Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
In this GMAT experience talk show, we talk to Anurag Wadhwa, an Electrical Engineer from IIT Roorkee who scored 725 in his last GMAT Focus exam solely by solving official questions and taking numerous mocks in the final phase of his preparation.
Most GMAT Quant mistakes are avoidable if you recognize the hidden number properties! In this advanced GMAT Quant session, Manhattan Prep Instructor Alex decodes frequently-tested number properties like odds and evens, divisibility, exponents, and more.
Join the Easter Egg Scavenger Hunt (April 6 - 20 2025) Here is how it works - there are 14 Easter-themed logos/images scattered around the website. When you see one - click it and you will see a pop-up image similar to the one above.
In this webinar, Senior Verbal Expert- Sunita Singhvi will break down the toughest MSR questions, providing you with a step-by-step roadmap to reduce solving time, boost accuracy and navigate through them effectively to score high on GMAT.
MAT Boldface questions intimidate most test-takers—but what if they're easier than you think? GMAT expert Arun debunks common misconceptions about Boldface questions which are an important component of GMAT Critical Reasoning.
The Papuan languages of the islands east of mainland Papua New Guinea, including the Bismarcks, Bougainville, Solomons, and Louisiade Archipelago, have almost no detectable similarities in vocabulary. In contrast to neighboring Austronesian languages, linguistic analysis of these Papuan languages done by comparison of vocabularies cannot determine their historical relationships. We thus have reason to believe that ancient Papuans arrived on the islands longer than 5,000 or 7,000 years ago, where the various groups have lived in relative isolation from one another.
On the basis of the fact that grammar changes more slowly than vocabulary, researchers developed a new method of discerning relationships, including historical relationships, on the basis of grammatical similarities. Applying this method to the Papuan languages, the researchers found, as expected, that the relationships correlated with the islands and archipelagos on which the languages occur.
One interesting result was this. Although Bougainville lies between the Solomon Islands and the Bismarcks, the languages of the Solomons grammatically fell in between those of the Bismarcks and Bougainville. The researchers hypothesize that this discrepancy arose because, ten thousand years ago, Bougainville and the Solomons were joined in a single land mass, facilitating migration, while the Bismarcks were separate.
The diagram shows the grammatical relationships between the languages. For example, because the node at which Kuot is located is between those for Lavukaleve and Mali, Kuot grammatically falls in between Lavukaleve and Mali. Distances between nodes are rough indicators of grammatical distance, and color indicates archipelago or major island.
The map shows the locations of speakers of existing Papuan languages, together with a possible migration route from Papua New Guinea that may be consistent with the researchers’ hypothesis.
The two groups are more different from one another in their grammatical features than some groups of neighboring Austronesian languages are.: YES
They have few words, if any, determined by the researchers to be the same as words of the others.: YES
They evolved more recently than did Jabem or Gapapalwa, spoken on Papua New Guinea.: NO
The two groups are more different from one another in their grammatical features than some groups of neighboring Austronesian languages are.: YES
They have few words, if any, determined by the researchers to be the same as words of the others.: YES
They evolved more recently than did Jabem or Gapapalwa, spoken on Papua New Guinea.: NO
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Select the radio buttons below and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
27%
(03:32)
correct 73%
(03:54)
wrong
based on 641
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
ID: 700154
For each of the following statements about the Papuan languages of the Louisiade Archipelago and the Solomons, select Yes if the statement is strongly suggested by the discussion and research results pertaining to the Papuan languages. Otherwise, select No.
YES
NO
The two groups are more different from one another in their grammatical features than some groups of neighboring Austronesian languages are.
They have few words, if any, determined by the researchers to be the same as words of the others.
They evolved more recently than did Jabem or Gapapalwa, spoken on Papua New Guinea.
Submit Answer
Start the Timer above, select the radio buttons, and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Select the radio buttons above and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log
The two groups are more different from one another in their grammatical features than some groups of neighboring Austronesian languages are.: YES
They have few words, if any, determined by the researchers to be the same as words of the others.: YES
They evolved more recently than did Jabem or Gapapalwa, spoken on Papua New Guinea.: NO
Lavukaleve and Kuot may be less closely related than the language tree shows them as being.
Lavukaleve and Kuot may be less closely related than the language tree shows them as being.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Select the radio buttons below and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
75%
(02:01)
correct 25%
(02:10)
wrong
based on 457
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
ID: 700152
On the assumption that the migration patterns depicted in the migration map are correct, and that there were no other routes of migration of the groups under consideration, which one of the following is most strongly suggested?
Lavukaleve and Savosavo may be less closely related than the language tree shows them as being.
Lavukaleve and Ata may be more closely related than the language tree shows them as being.
Lavukaleve and Kuot may be less closely related than the language tree shows them as being.
Lavukaleve and Motuna may be less closely related than the language tree shows them as being.
Lavukaleve and Bilua may be less closely related than the language tree shows them as being.
Submit Answer
Start the Timer above, select the radio buttons, and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Select the radio buttons above and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log
Yélî Dnye is more closely related in grammar to Rotokas than to Nasioi.: Yes
The languages of Bougainville grammatically fall in between those of the Solomon Islands and the Bismarcks.: No
Kuot originates from a predominant language that was spoken where Mali is now spoken.: No
Yélî Dnye is more closely related in grammar to Rotokas than to Nasioi.: Yes
The languages of Bougainville grammatically fall in between those of the Solomon Islands and the Bismarcks.: No
Kuot originates from a predominant language that was spoken where Mali is now spoken.: No
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Select the radio buttons below and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
47%
(01:45)
correct 53%
(01:54)
wrong
based on 544
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
ID: 700153
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is strongly implied by the researchers’ results and hypotheses. Otherwise select No.
Yes
No
Yélî Dnye is more closely related in grammar to Rotokas than to Nasioi.
The languages of Bougainville grammatically fall in between those of the Solomon Islands and the Bismarcks.
Kuot originates from a predominant language that was spoken where Mali is now spoken.
Submit Answer
Start the Timer above, select the radio buttons, and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Select the radio buttons above and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log
Yélî Dnye is more closely related in grammar to Rotokas than to Nasioi.: Yes
The languages of Bougainville grammatically fall in between those of the Solomon Islands and the Bismarcks.: No
Kuot originates from a predominant language that was spoken where Mali is now spoken.: No
This is a time consuming tough question due to the sheer amount of confusing data given! But the questions are staright forward once you understand the data.
Papua New Guinea (PNG) mainland has Austronesian languages (which are similar in vocabularies) The islands east of PNG have Papuan languages (no similarities in vocabulary)
Grammar changes more slowly than vocabulary. Since Papuan languages had no common vocab, their grammars were compared and similarities were found.
So we know that PNG mainland laguages which are similar in vocab must be similar in grammar too (because grammar changes more slowly than vocabulary) The Papuan languages on the other hand are similar only in grammar, not vocab since their vocab has evolved and changed over time. But grammar has still remained similar.
For each of the following statements about the Papuan languages of the Louisiade Archipelago and the Solomons, select Yes if the statement is strongly suggested by the discussion and research results pertaining to the Papuan languages. Otherwise, select No.
The two groups are more different from one another in their grammatical features than some groups of neighboring Austronesian languages are.
YES. We can deduce that grammar of Austronesian languages will be very similar since their vocabs (which change faster than grammar) are still similar. But Papua languages have evolved more individually so their vocabs have changed though grammar is still similar since it takes longer to change. ANSWER
They have few words, if any, determined by the researchers to be the same as words of the others.
YES. The Papuan languages have "almost no detectable similarities in vocabulary" ANSWER
They evolved more recently than did Jabem or Gapapalwa, spoken on Papua New Guinea.
NO. Jabem and Gapapalwa are spoken on the PNG mainland. The Papua languages evolved before them because their vocabs are all different. The vocabs of PNG mainland languages are similar so they are more recent. ANSWER
Option 1: "The two groups are more different from one another in their grammatical features than some groups of neighboring Austronesian languages are."
First sentence of the discussion tab states - "have almost no detectable similarities in vocabulary". However it does not speak about the grammatical similarities which is asked in the first option. Hence it should be "No". Can you please enlighten me why my understanding is incorrect?
But the correct answer is "YES". I also have similar doubt. KarishmaBMartyMurray Can you please provide your insight ?
dushyantshukla
Option 1: "The two groups are more different from one another in their grammatical features than some groups of neighboring Austronesian languages are."
First sentence of the discussion tab states - "have almost no detectable similarities in vocabulary". However it does not speak about the grammatical similarities which is asked in the first option. Hence it should be "No". Can you please enlighten me why my understanding is incorrect?
This is a time consuming tough question due to the sheer amount of confusing data given! But the questions are staright forward once you understand the data.
Papua New Guinea (PNG) mainland has Austronesian languages (which are similar in vocabularies) The islands east of PNG have Papuan languages (no similarities in vocabulary)
Grammar changes more slowly than vocabulary. Since Papuan languages had no common vocab, their grammars were compared and similarities were found.
So we know that PNG mainland laguages which are similar in vocab must be similar in grammar too (because grammar changes more slowly than vocabulary) The Papuan languages on the other hand are similar only in grammar, not vocab since their vocab has evolved and changed over time. But grammar has still remained similar.
For each of the following statements about the Papuan languages of the Louisiade Archipelago and the Solomons, select Yes if the statement is strongly suggested by the discussion and research results pertaining to the Papuan languages. Otherwise, select No.
The two groups are more different from one another in their grammatical features than some groups of neighboring Austronesian languages are.
YES. We can deduce that grammar of Austronesian languages will be very similar since their vocabs (which change faster than grammar) are still similar. But Papua languages have evolved more individually so their vocabs have changed though grammar is still similar since it takes longer to change. ANSWER
They have few words, if any, determined by the researchers to be the same as words of the others.
YES. The Papuan languages have "almost no detectable similarities in vocabulary" ANSWER
They evolved more recently than did Jabem or Gapapalwa, spoken on Papua New Guinea.
NO. Jabem and Gapapalwa are spoken on the PNG mainland. The Papua languages evolved before them because their vocabs are all different. The vocabs of PNG mainland languages are similar so they are more recent. ANSWER
Thank you for taking the time to explain! The question is utterly convoluted. I will probably apply "guess and move on" to this question.
KarishmaB would you please clarufy further where will i get that The vocabs of PNG mainland languages are similar?
KarishmaB
This is a time consuming tough question due to the sheer amount of confusing data given! But the questions are staright forward once you understand the data.
Papua New Guinea (PNG) mainland has Austronesian languages (which are similar in vocabularies) The islands east of PNG have Papuan languages (no similarities in vocabulary)
Grammar changes more slowly than vocabulary. Since Papuan languages had no common vocab, their grammars were compared and similarities were found.
So we know that PNG mainland laguages which are similar in vocab must be similar in grammar too (because grammar changes more slowly than vocabulary) The Papuan languages on the other hand are similar only in grammar, not vocab since their vocab has evolved and changed over time. But grammar has still remained similar.
For each of the following statements about the Papuan languages of the Louisiade Archipelago and the Solomons, select Yes if the statement is strongly suggested by the discussion and research results pertaining to the Papuan languages. Otherwise, select No.
The two groups are more different from one another in their grammatical features than some groups of neighboring Austronesian languages are.
YES. We can deduce that grammar of Austronesian languages will be very similar since their vocabs (which change faster than grammar) are still similar. But Papua languages have evolved more individually so their vocabs have changed though grammar is still similar since it takes longer to change. ANSWER
They have few words, if any, determined by the researchers to be the same as words of the others.
YES. The Papuan languages have "almost no detectable similarities in vocabulary" ANSWER
They evolved more recently than did Jabem or Gapapalwa, spoken on Papua New Guinea.
NO. Jabem and Gapapalwa are spoken on the PNG mainland. The Papua languages evolved before them because their vocabs are all different. The vocabs of PNG mainland languages are similar so they are more recent. ANSWER.
KarishmaB would you please clarufy further where will i get that The vocabs of PNG mainland languages are similar?
Given: The Papuan languages of the islands east of mainland PNG, including the Bismarcks, Bougainville, Solomons, and Louisiade Archipelago, have almost no detectable similarities in vocabulary. In contrast to neighboring Austronesian languages (of mainland PNG because they are the neighbouring languages), linguistic analysis of these Papuan languages done by comparison of vocabularies cannot determine their historical relationships.
We are given that vocabs of Papuan languages are not similar. This is in contrast to Austronesian languages. Hence vocab of Austronesian languages must be similar.
Here, the first Yes or No Question asks us to compare the following:
1.Papuan languages of the Louisiade Archipelago and the Solomons 2.Some groups of neighboring Austronesian languages
The confusing part of the question is that it seems like the grammatical features of some groups of neighboring Austronesian languages are not being discussed.
How to solve this:
1.The reason grammatical features are discussed is that researchers hypothesized that vocabulary changes faster than grammar. So, grammar takes more time to change. 2.Hence, we can deduce that if vocabulary is still similar, then grammar definitely has to be still similar. 3.As neighboring Austronesian languages have similar vocabulary, they will definitely have similar grammar. 4.Therefore, the Papuan languages of the Louisiade Archipelago and the Solomons will be more different than neighboring Austronesian languages in their grammatical features.
Answer : YES
2 - They have few words, if any, determined by the researchers to be the same as words of the others. Answer : YES Clearly mentioned that the Papuan languages of the Louisiade Archipelago and the Solomons do not have similar vocab
3 - They evolved more recently than did Jabem or Gapapalwa, spoken on Papua New Guinea. Answer : No Reason: 1.Jabem or Gapapalwa are spoken on Papua New Guinea 2."We thus have reason to believe that ancient Papuans arrived on the islands longer than 5,000 or 7,000 years ago, where the various groups have lived in relative isolation from one another." 3.So they evolved before (NOT more recently) than did Jabem or Gapapalwa
Another q on this set- For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is strongly implied by the researchers’ results and hypotheses. Otherwise select No.
Yes No Yélî Dnye is more closely related in grammar to Rotokas than to Nasioi.
Yes No The languages of Bougainville grammatically fall in between those of the Solomon Islands and the Bismarcks.
Yes No Kuot originates from a predominant language that was spoken where Mali is now spoken.
The official answer for first is "Yes". But can this statement be strongly implied. If the flowchart distances are just a "rough indicator"
On the assumption that the migration patterns depicted in the migration map are correct, and that there were no other routes of migration of the groups under consideration, which one of the following is most strongly suggested?
Evaluate
A can be ruled out because Lavukaleve and Savosavo are moderately distant in the language tree and have closely connected migration routes, and so if anything, the migration patterns depicted suggest they may be more closely related (not less closely related) than the language tree shows them as being. B can be ruled out because Lavukaleve and Ata are moderately distant in the language tree and have only distantly connected migration routes, and so if anything, the migration patterns depicted suggest they may be less closely related (not more closely related) than the language tree shows them as being. D and E can be ruled out because in each case the languages of the two islands are moderately close in the language tree and the islands have closely connected migration routes, and so in each case the information provided does not suggest the two languages may be less closely related than the language tree shows them as being.
C is correct because Lavukaleve and Kuot are very close in the language tree and have only distantly connected migration routes. Thus, while the language tree shows them to be very closely connected, the migration patterns depicted suggest otherwise. Therefore, the migration patterns strongly suggest that they may be less closely related than the language tree shows them as being. The correct answer is Lavukaleve and Kuot may be less closely related than the language tree shows them as being.
For each of the following statements, select [size=100]Yes if the statement is strongly implied by the researchers’ results and hypotheses. Otherwise select No.[/size] Infer
[size=100]RO1 In the language tree the Yélî Dnye node is closer to the Rotokas node than to the Nasioi node. The correct answer is Yes.[/size]
[size=100]RO2 The language tree shows that the languages of the Solomons Islands grammatically fall in between those of the Bougainville and the Bismarcks, and not that the languages of Bougainville grammatically fall in between those of the Solomon Islands and the Bismarcks. The correct answer is No.[/size]
RO3 Although Kuot and Mali are very close in the language tree and have closely connected migration routes, there is no support that Kuot originated from a language that was spoken where Mali is now spoken, as opposed to Mali having originated from a language spoken where Kuot is now spoken, or both languages having originated from some other place. The correct answer is No.
Infer RO1 The first two sentences of the Discussion tab suggest the languages of the Louisiade Archipelago and the Solomons are more different than those of some groups of neighboring Austronesian languages.
The correct answer is Yes.
RO2 This is strongly suggested in the first sentence of the Discussion tab.
The correct answer is Yes.
RO3 There is no suggestion in the information given about the timelines for languages on Papua New Guinea relative to languages on the islands east of Papua New Guinea.
The two groups are more different from one another in their grammatical features than some groups of neighboring Austronesian languages are.
Which two groups? How did we say that the two islands are different from one another? How did we then compare it with austronesian languages grammar features?
Also, which all islands mentioned are east of PG or the mainland PG?
I don't think the explanation provided here for the 3rd statement in Q1 is correct. Let's look at the statement- "In contrast to neighboring Austronesian languages, linguistic analysis of these Papuan languages done by comparison of vocabularies cannot determine their historical relationships. We thus have reason to believe that ancient Papuans arrived on the islands longer than 5,000 or 7,000 years ago, where the various groups have lived in relative isolation from one another." This statement is not talking about when the languages were evolved, rather it is talking about the migration of people. Because the languages of the islands are not similar in vocabulary, the argument suggests that ancient Papuans arrived on the islands more than 5000 or 7000 years ago.
I don't think the explanation provided here for the 3rd statement in Q1 is correct. Let's look at the statement- "In contrast to neighboring Austronesian languages, linguistic analysis of these Papuan languages done by comparison of vocabularies cannot determine their historical relationships. We thus have reason to believe that ancient Papuans arrived on the islands longer than 5,000 or 7,000 years ago, where the various groups have lived in relative isolation from one another." This statement is not talking about when the languages were evolved, rather it is talking about the migration of people. Because the languages of the islands are not similar in vocabulary, the argument suggests that ancient Papuans arrived on the islands more than 5000 or 7000 years ago.
"In contrast to neighboring Austronesian languages, linguistic analysis of these Papuan languages done by comparison of vocabularies cannot determine their historical relationships. We thus have reason to believe that ancient Papuans arrived on the islands longer than 5,000 or 7,000 years ago, where the various groups have lived in relative isolation from one another."
This indicates that the languages evolved before the languages of PNG.
Don't focus on just what is written. Try to work out the meaning of why the author is giving this information. What it implies. It is testing your comprehension skills too. Languages often have common roots. When the ancient Papuans arrived on this island many years ago, they likely shared a common language. But since they lived in relative isolation from one another, their languages evolved separately over time and now they share no vocab links. They still do share grammar links because grammar changes over even longer time frames. On the other hand PNG languages still share vocab links too because they are relatively recent languages.
For this question: "For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is strongly implied by the researchers’ results and hypotheses. Otherwise select No."
In particular, the third statement, which states: Kuot originates from a predominant language that was spoken where Mali is now spoken.
The answer's reasoning is: "Although Kuot and Mali are very close in the language tree and have closely connected migration routes, there is no support that Kuot originated from a language that was spoken where Mali is now spoken, as opposed to Mali having originated from a language spoken where Kuot is now spoken, or both languages having originated from some other place."
I understand that there's no concrete evidence that states origin, but the question does ask for if there's a strong implication - which there is - even the OG answer says that they're very close in language tree & have closely connected migration routes. Wouldn't this be a case of it strongly implying that Kuot and Mali share a common origination?
Yes, I also have the same doubt. Cause as per the language tree Yélî Dnye is more closely related in grammar to Rotokas than to Nasioi. But as per the migration map, Nasioi is nearer to Yélî Dnye than Rotokas
Riri15
Another q on this set- For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is strongly implied by the researchers’ results and hypotheses. Otherwise select No.
Yes No Yélî Dnye is more closely related in grammar to Rotokas than to Nasioi.
Yes No The languages of Bougainville grammatically fall in between those of the Solomon Islands and the Bismarcks.
Yes No Kuot originates from a predominant language that was spoken where Mali is now spoken.
The official answer for first is "Yes". But can this statement be strongly implied. If the flowchart distances are just a "rough indicator"