Last visit was: 14 Jul 2025, 23:09 It is currently 14 Jul 2025, 23:09
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 14 July 2025
Posts: 102,576
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98,190
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,576
Kudos: 741,454
 [11]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sunaimshadmani
Joined: 05 Jun 2014
Last visit: 12 Apr 2019
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
88
 [1]
Given Kudos: 51
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V35
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V35
Posts: 56
Kudos: 88
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
revul
Joined: 07 Oct 2014
Last visit: 07 May 2016
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
68
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
WE:Sales (Other)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
JohanH
Joined: 16 Oct 2014
Last visit: 13 Nov 2014
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
24
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 6
Kudos: 24
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The key is EACH OF which means if there are 2 high level there are 8 mid level and 8*8=64 low level.

So A looks sufficient- BUT, the stem does not say the low level cannot report to more than one mid level managers. Say that 5 low level report to 2 mid level managers, then there can be 1 or 2 high level managers - so not sufficient.

B resolves this- if no one has more than one manager the only solution is to have 1 high level, 1 mid level and 1 low level.

C- combined sufficient.

Posted from GMAT ToolKit
avatar
agf625
Joined: 16 Oct 2014
Last visit: 24 Jan 2015
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
7
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: United States
GPA: 3.42
WE:Sales (Finance: Investment Banking)
Posts: 2
Kudos: 7
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If x = 1, then there's 1 high level, 1 med level, and 1 low level
If x = 2, there's 2 high level, each of whom supervise x^2 = 4, for a total of 8 mid level, each of whom supervise x^3 = 8 for 64 low level.

1 alone: tells you fewer than 60 low level, but x could equal 2 if low level employees report to more than one manager.
2 alone: could be any value for x

1 & 2 combined allow you to definitively answer, so answer is C
avatar
jeetmech152
Joined: 05 Apr 2013
Last visit: 27 Nov 2014
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
25
 [1]
Given Kudos: 36
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 5
Kudos: 25
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let H,M and L represent High,Medium and Low level officers resp.
By given condition:
if H=1 then M=1 and L=1
if H=2 then M=2*(2^2)=8 and L=8*(2^3)=64

(1) It tells us that L<60, thus only first of the above two situations satisfies. i.e H=1, it won't be true if H>1-->Sufficient
(2) In each of the above two situations, No official is supervised by more than one person as it is given in the question statement itself that each of relatively higher level officers supervise a set of lower level officers--> insufficient

Hence, the correct answer is choice(A)
User avatar
aimtoteach
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Last visit: 02 Feb 2016
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 62
Status:GMAT Date: 10/08/15
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Human Resources, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE:Human Resources (Consumer Packaged Goods)
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V35
Posts: 73
Kudos: 113
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Tough and Tricky questions: Word Problems.



There are x high-level officials (where x is a positive integer). Each high-level official supervises x^2 mid-level officials, each of whom, in turn, supervises x^3 low-level officials. How many high-level officials are there?

(1) There are fewer than 60 low-level officials.
(2) No official is supervised by more than one person.

Kudos for a correct solution.

Hi Bunuel,

I marked A. Could you please explain how does B contribute to the solution.

Thanks in advance.

aimtoteach
avatar
sabineodf
Joined: 28 Jan 2015
Last visit: 01 Jul 2015
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 51
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 670 Q44 V38
GMAT 1: 670 Q44 V38
Posts: 114
Kudos: 54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Tough and Tricky questions: Word Problems.



There are x high-level officials (where x is a positive integer). Each high-level official supervises x^2 mid-level officials, each of whom, in turn, supervises x^3 low-level officials. How many high-level officials are there?

(1) There are fewer than 60 low-level officials.
(2) No official is supervised by more than one person.

Kudos for a correct solution.

I also marked A, not sure how statement 1 contributes to the answer... My reasoning:

Statement 1: tells us that x^3<60

Statement 2: no official is supervised by more than one person: insinuates that x = x^2 = x^3 ... I thought this could only be true for x=1

Please clear up :shock: :shock: :-D :-D
avatar
sabineodf
Joined: 28 Jan 2015
Last visit: 01 Jul 2015
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 51
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 670 Q44 V38
GMAT 1: 670 Q44 V38
Posts: 114
Kudos: 54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sabineodf
Bunuel

Tough and Tricky questions: Word Problems.



There are x high-level officials (where x is a positive integer). Each high-level official supervises x^2 mid-level officials, each of whom, in turn, supervises x^3 low-level officials. How many high-level officials are there?

(1) There are fewer than 60 low-level officials.
(2) No official is supervised by more than one person.

Kudos for a correct solution.

