Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 02:41 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 02:41
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
globaldesi
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Last visit: 03 Jun 2025
Posts: 1,157
Own Kudos:
1,941
 [9]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '18 (D)
GPA: 3.97
WE:Project Management (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
Schools: ISB '18 (D)
Posts: 1,157
Kudos: 1,941
 [9]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jrk23
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Last visit: 29 Oct 2021
Posts: 300
Own Kudos:
80
 [2]
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 300
Kudos: 80
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Green12345554
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 10 Aug 2019
Last visit: 26 Jan 2022
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 166
Location: India
Schools: ISB '23 (A)
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
Schools: ISB '23 (A)
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V41
Posts: 8
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
shameekv1989
Joined: 14 Dec 2019
Last visit: 17 Jun 2021
Posts: 820
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 354
Location: Poland
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V27
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 3: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Consumer Electronics)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
globaldesi
The new terrorism-prevention laws enable police officers to single out suspicious-looking men and women, exact brief searches of their belongings, and, if such searches do not conclude by the officers being satisfied, to hold the suspects for questioning.
A. by the officers being satisfied, to hold
B. by the officers satisfaction, hold
C. with the officers' being satisfied, holding
D. to the "ficers' satisfaction, holy
E. to the officers' satisfaction, holding

globaldesi
Is option D. to the "ficers' satisfaction, holy correctly typed?
User avatar
shameekv1989
Joined: 14 Dec 2019
Last visit: 17 Jun 2021
Posts: 820
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 354
Location: Poland
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V27
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 3: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Consumer Electronics)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
globaldesi
The new terrorism-prevention laws enable police officers to single out suspicious-looking men and women, exact brief searches of their belongings, and, if such searches do not conclude by the officers being satisfied, to hold the suspects for questioning.
A. by the officers being satisfied, to hold
B. by the officers satisfaction, hold
C. with the officers' being satisfied, holding
D. to the "ficers' satisfaction, holy
E. to the officers' satisfaction, holding

"conclude by" is incorrect in A and B. We need a noun who actually concludes to go with "by"; "officers satisfaction" can not conclude anything on its own.

we need "hold" at the end for parallelism so C and E are out.

Only D remains, it should be "hold" at the end and I don't know whether "ficers' is a valid alternative to officers' nonetheless, I feel D should be the answer.
User avatar
globaldesi
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Last visit: 03 Jun 2025
Posts: 1,157
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 67
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '18 (D)
GPA: 3.97
WE:Project Management (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
Schools: ISB '18 (D)
Posts: 1,157
Kudos: 1,941
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shameekv1989
globaldesi
The new terrorism-prevention laws enable police officers to single out suspicious-looking men and women, exact brief searches of their belongings, and, if such searches do not conclude by the officers being satisfied, to hold the suspects for questioning.
A. by the officers being satisfied, to hold
B. by the officers satisfaction, hold
C. with the officers' being satisfied, holding
D. to the "ficers' satisfaction, holy
E. to the officers' satisfaction, holding

"conclude by" is incorrect in A and B. We need a noun who actually concludes to go with "by"; "officers satisfaction" can not conclude anything on its own.

we need "hold" at the end for parallelism so C and E are out.

Only D remains, it should be "hold" at the end and I don't know whether "ficers' is a valid alternative to officers' nonetheless, I feel D should be the answer.
apologies for mistype.Corrected the option now
User avatar
ajaygaur319
Joined: 05 May 2019
Last visit: 01 Jan 2021
Posts: 126
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 143
Location: India
Posts: 126
Kudos: 654
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
The new terrorism-prevention laws enable police officers to single out suspicious-looking men and women, exact brief searches of their belongings, and, if such searches do not conclude by the officers being satisfied, to hold the suspects for questioning.
A. by the officers being satisfied, to hold
B. by the officers satisfaction, hold
C. with the officers' being satisfied, holding
D. to the officers' satisfaction, hold
E. to the officers' satisfaction, holding

The new terrorism-prevention laws enable police officers to single out suspicious-looking men and women, exact brief searches of their belongings, and, if such searches do not conclude by the officers being satisfied, to hold the suspects for questioning.

Instead of to hold, there should be just hold hold to make the list parallel.

A, C & E is out

Between B and D, B doesn't have apostrophe over officers. Hence D is the correct answer
avatar
arpita1995
Joined: 03 Nov 2019
Last visit: 20 May 2023
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.84
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclude to is idiomatic, and to retain parallelism the last verb should be in simple present tense i.e hold, hence d

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
globaldesi
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Last visit: 03 Jun 2025
Posts: 1,157
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 67
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '18 (D)
GPA: 3.97
WE:Project Management (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
Schools: ISB '18 (D)
Posts: 1,157
Kudos: 1,941
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official answer
(D) This question tests idioms and parallelism. This sentence presents a list of activities that are permitted by the new laws. Parallelism dictates that these activities must be in the same grammatical form: Officers are allowed to 'single out suspicious-looking men and women, enact brief searches of their belongings, and... hold the suspects for questioning.'
User avatar
GMATDr
Joined: 22 May 2019
Last visit: 18 Apr 2020
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, Entrepreneurship
Schools: IMD '21
WE:Brand Management (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Schools: IMD '21
Posts: 25
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
globaldesi
The new terrorism-prevention laws enable police officers to single out suspicious-looking men and women, exact brief searches of their belongings, and, if such searches do not conclude by the officers being satisfied, to hold the suspects for questioning.
A. by the officers being satisfied, to hold
B. by the officers satisfaction, hold
C. with the officers' being satisfied, holding
D. to the officers' satisfaction, hold
E. to the officers' satisfaction, holding

In this sentence since there are three actions that the new law enables officers to do, these three actions have to be grammatically & logically parallel.
Since there is an infinitive to single out in first, either we need a choice that has infinitives in all 3 actions or only in the first one. Based on this, we can easily eliminate options A, C & E (A for using infinitive in 2 and not 3 actions, C & E for using -ing to describe third).
In B even if we ignore the correct idiom, it still has an error in Officers which is a plural. Here we require a possessive which we can find in option D.

Therefore, D is the best choice based on all requirements.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,831
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts