this helps

Regards
Shoum
Manager
Joined: 30 Apr 2017
Posts: 72
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Oct 2017, 05:58
GMATNinja wrote:
GuilhermeAzevedo wrote:
Why A is wrong? If the 20% of f the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other, taxing the drivers who enter the city's trafficked area could help reduce traffic in the district center

Why C is right? Even if congestion pricing helped to reduce traffic in other urban areas, NOT necessarily the strategy will work in Masana

I notice that in some CR questions some alternatives present some analogies, for example, if taxing companies reduced air pollution in the Boston area, the same will work in NY area- the one presented in the argument - such as the analogy in question (589). If taxing OTHER urban areas reduced traffic, so taxing the central district area will reduce traffic as well, and therefore the answer choice is correct. In the other hand, sometimes, the analogy is irrelevant, so the answer choice is wrong. So, how will I know that the answer choice using this kind of comparison will be right or wrong? The only thing I can think of is using process of elimination. Does that make sense?!

Many tks!

The plan is to make drivers pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of the day. We need to select the answer that most strongly suggests that the plan will reduce the traffic congestion.

Quote:
A. Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other .

Choice (A) tells us that one-fifth of the vehicles are in transit from one side of the city to the other, so, yes, congestion pricing might encourage those drivers to take an alternate route. But congestion pricing could also have NO effect on those drivers, who might prefer to pay a fee rather than drive all the way around the city. Choice (A) does not present any evidence indicating how those drivers will react, if at all, to the congestion pricing. And what about the other four-fifths of the vehicles? Will their drivers be affected by the congestion pricing?

The biggest problem with (A) is that it does not present any evidence to suggest HOW the drivers will react to the congestion pricing.

Quote:
C.In other urban areas, congestion pricing has strongly encouraged carpooling (sharing of rides by private commuters).

True, just because it worked somewhere else does NOT NECESSARILY mean it will work in Masana. But we are not asked to PROVE that the plan will work. We only need something that STRONGLY INDICATES that the plan will be a success.

Choice (C) provides evidence regarding HOW other drivers reacted to congestion pricing, exactly the kind of evidence that was lacking in choice (A). Thus, we now have EVIDENCE that the plan could have a similar on drivers in Masana. Sure, this doesn't prove anything, but it is better than (A) and the other options.

Whether the analogous situation is relevant will depend on what they are asking. Regardless, process of elimination is definitely your best friend!

I hope that helps!

Hi GMATNinja

I can vividly remember alot of examples in which we had the same situation and the official answer said : who cares!? who cares what happen in the other nation/city/country... in the same condition. we cannot infer it wil have the same effect on our case..

now I'm really confused... whn should I care.. when shouldn't
Intern
Joined: 04 Dec 2016
Posts: 29
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Oct 2017, 21:27
2
soodia wrote:

I can vividly remember alot of examples in which we had the same situation and the official answer said : who cares!? who cares what happen in the other nation/city/country... in the same condition. we cannot infer it wil have the same effect on our case..

now I'm really confused... whn should I care.. when shouldn't

Hi
If I may try to answer...
In strengthen/weaken you need to find a directional approach that directly deals with the main issue of the problem...U dont need to be 100% sure whether the same effect will be observed...

Regards
S
CEO
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 2633
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2017, 10:55
1
Top Contributor
Skywalker18 wrote:
The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy - the clogging of the streets of the central business district alone cost the economy more than \$1.2 billion over the past year. In order to address this problem, officials plan to introduce congestion pricing, by which drivers would pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of the day.

Which of the following, if true, would most strongly indicate that the plan will be a success?

(A) Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other .

(B) Planners expect that, without congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is likely to grow by 6 percent in the next five years .

(C) In other urban areas, congestion pricing has strongly encouraged carpooling (sharing of rides by private commuters).

(D) Several studies have shown that a reduction in traffic of 15 percent in Masana could result in 5,500 or more new jobs.

(E) Over 30 percent of the vehicles in the city's center are occupied by more than one person

PREMISE: Heavy traffic bad for economy
PREMISE: Traffic = \$1.2B hit to economy
IMPLIED CONCLUSION: Congestion pricing will reduce traffic

Answer choice C says that the strategy has worked in other cities. That is, congestion pricing HAS reduced traffic. Does this mean that the strategy will DEFINITELY work in Masana? No. However, we must keep in mind that our goal here is not to strengthen the argument so that it is 100% guaranteed; our goal is to simply strengthen the argument (ever so slightly)

Cheers,
Brent
_________________

Brent Hanneson – Founder of gmatprepnow.com

Intern
Joined: 17 Jul 2017
Posts: 22
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2017, 11:40
Skywalker18 wrote:
The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy - the clogging of the streets of the central business district alone cost the economy more than \$1.2 billion over the past year. In order to address this problem, officials plan to introduce congestion pricing, by which drivers would pay to enter the city's most heavily trafficked areas during the busiest times of the day.

Which of the following, if true, would most strongly indicate that the plan will be a success?

(A) Approximately one-fifth of the vehicles in the central business district are in transit from one side of the city to the other .

(B) Planners expect that, without congestion pricing, traffic in Masana is likely to grow by 6 percent in the next five years .

(C) In other urban areas, congestion pricing has strongly encouraged carpooling (sharing of rides by private commuters).

(D) Several studies have shown that a reduction in traffic of 15 percent in Masana could result in 5,500 or more new jobs.

(E) Over 30 percent of the vehicles in the city's center are occupied by more than one person

Argument: The traffic congestion has adverse effect on City's economy, So to get back the money, Officials wants to introduce Congestion pricing,

Here Traffic congestion is the root cause, To help with the economy, Our main concern is to find a evidence which will strengthen ways in which Traffic congestion will be decreased.

A. I think A is irrerevalent or we don't have enough information and this will no way reduce traffic congestion.
B. Main aim is to decrease the congestion, It will grow or not is not the concern.
C. If People start car poolig like in other urban cities, it will help in decreasing traffic. - Correct
D. Irrelevant.
E. It doesn't matter, Congestion is caused by vehicle, Not by number of person in it.
Re: The heavy traffic in Masana is a growing drain on the city's economy   [#permalink] 30 Nov 2017, 11:40

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 38 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.