GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Jun 2018, 08:39

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The Supreme Court is no longer able to keep pace with the tremendous

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 09 Jan 2018
Posts: 59
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 4
The Supreme Court is no longer able to keep pace with the tremendous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2018, 11:18
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

92% (01:24) correct 8% (01:55) wrong based on 12 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The Supreme Court is no longer able to keep pace with the tremendous number of cases it
agrees to decide. The Court schedules and hears 160 hours of oral argument each year, and
108 hours of next year’s term will be taken up by cases left over from this year. Certainly the
Court cannot be asked to increase its already burdensome hours. The most reasonable
long-range solution to this problem is to allow the Court to decide many cases without hearing
oral argument; in this way the Court might eventually increase dramatically the number of
cases it decides each year.
Which of the following, if true, could best be used to argue against the feasibility of the solution
suggested?
A. The time the Court spends hearing oral argument is only a small part of the total time it
spends deciding a case.
B. The Court cannot legitimately avoid hearing oral argument in any case left over from last
year.
C. Most authorities agree that 160 hours of oral argument is the maximum number that the
Court can handle per year.
D. Even now the Court decides a small number of cases without hearing oral argument.
E. In many cases, the delay of a hearing for a full year can be extremely expensive to the
parties involved.
Expert Post
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 46251
Re: The Supreme Court is no longer able to keep pace with the tremendous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2018, 11:24
aanyajain20 wrote:
The Supreme Court is no longer able to keep pace with the tremendous number of cases it
agrees to decide. The Court schedules and hears 160 hours of oral argument each year, and
108 hours of next year’s term will be taken up by cases left over from this year. Certainly the
Court cannot be asked to increase its already burdensome hours. The most reasonable
long-range solution to this problem is to allow the Court to decide many cases without hearing
oral argument; in this way the Court might eventually increase dramatically the number of
cases it decides each year.
Which of the following, if true, could best be used to argue against the feasibility of the solution
suggested?
A. The time the Court spends hearing oral argument is only a small part of the total time it
spends deciding a case.
B. The Court cannot legitimately avoid hearing oral argument in any case left over from last
year.
C. Most authorities agree that 160 hours of oral argument is the maximum number that the
Court can handle per year.
D. Even now the Court decides a small number of cases without hearing oral argument.
E. In many cases, the delay of a hearing for a full year can be extremely expensive to the
parties involved.


Discussed here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-supreme- ... l#p1528025
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Re: The Supreme Court is no longer able to keep pace with the tremendous   [#permalink] 31 May 2018, 11:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The Supreme Court is no longer able to keep pace with the tremendous

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinja, GMATNinjaTwo



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.