It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 17:25

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The president s nominees to federal circuit courts have been

Author Message
SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1545

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 2

The president s nominees to federal circuit courts have been [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2008, 21:33
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The president’s nominees to federal circuit courts have been judged conservative for their stands on hot-button issues. But a review of their financial disclosure forms and Senate questionnaires reveals that the nominees are more notable for their close ties to corporate and economic interests, especially the energy and mining industries. Some of them were paid lobbyists for those same interests. Further, the nominees with industry ties were overwhelmingly appointed to circuit courts regarded as traditional battlegrounds over litigation affecting these industries. Independent observers who follow the federal bench believe that the extensive corporate involvement among so many of the nominees is unprecedented.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface pay which of the following roles?

A. The first is a generalization that the author aims to attack; the second is that attack.
B. The first is a pattern that the author acknowledges as true; the second is the author’s conclusion based on that acknowledgment.
C. The first is a phenomenon that the author accepts as true; the second is evidence in support of the author’s conclusion.
D. The first is the author’s position based on the evidence cited; the second is a pattern presented in support of that position.
E. The first is an exception to a rule introduced in the argument; the second provides the reasoning behind the exception.

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 2

Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 781

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2008, 22:49
Conclusion: the extensive corporate involvement among so many of the nominees is unprecedented.
Boldface1: Opposes the conclusion
Boldface2: Supports the conclusion

A. The first is a generalization that the author aims to attack; the second is that attack.[First is generalization that author acknowledges as true – eliminate it]

B. The first is a pattern that the author acknowledges as true; the second is the author’s conclusion based on that acknowledgment.[Second is not conclusion – eliminate it]

C. The first is a phenomenon that the author accepts as true; the second is evidence in support of the author’s conclusion.[Hold it]

D. The first is the author’s position based on the evidence cited; the second is a pattern presented in support of that position. [First is generalization – eliminate it]

E. The first is an exception to a rule introduced in the argument; the second provides the reasoning behind the exception. [First is generalization – eliminate it]

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Presidents   [#permalink] 03 Feb 2008, 22:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by