I also marked A, not sure how statement 1 contributes to the answer... My reasoning:

Statement 1: tells us that x^3<60

Statement 2: no official is supervised by more than one person: insinuates that x = x^2 = x^3 ... I thought this could only be true for x=1

Please clear up :shock: :shock: :-D :-D


Reread my reasoning and the question and I retract my statements haha but I am still confused about the questions. I still don't understand how to get the answer though!

But I've realized that statement 1 has more value than I initially thought because it has narrowed the options of x down to 1, 2 or 3...

So what is B giving us that tells us which one it is?
User avatar
Harley1980
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jun 2024
Posts: 1,002
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 178
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 1,002
Kudos: 6,617
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aimtoteach
Bunuel

Tough and Tricky questions: Word Problems.



There are x high-level officials (where x is a positive integer). Each high-level official supervises x^2 mid-level officials, each of whom, in turn, supervises x^3 low-level officials. How many high-level officials are there?

(1) There are fewer than 60 low-level officials.
(2) No official is supervised by more than one person.

Kudos for a correct solution.

Hi Bunuel,

I marked A. Could you please explain how does B contribute to the solution.

Thanks in advance.

aimtoteach

Hello aimtoteach and sabineodf

Let's imagine that we have firm with 10 low level workers and 2 managers.
But we know nothing about hierarchy of this firm. Maybe each manager has 5 dedicated subordinates or maybe it's mix hierarchy and each manager has 10 subordinates: each from this employees has two managers and report to each managers for different tasks.

Second statement clarify situation about hierarchy of firm from the task.
User avatar
anairamitch1804
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2019
Posts: 506
Own Kudos:
3,526
 [4]
Given Kudos: 877
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE:Education (Education)
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
Posts: 506
Kudos: 3,526
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let's assume that there are 2 high level officials. This means that each of these 2 high level officials supervises 4 (or x^2) mid-level officials, and that each of these 4 mid-level officials supervises 8 (or x^3) low-level officials.

It is possible that the supervisors do not share any subordinates. If this is the case, then, given 2 high level officials, there must be 2(4) = 8 mid-level officials, and 8(8) = 64 low-level officials.

Alternatively, it is possible that the supervisors share all or some subordinates. In other words, given 2 high level officials, it is possible that there are as few as 4 mid-level officials (as each of the 2 high-level officials supervise the same 4 mid-level officials) and as few as 8 low-level officials (as each of the 4 mid-level officials supervise the same 8 low-level officials).

Statement (1) tells us that there are fewer than 60 low-level officials. This alone does not allow us to determine how many high-level officials there are. For example, there might be 2 high level officials, who each supervise the same 4 mid-level officials, who, in turn, each supervise the same 8 low-level officials. Alternatively, there might be 3 high-level officials, who each supervise the same 9 mid-level officials, who, in turn, each supervise the same 27 low-level officials.

Statement (2) tells us that no official is supervised by more than one person, which means that supervisors do not share any subordinates. Alone, this does not tell us anything about the number of high-level officials.

Combining statements 1 and 2, we can test out different possibilities.

If x = 1, there is 1 high-level official, who supervises 1 mid-level official (12 = 1), who, in turn, supervises 1 low-level official (13 = 1).

If x = 2, there are 2 high-level officials, who each supervise a unique group of 4 mid-level officials, yielding 8 mid-level officials in total. Each of these 8 mid-level officials supervise a unique group of 8 low-level officials, yielding 64 low-level officials in total. However, this cannot be the case since we are told that there are fewer than 60 low-level officials.

Therefore, based on both statements taken together, there must be only 1 high-level official. The correct answer is C: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
avatar
Nikhil099
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Last visit: 13 Jul 2025
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
29
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Location: India
Posts: 16
Kudos: 29
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(1) There are fewer than 60 low-level officials.
(2) No official is supervised by more than one person.


Stmt 1 gives us two possibilities = x can be 1 or 2. Not sufficient
Stmt 2 doesnt give any conclusive evidence.

Combining both we can conclude x = 1 since if x=2 , 4 unique mid level managers totaling 8 and then 8 unique low level managers totaling 64 people will come which is not possible. So x=1
Option C
User avatar
JohnSmith07
Joined: 28 Jan 2023
Last visit: 24 Nov 2024
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 4
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V85 DI84
GPA: 6.5
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V85 DI84
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is a tricky question, no where in the question it is mentioned that people reporting to their supervisors are mutually exclusive.
For example, lets say, there are 2 high level officials and there are 4 mid level officials and 8 low level officials. Now without statement 2 we can say that the 4 mid level officials report to both 2 high level officials and same in the case of 8 low level officials (they can report to all the 4 mid level officials.)

Statement 1 - Considering one official is reporting to one supervisor we get x=1; If we consider one official reporting to multiple supervisor, answer may vary.

Statement 2 - This clarifies the above ambiguity.

Hence the answer is C.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 37,399
Own Kudos:
Posts: 37,399
Kudos: 1,013
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderator:
Math Expert
102575 posts