I'll answer the toughest of the lot.
3. It can be inferred from the passage that Shakespeare strove for a “narrative arc” (Highlighted) that
(A) rose to a moment of intense conflict before reaching an ambiguous and ironic conclusion.
(B) manipulated audience reaction over a continuum of emotional response from horror to relief.
(C) employed plot twists and reversals in order to create the surprise ending of a new political order.
(D) provided a high degree of verisimilitude with the actual events of English his- tory.
(E) capitalized on the dramatic tension supplied by evildoing and eventual atonement for it.
We can easily come down to B,C and E. Now here is where the fun begins - they all look correct!
How do we deal with this? Usually look at each individual words and try to critic their usage.
In this question, the phrase - "narrative arc" is used. ARC. Think about how an arc looks like -- a quarter circle is an arc! So an arc is continuous which is in line with the word "continuum" in B. Also it does not frequently changes its course - it goes from one state to the other. But in C, the usage of "plot twists" means this does not really relate to an arc. Then the fatal word "reversal" is also used which is enforcing the fact that this is not a narrative arc. Furthermore, the author states - "narrative arc toward an uplifting ending" which means the narrative of the story goes from BAD --> GOOD (1 state change, not multiple). We can eliminate C.
E is slightly easier to eliminate as when you are quick-reading E, it seems like this is a good choice. However the word "atonement" is used. It would have made perfect sense if Richard III after killing his nephews (BAD) did a good deed (something what Ashoka did for example). But in this passage there was no atonement of any kind, as he was succeeded by another bloke Henry VII.
B is the winner.