Last visit was: 14 Jul 2026, 12:45 It is currently 14 Jul 2026, 12:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Gmatsaiyan
Joined: 05 Feb 2018
Last visit: 08 Aug 2022
Posts: 748
Own Kudos:
2,853
 [24]
Given Kudos: 139
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
GPA: 2.77
WE:General Management (Other)
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
20
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 14 Jul 2026
Posts: 16,445
Own Kudos:
52,950
 [3]
Given Kudos: 6,424
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,445
Kudos: 52,950
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 1,970
Own Kudos:
10,302
 [4]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 1,970
Kudos: 10,302
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 14 Jul 2026
Posts: 16,445
Own Kudos:
52,950
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,424
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,445
Kudos: 52,950
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

Q3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which one of following about craft unions?

Explanation

Craft unions are mentioned once and once only: as part of the “important fact,” cited by Ashenfelter, that minorities have been traditionally excluded from membership in such unions and that therefore craft unionism increases the gap between Black and White wages.

(A) paraphrases this idea that, through craft unions, more money is earned by members (largely White) than non-members (most Blacks).

(B) Nothing is said about increased membership in craft unions. If anything, the exclusion of a large number of workers would tend to depress the total.

(C) is a distortion of the comparison between craft and industrial unions. Yes, the latter have more minority members and tend to reduce the Black/White wage differential, but we never learn anything about the rate at which wages rise in different unions.

(D) We are told that right-to-work laws have a negative effect on wages of industrial workers, but we can infer that they would also affect the wages of craft union members who, as Ashenfelter reports, are mostly white.

(E) misinterprets the point made at the end of para 2 (which is rather far removed from the craft union reference). We know that a healthy economy can create a demand for workers and raise their wages. But there’s no way to tell from the info given which group—craft or industrial—would be more likely to experience wage increases under these circumstances. For all we know, the increase in wages brought on by labor shortages applies only to the industrial sector.

Answer: A

Hope it helps
User avatar
Shadyshades
Joined: 02 Nov 2020
Last visit: 10 Jul 2026
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,151
Location: India
GMAT 1: 220 Q2 V2
GMAT 1: 220 Q2 V2
Posts: 112
Kudos: 99
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN GMATNinja KarishmaB yashikaaggarwal

I am confused with the below para. There is just one word "agreements" that has created a lot of mess in my mind. I thought the word "agreements" here should be replaced with "law" but I am not sure.

The Taft-Hartley Act, passed by the United States Congress in 1947, gave states the power to enact “right-to-work” legislation that prohibits union shop agreements. According to such an agreement, a labor union negotiates wages and working conditions for all workers in a business, and all workers are required to belong to the union.


What I understood is - Congress gave states the power to make "right to work" law, the law that prohibits union shop agreements.

In these agreements, a labor union is doing negotiations on behalf of all workers.

My Question- Are we saying here that the law ,once enact, will prohibit the labor union from making negotiations ?
or Are we saying here that the law ,once enact, will let the labor union to make negotiations ?
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,489
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,489
Kudos: 7,758
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Shadyshades
AndrewN GMATNinja KarishmaB yashikaaggarwal

I am confused with the below para. There is just one word "agreements" that has created a lot of mess in my mind. I thought the word "agreements" here should be replaced with "law" but I am not sure.

The Taft-Hartley Act, passed by the United States Congress in 1947, gave states the power to enact “right-to-work” legislation that prohibits union shop agreements. According to such an agreement, a labor union negotiates wages and working conditions for all workers in a business, and all workers are required to belong to the union.


What I understood is - Congress gave states the power to make "right to work" law, the law that prohibits union shop agreements.

In these agreements, a labor union is doing negotiations on behalf of all workers.

My Question- Are we saying here that the law ,once enact, will prohibit the labor union from making negotiations ?
or Are we saying here that the law ,once enact, will let the labor union to make negotiations ?
Hello, Shadyshades. The first interpretation is the correct one, since prohibits is the governing idea. It might help to replace the phrase at the beginning of the second sentence with a modifying in which:

Quote:
The Taft-Hartley Act, passed by the United States Congress in 1947, gave states the power to enact “right-to-work” legislation that prohibits union shop agreements [in which] a labor union negotiates wages and working conditions for all workers in a business, and all workers are required to belong to the union.
Another way to arrive at an accurate interpretation is to ask yourself what is prohibited, as in, The Taft-Hartley Act... legislation that prohibits __________, and to fill in the blank accordingly. For the sake of accuracy, I should point out that it is not the passage of the Taft-Hartley Act that directly prohibits the agreements in question; rather, the act gives states the power to pass their own legislation that bans such agreements.

Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
User avatar
gullyboy09
Joined: 13 Oct 2025
Last visit: 12 Jul 2026
Posts: 282
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Products:
Posts: 282
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi KarishmaB, can you help me with my understanding of option D in Q3?

I rejected it based on the first passage that RTW affected all the unions, not only the one with Black people. It's just that black people were more impacted. So option D saying craft union not significantly impacted cannot be inferred.
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 14 Jul 2026
Posts: 1,555
Own Kudos:
13,162
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,555
Kudos: 13,162
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which one of following about craft unions?

It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which one of following about craft unions?

The passage’s key point is that craft unions traditionally excluded minority workers, and that exclusion helped increase the wage gap between White and Black workers. So the best inference is the one that fits the idea that craft-union members benefited in wages while excluded workers did not.

(A) Craft unions have been successful in ensuring that the wages of their members remain higher than the wages of nonunion workers in the same occupational groups.

This is the best answer. The passage says craft unionism increased the wage differential between White and Black workers because minority workers were traditionally excluded from craft unions. That makes sense only if membership in those craft unions brought wage advantages that excluded workers did not get.

(B) The number of minority workers joining craft unions has increased sharply in states that have not adopted right-to-work legislation.

The passage says nothing about a sharp increase in minority membership in craft unions.

(C) Wages for workers belonging to craft unions have generally risen faster and more steadily than wages for workers belonging to industrial unions.

The passage does not compare the general rate or steadiness of wage growth in craft unions and industrial unions.

(D) The wages of workers belonging to craft unions have not been significantly affected by right-to-work legislation, although the wages of workers belonging to industrial unions have been negatively affected.

The passage does not make that distinction. It says right-to-work laws weaken union power and reduce wages, not that only industrial-union wages are affected.

(E) The wages of workers belonging to craft unions are more likely to be driven up in the event of labor shortages than are the wages of workers belonging to industrial unions.

The passage mentions labor shortages only as a general condition that could drive up wages in right-to-work states. It does not compare craft unions and industrial unions on this point.

Answer: (A)
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 14 Jul 2026
Posts: 1,555
Own Kudos:
13,162
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,555
Kudos: 13,162
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
5. According to the passage, which one of the following could counteract the effects of a decrease in unions’ economic power to raise wages in right-to-work states?

The passage says that if right-to-work laws weaken unions’ power to raise wages, Black workers would suffer a disproportionate decline in relative wages. But the final sentence gives an exception: this decline could be avoided if there is strong economic growth that creates labor shortages and drives wages up. So the counteracting factor is strong growth producing labor shortages.

(A) a decrease in the number of union shop agreements

This would likely strengthen the right-to-work effect, not counteract it.

(B) strong economic growth that creates labor shortages

This is correct. The passage explicitly says Black workers’ relative economic position would decline unless strong economic growth in right-to-work states created labor shortages and thereby drove up wages.

(C) a decrease in membership in craft unions

This is not the stated counteracting factor. The passage discusses craft unions only in relation to wage differentials.

(D) the merging of large industrial unions

This is not mentioned as a counteracting factor.

(E) a decline in the craft sectors of the labor market

This is not the answer. The passage says industrial unions help Black workers, but it does not say that a decline in craft sectors would counteract weakened union wage power.

Answer: (B)
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7395 posts
702 posts
41 posts