Quote:
(A) a phenomenon most scientists agree to be caused by human beings in burning fossil fuels,
So if you’re a regular visitor to the verbal forums, you might have noticed that we’re banging away at a theme: if you aren’t strict and literal with the meaning of these sentences, you’re toast. We said a lot about that in our
beginners’ guide to SC, and it’s also been a theme in our QOTDs (all of which are available
here).
And this is another example of it! The phrase “human beings in burning fossil fuels” sounds like the human beings are... um, in a fiery tank of coal or oil? That sounds unpleasant. Plus, I’m not sold on the phrase “most scientists agree to be caused.” Seems like “is” would be better than “to be” here. Either way, (A) is out.
Quote:
(B) a phenomenon most scientists agree that is caused by fossil fuels burned by human beings,
Hm, the modifier “that is caused by fossil fuels” seems misplaced. It could be OK to say “scientists agree that X is true”, but we’re trying to modify the phenomenon here: “a phenomenon that is caused by fossil fuels” seems fine, but I can’t make sense of this one.
If you wanted to be conservative, you could hang onto (B) for now, but we’ll have a better option in a moment.
Quote:
(C) a phenomenon that most scientists agree is caused by human beings’ burning of fossil fuels,
Pardon my language, but this sounds awkward AF. That’s not a crime, though. (See
beginners’ guide to SC, for more on why “awkwardness” shouldn’t be your first worry.) And I can’t see any DEFINITE errors here. The “that” modifier is OK, and I guess I’m cool with the possessive “human beings’ burning of fossil fuels.” I don’t like it. But the GMAT doesn’t care what I like. The meaning makes sense: human beings’ act of burning fossil fuels is indeed the thing that causes global warming.
(C) isn’t wrong. Keep it, perhaps while holding your nose.
Quote:
(D) which most scientists agree on as a phenomenon caused by human beings who burn fossil fuels,
(D) arguably sounds better than (C), but (D) messes up the meaning. Rearranging slightly, (D) is saying that “scientists agree on global warming as a phenomenon caused by human beings who burn fossil fuel.” First, it would make sense to say that scientists agree
that global warming is a phenomenon caused by human beings, but scientists agree on it
as a phenomenon isn’t right: that’s basically saying that scientists agree that it’s a phenomenon, but that’s pretty meaningless.
Second, it’s awfully weird to say that global warming is “caused by human beings who burn fossil fuel.” The
act of burning fossil fuels causes global warming – not “human beings” who happen to burn fossil fuels.
I can’t totally fault you if you picked (D) over (C), but the meaning is much clearer in (C). I’d cross out (D).
Quote:
(E) which most scientists agree to be a phenomenon caused by fossil fuels burned by human beings,
The argument is similar for (E) as for (D), except that “agree to be a phenomenon” is a completely wacky phrase that makes even less sense than “agree on as a phenomenon.” And in (E), global warming is caused by the fossil fuels themselves, and that’s not quite right: it’s caused by human beings’ act of burning fossil fuels. So (E) warps the meaning, too.
We’re left with (C). I don’t like it, either. But it does a better, clearer job of conveying the meaning than any of the others.