Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:11 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,193
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,193
Kudos: 4,759
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 950
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 950
Kudos: 208
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EtaCarnia
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 22 Aug 2025
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 73
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,193
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,193
Kudos: 4,759
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EtaCarnia
Hi ,

Is it possible to eliminate few answer choices on the basis of position of however. ?

Hello EtaCarnia,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, no; the position of "however" is acceptable in all five answer choices.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Snehakandasamy
Joined: 14 Aug 2022
Last visit: 09 Nov 2022
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
beckee529
The physical structure of the human eye enables it to sense light of wavelengths up to 0.0005 millimeters; infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength—0.1 millimeters—is too long to be registered by the eye.

(A) infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength—0.1 millimeters—is too long to be registered by the eye

(B) however, the wavelength of infrared radiation—0.1 millimeters—is too long to be registered by the eye making it invisible

(C) infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength—0.1 millimeters—is too long for the eye to register it

(D) however, because the wavelength of infrared radiation is 0.1 millimeters, it is too long for the eye to register and thus invisible

(E) however, infrared radiation has a wavelength of 0.1 millimeters that is too long for the eye to register, thus making it invisible




I don't see any usage of indicating a contrast.(however -contrast)

instead it implies a reason i.e..

the IR IS INVISIBLE TO HUMAN EYE BECAUSE ITS WAVELENGHT IS TOO LONG ----REASON-----(ITS GIVEN IN 1ST SENTENCE) THAT IT CAN PROCESS ONLY UPTO A WAVELENGTH  of .0005 (AND ANYTHING ABOVE THAT WILL BE INVISIBLE...THATS WHY IR IS INVISIBLE.)

where is a contrast implied here?

if the IR is within the prescribed range and yet is invisible to human eye then there a contradiction would be established...

please help me with the confusion.
User avatar
Ayushi1410
Joined: 24 Apr 2022
Last visit: 17 Sep 2023
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In option C, my question comes from the fact that in many questions we see that pronouns having different antecedent, makes it incorrect. So, in this case when we are already saying that first it refers to IR, then how come can we have ambiguity about the second it.

Please explain. Thanks :)

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Snehakandasamy
Joined: 14 Aug 2022
Last visit: 09 Nov 2022
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skywalker18
The physical structure of the human eye enables it to sense light of wavelengths up to 0.0005 millimeters; infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength—0.1 millimeters—is too long to be registered by the eye.
(A) infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength—0.1 millimeters—is too long to be registered by the eye - Correct
(B) however, the wavelength of infrared radiation—0.1 millimeters—is too long to be registered by the eye making it invisible - Verb- ing making illogically modifies making
(C) infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength—0.1 millimeters—is too long for the eye to register it - Pronoun it does not have clear antecedent
(D) however, because the wavelength of infrared radiation is 0.1 millimeters, it is too long for the eye to register and thus invisible - Verb invisible does not make sense
(E) however, infrared radiation has a wavelength of 0.1 millimeters that is too long for the eye to register, thus making it invisible - Illogical contrast

Answer A
intended meaning: IR is invisible because it is beyond the visible range of the human eye.

but the meaning is distorted by however
HOWEVER, must present a contrast to a fact already presented in its preceding sentence but here the sentence gives an explanation that IR cannot be viewed because it falls beyond the visible (wavelength) range of the human eye in the previous clause. Isn't it ambiguous?
is the usage of, however (apart from connecting 2 independent clauses) correct
I feel it's grammatically correct but logically wrong...
IF in case IR's wavelength falls within the visible range and yet is invisible due to some other reason then the usage of however would be precise

someone, please clear my doubt.
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Snehakandasamy

intended meaning: IR is invisible because it is beyond the visible range of the human eye.

but the meaning is distorted by however
HOWEVER, must present a contrast to a fact already presented in its preceding sentence but here the sentence gives an explanation that IR cannot be viewed because it falls beyond the visible (wavelength) range of the human eye in the previous clause. Isn't it ambiguous?
I don't see the "ambiguity" here. The sentence is basically saying: human eye can sense wavelengths up to 0.0005 millimeters; however, since IR has a longer wavelength, it is invisible to human eye.

So, light of wavelengths up to 0.0005 millimeters is visible; however (that's the contrast) light of wavelengths > 0.0005 millimeters is not visible.

Quote:

is the usage of, however (apart from connecting 2 independent clauses) correct
"however" is not really connecting 2 independent clauses. Since the sentence has two independent clauses, a "semicolon" is being used to "connect" these two independent clauses. In other words, without the semicolon, the sentence would be a run-on sentence and would be wrong.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses run-on sentences, their application and examples in significant detail. If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,836
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,836
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts