Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:13 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:13
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
maheshsrini
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Last visit: 06 Aug 2015
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
607
 [21]
Given Kudos: 33
GPA: 4
WE:Programming (Computer Software)
Posts: 76
Kudos: 607
 [21]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
17
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
ChrisLele
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Last visit: 27 Jul 2020
Posts: 295
Own Kudos:
4,793
 [9]
Given Kudos: 2
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 295
Kudos: 4,793
 [9]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 987
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 987
Kudos: 1,923
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Yellkrishna
Joined: 12 Dec 2019
Last visit: 21 Apr 2021
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 53
Kudos: 41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. No. Quite the opposite. With changing geopolitics, the argument says that the public now might not support the defence budget.

B. The threat in the past is the cause for high defence budget, lack of that threat is now the cause for perceived lack of support. So no.

C. The argument seeks to establish that public might not support the size of the defence budget. It does not presuppose this conclusion as fact.

D. The conclusion is that there might not be support for an adequate defence budget. It gives some reasons for it. So no.

E. The term adequate is not defined properly in the argument. How much less it adequate? 90% or only 10%. If that is evaluated, then the argument gets more clear. So E.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,836
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,836
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts