sahilsehdev97
My issue with this question stems from Statement 2.
For Data sufficiency, we are told that statements 1 & 2 need to always be considered separate from each other until the time comes to combine the 2 statements if both are insufficient. So, when i look at statement 2 on its own, nothing about it tells me that they are consecutive. Yes, we know that the overall sum is 64, and that the greatest term is 6 more than the smallest term but we know nothing about the other 2 terms besides the fact that they are different odd numbers.
I thought the overall point about DS is to determine whether the statements provide enough info to solve the main ask of the question. Statement 1 does that but i dont think statement 2 does. Can someone please explain as to what strategies can be used to approach this question, considering the fact that time runs like a bullet train during the exam? Thanks
Bunuel
The sum of 4 different odd integers is 64. What is the value of the greatest these integers?
(1) The integers are consecutive odd numbers --> x + (x + 2) + (x + 4) + (x + 6) = 64. We can find x. Sufficient.
(2) Of these integers, the greatest is 6 more than the least --> least = x and greatest = x + 6. Between x and x + 6, there are only 2 odd integers x + 2 and x + 4, so we have the same case as above. Sufficient.
Answer: D.
You are missing a point.
The stem says that we have 4 different odd integers.
(2) says that the greatest is 6 more than the least.
Between any odd number x and x + 6, the only odd integers are x + 2 and x + 4. That gives us exactly four different odd integers: x, x + 2, x + 4, and x + 6, which matches the structure in (1).
So yes, even though it doesn’t say “consecutive,” the condition forces the same four values. Statement (2) is sufficient.