Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1811:00 AM PST
-12:00 PM PST
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
16 Aug 2019, 02:59
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
70% (01:47) correct
30%
(02:01)
wrong
based on 369
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The translator of poetry must realize that word-for-word equivalents do not exist across languages, any more than piano sounds exist in the violin. The violin can, however, play recognizably the same music as the piano, but only if the violinist is guided by the nature and possibilities of the violin as well as by the original composition.
As applied to the act of translating poetry from one language into another, the analogy above can best be understood as saying that
(A) poetry cannot be effectively translated because, unlike music, it is composed of words with specific meanings
(B) some languages are inherently more musical and more suitable to poetic composition than others
(C) the translator should be primarily concerned with reproducing the rhythms and sound patterns of the original, not with transcribing its meaning exactly
(D) the translator must observe the spirit of the original and also the qualities of expression that characterize the language into which the original is translated
(E) poetry is easier to translate if it focuses on philosophical insights or natural descriptions rather than on subjective impressions
As applied to the act of translating poetry from one language into another, the analogy above can best be understood as saying that
(A) poetry cannot be effectively translated because, unlike music, it is composed of words with specific meanings
(B) some languages are inherently more musical and more suitable to poetic composition than others
(C) the translator should be primarily concerned with reproducing the rhythms and sound patterns of the original, not with transcribing its meaning exactly
(D) the translator must observe the spirit of the original and also the qualities of expression that characterize the language into which the original is translated
(E) poetry is easier to translate if it focuses on philosophical insights or natural descriptions rather than on subjective impressions
01 Mar 2021, 08:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
Sajjad1994
Official Explanation
This argument contains two counter-premise indicators—“however” and “but.” The author opens the argument implying that the violin cannot play the “same” music as the piano. Then the counterpremise indicator “however” introduces a qualification of this claim; namely that the violin can play recognizably the same music. “But” introduces a further qualification: the violinist should be “guided by the nature and possibilities of the violin as well as by the original composition.” This is the key to the question. By analogy the translator of poetry should be guided by (observe) the nature (spirit) of the original as well as the nature (qualities) of the language into which the original is translated. Hence the answer is (D). Note that (D) paraphrases the last clause of the argument.
(A) may be true but is irrelevant; it’s also baited with same language from the passage—“music.”
(B) is not stated in or implied by the passage.
(C) is second-best. The clause “[the translator should] not [be concerned] with transcribing its meaning exactly” is supported by the argument’s opening, “The translator of poetry must realize that word-for-word equivalents do not exist across languages.” But the author does not state that the translation should be “primarily concerned with reproducing the rhythms and sound patterns of the original.” Note the subtle use of the same language ploy: the analogy is to the translation of the meanings of words, not their sound patterns or rhythm—i.e., musical qualities.
(E) sounds like an English professor wrote it. Most often such pretentious answer-choices can be summarily dismissed.
General Discussion
panopticon
Joined: 01 Feb 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17
Given Kudos: 99
Location: Canada
Schools: Molson '20
GPA: 3.96
21 Sep 2019, 08:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
The translator of poetry must realize that word-for-word equivalents do not exist across languages, any more than piano sounds exist in the violin. The violin can, however, play recognizably the same music as the piano, but only if the violinist is guided by the nature and possibilities of the violin as well as by the original composition.
As applied to the act of translating poetry from one language into another, the analogy above can best be understood as saying that
(A) poetry cannot be effectively translated because, unlike music, it is composed of words with specific meanings.
Nowhere in the question stem does it say that poetry "cannot be effectively translated". What the question stem is saying is that "word-for-word equivalents do not exist across languages", therefore, the person who is translating must realize this to adapt the translation to, as stated in the music-based analogy, "the nature and possibilities of the new medium (violin, or language), as well as by the original composition".
(B) some languages are inherently more musical and more suitable to poetic composition than others.
It should not be too difficult to eliminate this option. Nowhere does it say that other languages may have qualities that are inherently better for music and poetry.
(C) the translator should be primarily concerned with reproducing the rhythms and sound patterns of the original, not with transcribing its meaning exactly.
One may be caught here by the last portion "not with transcribing its meaning exactly". However, we are not focused on the "rhythms and sound patterns" of the original composition. We are looking for an analogy that states that when translating poetry, it is important to focus on the nature and possibilities of the new language while being guided by the original composition.
(D) the translator must observe the spirit of the original and also the qualities of expression that characterize the language into which the original is translated.
In this option we can directly attribute "spirit of the original" and "qualities of expression that characterize the (new) language" to "nature and possibilities of the violin as well as by the original composition"
(E) poetry is easier to translate if it focuses on philosophical insights or natural descriptions rather than on subjective impressions.
We are not focused on the feasibility of translation, or the conditions required for feasible translation.
As applied to the act of translating poetry from one language into another, the analogy above can best be understood as saying that
(A) poetry cannot be effectively translated because, unlike music, it is composed of words with specific meanings.
Nowhere in the question stem does it say that poetry "cannot be effectively translated". What the question stem is saying is that "word-for-word equivalents do not exist across languages", therefore, the person who is translating must realize this to adapt the translation to, as stated in the music-based analogy, "the nature and possibilities of the new medium (violin, or language), as well as by the original composition".
(B) some languages are inherently more musical and more suitable to poetic composition than others.
It should not be too difficult to eliminate this option. Nowhere does it say that other languages may have qualities that are inherently better for music and poetry.
(C) the translator should be primarily concerned with reproducing the rhythms and sound patterns of the original, not with transcribing its meaning exactly.
One may be caught here by the last portion "not with transcribing its meaning exactly". However, we are not focused on the "rhythms and sound patterns" of the original composition. We are looking for an analogy that states that when translating poetry, it is important to focus on the nature and possibilities of the new language while being guided by the original composition.
(D) the translator must observe the spirit of the original and also the qualities of expression that characterize the language into which the original is translated.
In this option we can directly attribute "spirit of the original" and "qualities of expression that characterize the (new) language" to "nature and possibilities of the violin as well as by the original composition"
(E) poetry is easier to translate if it focuses on philosophical insights or natural descriptions rather than on subjective impressions.
We are not focused on the feasibility of translation, or the conditions required for feasible translation.
