Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 08:01 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 08:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,420
Own Kudos:
778,537
 [7]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,420
Kudos: 778,537
 [7]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AyushiSwamy12
Joined: 14 May 2025
Last visit: 13 Aug 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,420
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,420
Kudos: 778,537
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SUSHANTH1252
Joined: 20 May 2025
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think the answer should be D . Because negating that option will destroy the conclusion
User avatar
harshvardhanindia
Joined: 04 Oct 2024
Last visit: 21 Sep 2025
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
3
 [2]
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 3
Kudos: 3
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
conclusion =almost none are caught therefore remove restrictions .

i think it was between A&E but E was stronger as (E)Criminals are hardly likely to carry restricted items with them on an airline. NEGATIVE becomes criminals are very likely to carry the restricted items with them on an airline .
So the ones caught are criminals or mostly criminals and therefore removing restrictions could allow criminals to bring restricted stuff.

(A) The restrictions themselves do not discourage people from carrying restricted items on to airplanes. NEGATIVE BECOMES the restrictions themselves discourage people from carrying restricted items to airplanes hence removing them will be= more people carrying
restricted items

so in my head E broke the argument more but i still need clarity on this question
User avatar
hehehuhuhihi
Joined: 09 May 2025
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can someone kindly explain why the correct answer should be A instead of E?
User avatar
APram
Joined: 23 Jun 2024
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 674
Own Kudos:
263
 [2]
Given Kudos: 240
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q86 V78 DI76
GPA: 3.608
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q86 V78 DI76
Posts: 674
Kudos: 263
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The correct answer should be A

Premise: In any case only 2% traveller's are ever caught with restricted items

Conclusion: Better to remove restriction.


(A)The restrictions themselves do not discourage people from carrying restricted items on to airplanes.

This assumption leads to conclusion as if restriction is not discouraging people then it doesn't matter if we keep restriction or not

(B) The restrictions have been implemented all across the world.
This is too extreme.

(C) There is no scope for corrupt practices on the part of those enforcing these restrictions.
This is new information and is still extreme of totally no scope

(D) There have been instances when an innocent traveler has been wrongly detained by over cautious airline personnel.
No information regarding innocent travellers being caught or non innocent travellers

(E) Criminals are hardly likely to carry restricted items with them on an airline.
This is too extreme for criminals to be thought of 2%. It can be more and likeliness of them carrying restricted items cannot be negated as per the passage.

Please give kudos if you like the explanation!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,420
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,420
Kudos: 778,537
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The restrictions on what one can carry inside an airplane are surely too severe. Airlines these days issue a long checklist of items that cannot be carried inside an aircraft making it cumbersome for the travelers to keep a track of all these items. In any case, barely two percent of travelers are ever caught with these restricted items, so it’s best if these restrictions are removed.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The restrictions themselves do not discourage people from carrying restricted items on to airplanes.

(B) The restrictions have been implemented all across the world.

(C) There is no scope for corrupt practices on the part of those enforcing these restrictions.

(D) There have been instances when an innocent traveler has been wrongly detained by over cautious airline personnel.

(E) Criminals are hardly likely to carry restricted items with them on an airline.

Official Explanation



Answer: A

The argument concludes that since only 2% of airline travelers are caught with restricted items, it doesn’t make sense to have these restrictions in the first place. The argument assumes that it is not the restrictions themselves that prevent the other 98% of people from carrying restricted items on to airplanes.

(A) The correct answer.

(B) This has no connection with the reasoning in the argument.

(C) Whether there is scope for corruption on the part of those enforcing these restrictions is outside the purview of the argument.

(D) This could be an example of a problem with having the restrictions but is definitely not an assumption in the argument.

(E) This could be because of the restrictions; if the restrictions were not there, the criminals would most likely carry such items with them on to airplanes.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts