Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 08:05 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 08:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
SchruteDwight
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Last visit: 30 Mar 2023
Posts: 167
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 923
Location: Netherlands
GPA: 4
Products:
Posts: 167
Kudos: 113
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
aniket16c
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 20 Oct 2018
Last visit: 05 Feb 2024
Posts: 180
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 4
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 180
Kudos: 154
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Snehaaa
Joined: 04 Feb 2019
Last visit: 11 Sep 2020
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 146
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
Posts: 14
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Snehaaa
Isn’t “provided” modifying “telescopes in option A?

Posted from my mobile device
Hi Sneha, provided is the main verb in this sentence and hence, isn't really modifying anything.

The core of the sentence is:

...disintegration provided new insights..
avatar
Pedro121212
Joined: 20 Dec 2020
Last visit: 11 Mar 2021
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I do not understand why the parallelism imposed by "and" allows both verbs to be in two different verb tenses: "provided" and "may thus force"?
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [2]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pedro121212
I do not understand why the parallelism imposed by "and" allows both verbs to be in two different verb tenses: "provided" and "may thus force"?
Hi Pedro121212,

My reply is not specific to this question, but there is no such thing as "tense parallelism". To be more precise, there is no reason to always expect verbs joined by an and to have the same tense. This is actually a meaning call. For example:
He received the memo yesterday and will submit his application tomorrow.

There is nothing wrong with the will submit here.
User avatar
svasan05
User avatar
CrackVerbal Representative
Joined: 02 Mar 2019
Last visit: 24 Feb 2023
Posts: 269
Own Kudos:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 269
Kudos: 302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes provided new insights into how comets form and may thus force a rethinking of the role of comets in the delivery of organic compounds to the evolving Earth.

(A) The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes provided new insights into how comets form and may thus force Correct answer - no apparent errors.

(B) The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full view of ground- as well as space-based telescopes, provided new insights into how comets form and thus possibly forcing "provided" is not parallel to "forcing". Eliminate.

(C) When a comet's spectacular disintegration occurred in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes last year, it provided new insights into how comets form and thus may possibly force "provided" is not parallel to "may force". Eliminate.

(D) Last year, in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes, a comet's spectacular disintegration provided new insights into how comets form and thus possibly forcing Same error as in (B). Eliminate.

(E) Last year, in full view of ground- as well as space-based telescopes, the spectacular disintegration of a comet has provided new insights into how comets form and may thus force "Last year" is too far away from "disintegration" which it modifies. Eliminate.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 360
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle
Snehaaa
Isn’t “provided” modifying “telescopes in option A?

Posted from my mobile device
Hi Sneha, provided is the main verb in this sentence and hence, isn't really modifying anything.

The core of the sentence is:

...disintegration provided new insights..

This confused me, if "ed-verb" is followed after a noun it modifies the preceding noun?
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,886
 [1]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,886
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lakshya14
EducationAisle
Snehaaa
Isn’t “provided” modifying “telescopes in option A?

Posted from my mobile device
Hi Sneha, provided is the main verb in this sentence and hence, isn't really modifying anything.

The core of the sentence is:

...disintegration provided new insights..

This confused me, if "ed-verb" is followed after a noun it modifies the preceding noun?


Hello lakshya14,

I will be glad to help you with this one. :-)

In the original sentence, the word "provided" is NOT a verb-ed modifier. It is the simple past tense for the subject "disintegration". The sentence says the spectacular disintegration of the comet provided new insights. The disintegration provided or gave new insights into something. The disintegration was not provided by anything.

Please go through our very popular article "ED Forms - Verbs or Modifiers" on GMAT Club by clicking on the following link. This article teaches how to distinguish between the simple past tense verb and the verb-ed modifier.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/ed-forms-verbs-or-modifiers-134691.html


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha


Hope this helps.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,886
 [1]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,886
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
svasan05
The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes provided new insights into how comets form and may thus force a rethinking of the role of comets in the delivery of organic compounds to the evolving Earth.

(A) The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes provided new insights into how comets form and may thus force Correct answer - no apparent errors.

(B) The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full view of ground- as well as space-based telescopes, provided new insights into how comets form and thus possibly forcing "provided" is not parallel to "forcing". Eliminate.

(C) When a comet's spectacular disintegration occurred in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes last year, it provided new insights into how comets form and thus may possibly force "provided" is not parallel to "may force". Eliminate.

(D) Last year, in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes, a comet's spectacular disintegration provided new insights into how comets form and thus possibly forcing Same error as in (B). Eliminate.

(E) Last year, in full view of ground- as well as space-based telescopes, the spectacular disintegration of a comet has provided new insights into how comets form and may thus force "Last year" is too far away from "disintegration" which it modifies. Eliminate.

Hope this helps.


Hello Sir,

Great Explanation there. Very precise and to the point. :thumbsup:

However, I would reject Choice C because of the redundancy error due to the usage of "may possibly". Two verbs in two different tenses can very well be parallel if the context allows for the same. The following is an example:

The widely accepted big-bang theory holds that the universe began in an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago and has been expanding ever since.

The Correct answer choice of this sentence also uses the same verbs - "provided" and "may force". Hence, it is evident that there is no issue with the parallelism with these two verbs.


Also, Choice E is incorrect because of the usage of the present perfect tense verb "has provided" because this action took place "Last year". The sentence explicitly says that the action of disintegration took place last year. Hence, the sentence must use the simple past tense verb.


Thanks. :-)
Shraddha
User avatar
vipulgoel
Joined: 03 May 2013
Last visit: 09 Oct 2025
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 114
Location: India
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="kaijen"]The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes provided new insights into how comets form and may thus force a rethinking of the role of comets in the delivery of organic compounds to the evolving Earth.


(A) The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes provided new insights into how comets form and may thus force



I think "provided" modifier in A only modifying "space-based telescopes", however we need both subjects "The spectacular disintegration of a comet" and "space-based telescopes" to be referred hence we might need comma + ed modifier
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vipulgoel
I think "provided" modifier in A only modifying "space-based telescopes", however we need both subjects "The spectacular disintegration of a comet" and "space-based telescopes" to be referred hence we might need comma + ed modifier
Hi vipulgoel,

Provided is a verb in option A. You may want to go through these posts.
User avatar
Tanvi01
Joined: 24 Jan 2021
Last visit: 15 Aug 2023
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 20
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can you please provide detailed solution for this. I rejected A because I thought 'may thus force...' is confusing and it should be 'thus may force...' as used in option C. IMO in option C 'it' refers to disintegration.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [2]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tanvi01


First, be careful about throwing out answers based on small variations in word order (may thus/thus may) unless you KNOW one of the versions creates an error. If you don't know that one is wrong, treat them both as valid and look for something else.

So what else is there? First, there's a meaning problem with C. Sure, "it" refers to disintegration, which is the subject of A, as well. However, in A the subject is modified, such that the full subject is really EVERYTHING before the verb: the disintegration of the comet IN VIEW OF TELESCOPES." Since C doesn't apply a modifier to the subject, it implies that the disintegration ALONE provided insights, etc. This isn't right.

Also, as others have pointed out, "may possibly" is redundant. There's just no good reason to pick C, and we don't want to let "may thus" put us off A and leave us scrambling for clunky alternatives.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I should add that we can't eliminate C based on parallelism, as some of the posts above have done. Both A and C use a past tense verb (provided) and a present tense verb phrase (may force). It's okay to make these parallel as long as the meaning makes sense, and it does. (Something happened before, and now something else may happen.) If C weren't parallel, then A wouldn't be, either.
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 805
Kudos: 170
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes provided new insights into how comets form and may thus force a rethinking of the role of comets in the delivery of organic compounds to the evolving Earth.

(A) The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes provided new insights into how comets form and may thus force - AND is a parallel marker. Clause AND Clause - perfect.

(B) The spectacular disintegration of a comet last year in full view of ground- as well as space-based telescopes, provided new insights into how comets form and thus possibly forcing - comma + provided is no longer a verb. Now provided is acting as a verbal modifying the nearest noun i.e. telescopes. So, there is no VERB. The sentence is a fragment.

(C) When a comet's spectacular disintegration occurred in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes last year, it provided new insights into how comets form and thus may possibly force - "it" referring to the act of disintegration - the use of pronoun for action is wrong.

(D) Last year, in full view of ground- and space-based telescopes, a comet's spectacular disintegration provided new insights into how comets form and thus possibly forcing - After AND, we have a phrase. Not parallel.

(E) Last year, in full view of ground- as well as space-based telescopes, the spectacular disintegration of a comet has provided new insights into how comets form and may thus force - last year means past. The use of present perfect for past is wrong.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts