GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 18 Jan 2019, 20:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

January 19, 2019

January 19, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
• ### FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

January 20, 2019

January 20, 2019

07:00 AM PST

07:00 AM PST

Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.

# The traditional timeframe for the fall of the Roman Empire is around 4

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Posts: 207
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
GPA: 3.97
The traditional timeframe for the fall of the Roman Empire is around 4  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 17 Sep 2018, 09:20
2
Question 1
00:00

based on 37 sessions

62% (02:31) correct 38% (03:00) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

The traditional timeframe for the fall of the Roman Empire is around 410 A.D, when the Visigoth armies breached the walls of Rome, looting the city. Many historians, however, dispute this account. They don’t argue that the events in question never happened. Rather, they argue that the way that history has traditionally understood the fall of Rome is limited by our perspective on what it means to be Roman. They argue that, depending on your definition of a “Roman” – whether the word is defined by religion, culture, or language – you could get any number of dates for the fall of Rome, from several centuries before the accepted date to over a millennium after.

Debates like this one fall under the blanket of what historians refer to as historiography, a word that literally means “history writing.” Historiography tries to take into account that, because historians are human, two historians might have vastly different interpretations of the same set of facts in light of their cultural contexts and the accounts they choose to value of the same event. So while one historian might reference the “Fall of Rome” when discussing the Visigoth attacks, another historian might reference it while discussing the end of World War I, when the last great empires considered “heirs” to the Romans were broken apart.

Importantly, historiography isn’t restricted to big events like the fall of the Roman Empire. Every time historians and teachers talk about the past, they decide which stories to privilege and which to discount. Sometimes this is because of the lack of historical documentation from certain groups, but other times it’s because those who are telling the story have an agenda. Regardless of the reason, students and scholars alike must understand that for any piece of history there are almost always multiple interpretations

The author would most likely agree with which of the following statements?
Historiography is mainly an issue of vocabulary rather than of the interpretation of events.
Historical interpretations of events are influenced by historians’ cultural backgrounds as well as the events themselves.
It is important for historians to expand their cultural contexts in order to increase the accuracy of their writings.
Differences in how an event is reported can be attributed to lack of historical resources.
Historiographical debates are often grounded in a desire to bring new narratives to light.

_________________

Please give Kudos. Kudos encourage active discussions and help the community grow

Originally posted by globaldesi on 13 Sep 2018, 18:53.
Last edited by globaldesi on 17 Sep 2018, 09:20, edited 1 time in total.
CR Forum Moderator
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Posts: 381
Re: The traditional timeframe for the fall of the Roman Empire is around 4  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2018, 19:19
globaldesi

Thanks!
_________________

Project CR Butler - 2 CR's everyday

Intern
Joined: 13 Aug 2018
Posts: 2
Re: The traditional timeframe for the fall of the Roman Empire is around 4  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2018, 06:54
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Posts: 207
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
GPA: 3.97
Re: The traditional timeframe for the fall of the Roman Empire is around 4  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2018, 09:19
1
Apologies guys.
posting OA
Whenever you are asked for a statement that the author is "most likely to agree with", you are being asked an inference question, often about the core of the author's argument. To be successful on a question like this one, it helps to examine the answer choices within the context of the passage as a whole.

Choice (A) argues that vocabulary is the main difference in historiography, not interpretation. While vocabulary is mentioned as an aspect of historiographical debate (specifically the definition of the word "Roman"), the passage mainly discusses interpretation, not vocabulary, so (A) can be eliminated.

Correct answer choice (B) gives the definition of historiography - that historian's interpretations are influenced by both the events themselves and the writer's cultural context. This is correct. You can find concrete evidence for this in paragraph two ("Historiography tries to take into account that, because historians are human, two historians might have vastly different interpretations of the same set of facts in light of their cultural contexts and the accounts they choose to value of the same event.") and in paragraph three ("Every time historians and teachers talk about the past, they decide which stories to privilege and which to discount.").

Choice (C) also mentions cultural context, but is incorrect. While the author mentions historical context as a factor in historical interpretations, there is no argument about whether historians need to expand their contexts.

Choice (D) can be eliminated because of its scope. While the author does mention lack of historical documents as a reason for some historical interpretations, it isn't the only reason given.

Choice (E) can similarly be eliminated because while the author does mention that some historiographical writings do bring new perspectives to light, no indication is given as to whether this is the primary reason that these debates occur.
_________________

Please give Kudos. Kudos encourage active discussions and help the community grow

Manager
Joined: 25 Jan 2018
Posts: 95
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Re: The traditional timeframe for the fall of the Roman Empire is around 4  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2018, 08:54
Hello globaldesi -

Could you please post all the questions of the RCs ?

Thanks,
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Posts: 207
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
GPA: 3.97
Re: The traditional timeframe for the fall of the Roman Empire is around 4  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2018, 10:48
Will post as I get more for this passage

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

Please give Kudos. Kudos encourage active discussions and help the community grow

Re: The traditional timeframe for the fall of the Roman Empire is around 4 &nbs [#permalink] 18 Sep 2018, 10:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The traditional timeframe for the fall of the Roman Empire is around 4

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.