The United States has less than half of the 215 million acres of

Question

The United States has less than half of the 215 million acres of wetlands that existed before the first European immigrants began drying out wetlands for agriculture. The mid-19th century saw the federal government award nearly 65 million acres of wetlands to 15 states in a series of Swamp Land Acts. The most rapid conversion occurred between the mid-1950s and mid-1970s, when an estimated 450,000 acres per year were lost, primarily to agriculture.

Many important public benefits have been lost converting wetlands for various development enterprises when regional planning, stronger regulation, and increased public awareness of wetland value might have avoided much of the conversion. Wetlands inhibit downstream flooding, prevent erosion along coasts and rivers, help remove or assimilate pollutants, support numerous endangered animals and plants, and provide aesthetically pleasing open spaces. Some wetlands are critical groundwater exchange areas.

At present, government intervention has only slowed the rate of loss. Even with increasing government response, wetland protection faces significant obstacles. Severe budget constraints always limit acquisition as a remedy. The Emergency Wetlands Resources Act allocates only $40 million per year in federal funds and relatively modest state funds for wetland purchase. Ultimately, only a small percentage of the approximately 95 million acres of today’s wetlands can be protected. Wetland acquisition by private environmental groups and land trusts adds important, but limited, protection. Government incentives rewarding private initiatives for conservation are limited and poorly funded. Although some private developers have recognized possible profit in protecting select wetlands, primarily for their aesthetic value, these developers probably would not preserve wetlands without strong government regulation.

The present strategy of stringent permit guidelines protecting every threatened wetland area regardless of type or value has not worked. About 300,000 acres of wetlands disappear each year. An alternative strategy is to regionalize management of valuable wetlands at risk. Extensive evaluations could identify critical wetland systems meeting particular regional and national needs and analyze the ill effects of abandonment. Federal, state, and local interests could then cooperate to seek ways of preventing anticipated wetland losses and control development in areas where wetland destruction is deemed unnecessary.    1 
 1. The author’s primary purpose in this passage is to

A. trace the historical development of wetland conversion in the United States
B. explain how a wetland area develops and thrives
C. call attention to an environmental problem and evaluate possible solutions
D. describe the encroachment of agricultural development on America’s wetlands
E. present a concept of environmental protection based on the experience of European immigrants

2 
 2. According to the passage, wetlands can provide all of the following environmental benefits EXCEPT:

A. a means of preventing coastal erosion
B. a habitat for endangered species
C. a medium for groundwater exchange
D. a source of fossil fuel
E. the assimilation of pollutants

3 
 3. Which of the following best describes the author’s attitude toward government acquisition of wetlands, acquisition by private environmental groups, and protection by private developers?

A. All three are limited in their potential for slowing wetland loss.
B. Acquisition by government and private groups offers some protection for wetlands, while actions by private developers will speed wetland loss.
C. All three strategies are promising, and more study is needed to determine which is best.
D. A combination of all three strategies, in conjunction with regional management, can potentially reverse the trend toward wetland conversion.
E. Governmental policy has worsened the problem of wetland loss by emphasizing government acquisition in preference to private acquisition and protection by developers.

4 
 4. The author states which of the following about wetland loss in the United States?

A. Businesses are justified in converting wetlands if they have no aesthetic value.
B. It can be prevented if the federal government will double its $40 million yearly allocation for wetland purchases.
C. It can be halted through a regional management approach.
D. It occurred most rapidly between the mid-1950s and mid-1970s.
E. The federal government should preserve the nation’s remaining 95 million acres of wetlands.

NawalDwivedi · Answer

1- C
2- D
3- A
4- D
are correct choices imo. Took me 7.5 mins.

Westfolia007 · Answer

IMO the answer choices are as follows : 1) C 2) D 3) D 4) D

asishron29181 · Answer

Para summary:

P1: Wetlands destruction in the USA.
P2: Importance of wetlands
P3: Government support not being significant to save the wetlands.
P4: Current strategy in use & author's alternative strategy.

IMO:

1-C
2-D
3-A
4-D

kantapong · Answer

Summary:
P1: US wetland lost due to agriculture
P2: Benefit of wetland
P3: Government intervention is limited
P4: Current strategy does not work + propose alt strategy

Q1 Purpose: talk about severity of wetland loss and propose alternative sol
=> The correct answer is C (call attention to env problem + evaluate possible sols)

Q2 benefit except D (fossil fuel) => refer to P2

Q3 Attitude toward policies => ineffective
Ans: A

Q4 The author states which of following (A, B are clearly wrong)
C. It can be halted through a regional management approach. (suggest alt sol, but not so far as to say that it can be halted)
D. It occurred most rapidly between the mid-1950s and mid-1970s. (YES, based on P1)
E. The federal government should preserve the nation’s remaining 95 million acres of wetlands. (quite opposite, the author suggests preserving wetlands based on risk, not all of them at once)
ans: D

anshum511 · Answer

C,D,A,D...600-650 level passage IMO

napolean92728 · Answer

🔍  Step 1: Identify Key Information in the Passage 
Even before seeing the question, you should identify:
 
 The  historical context  of wetland loss (mid-19th to 1970s) 
  Current challenges  to protecting wetlands (regulation, funding, limited success) 
  Three protection strategies  discussed:
 
 Government acquisition 
 Private environmental groups 
 Private developers  
 
 The  ineffectiveness of current strategies  and a proposed  regionalized alternative

🧠  Step 2: Keywords & Main Points for the Question 
 Question type:  Author’s  attitude/comparison  toward  three wetland protection methods :
 
  Government acquisition  
  Private group acquisition  
  Private developer protection   
 Keywords:  "best describes the author’s attitude," "limited," "some protection," "poorly funded," "would not preserve," "stringent guidelines not working"

📌  Step 3: Identify Relevant Paragraphs 
Focus on:
 
  Paragraph 3  (begins with  "At present, government intervention has only slowed..." ) — Discusses funding and protection limits of government and private groups. 
  Paragraph 4  (begins with  "The present strategy of stringent permit guidelines..." ) — Addresses the ineffectiveness of current strategies and introduces the alternative.

✅  Step 4: Choose Strategy — Elimination 
Use the  elimination strategy : we’ll assess each option against the  key attitudes and limitations  expressed in the passage.

🧩  Step 5: Eliminate Options One-by-One with Reasoning 
 A. All three are limited in their potential for slowing wetland loss. 
 
 ✅  Correct.  Paragraph 3 explicitly states:
 
 Government acquisition: limited by budget (only $40M/year) 
 Private environmental groups: limited protection 
 Private developers: likely won't protect without regulation  
 
 The author sees all three as  limited  = matches A exactly.  
 B. Acquisition by government and private groups offers some protection for wetlands, while actions by private developers will speed wetland loss. 
 
 ❌  Too strong/incorrect assumption.  The passage says developers  "probably would not preserve"  without regulation, but it doesn’t say they  actively cause more loss . 
 Author is neutral to cautiously pessimistic on developers, not blaming them entirely.  
 C. All three strategies are promising, and more study is needed to determine which is best. 
 
 ❌  Contradicts passage.  The author is  not optimistic  — stresses limitations and ineffectiveness.  
 D. A combination of all three strategies, in conjunction with regional management, can potentially reverse the trend toward wetland conversion. 
 
 ❌ Sounds like a solution-based proposal, but the  author critiques  current approaches and  proposes regionalization instead , not combining all three. 
 Author argues for a  new regional strategy , not combining all limited ones.  
 E. Governmental policy has worsened the problem of wetland loss by emphasizing government acquisition in preference to private acquisition and protection by developers. 
 
 ❌ No mention of government preferring acquisition over other forms. Also, doesn’t say policy  worsened  the problem — just that it's  not effective enough .

The United States has less than half of the 215 million acres of

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

The United States has less than half of the 215 million acres of

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards