Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Nov. 17, 7 AM PST. Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
There is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of ma
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 21 Sep 2018, 02:35
14
91
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
85% (hard)
Question Stats:
52% (02:15) correct 48% (02:25) wrong based on 2851 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
There is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of many surgical procedures—up to tenfold variation per hundred thousand between different areas in the numbers of hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies.
To support a conclusion that much of the variation is due to unnecessary surgical procedure, it would be most important to establish which of the following?
(A) A local board of review to each hospital examines the records of every operation to determine whether the surgical procedure was necessary.
(B) The variation is unrelated to factors (other than the surgical procedures themselves) that influence the incidence of diseases for which surgery might be considered.
(C) There are several categories of surgical procedure (other than hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies) that are often performed unnecessarily.
(D) For certain surgical procedures, it is difficult to determine after the operation whether the procedures were necessary or whether alternative treatment would have succeeded.
(E) With respect to how often they are performed unnecessarily, hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies are representative of surgical procedures in general.
Verbal Question of The Day: Day 240: Critical Reasoning
Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day:E-mail | RSS For All QOTD Questions Click Here
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition
There is a great deal of geographic variation in the use of many surgical procedures — up to 10-fold differences in hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies among different areas. The variations seem unrelated to disease incidence and death rates, and have no discernible effect on the general health of the population. In part, the unnecessary use of medical technologies and procedures stems from the poor quality of much clinical
Re: QOTD: There is a great deal of geographical variation
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Mar 2018, 22:49
4
3
We are told that there is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of many surgical procedures. Now we need to support the conclusion that much of that variation is due to unnecessary surgical procedure.
So we are given some facts and a conclusion, and we need to select the statement that, if established, would make our argument the strongest. In other words, we are trying to complete the argument with information that would most support the conclusion.
Let's review what we have so far:
"There is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of many surgical procedures."
What does that variation look like? Well, there is "up to tenfold variation per hundred thousand between different areas in the numbers of hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies." So the frequency of those procedures varies geographically.
What causes that variation? Several theories could explain this geographical variation, but we are given one specific theory: "much of the variation is due to unnecessary surgical procedure."
But we don't have any evidence that this theory is correct. We need something that would help support this theory.
Quote:
(A) A local board of review to each hospital examines the records of every operation to determine whether the surgical procedure was necessary.
(A) is tempting because this could lead to evidence that would support our conclusion. But whether (A) hurts or helps our argument depends on what those local review boards actually find. Perhaps they'll find that, in the areas with high numbers of surgical procedures, many of the procedures were actually unnecessary. That would obviously strengthen our conclusion.
But we can't assume that the boards' results will help our argument. Perhaps the data from the review boards will actually contradict our conclusion. Or perhaps the review boards themselves will have local biases (i.e. different opinions about what constitutes a "necessary" surgery).
Choice (A) MIGHT lead to results that strengthen our conclusion. But, without further information, we can't be sure. We can hang on to this one for now, but (A) is not looking great.
Quote:
(B) The variation is unrelated to factors (other than the surgical procedures themselves) that influence the incidence of diseases for which surgery might be considered.
This one's much better. If the variation is actually due to factors that influence the INCIDENCE of diseases that might require surgery, then we would have an explanation that contradicts our conclusion. For example, perhaps people living along the coast are, for some reason, more susceptible to tonsillitis and thus are more likely to require tonsillectomies. This would indeed explain a geographical variation in tonsillectomies and would weaken our conclusion.
If choice (B) is established, then we can eliminate this alternate explanation. That would directly strengthen our argument, so (B) looks good.
Quote:
(C) There are several categories of surgical procedure (other than hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies) that are often performed unnecessarily.
Simply knowing that different types of procedures are often performed unnecessarily does not support our conclusion. Do unnecessary surgical procedures explain the geographical variations described in the passage? Choice (C) doesn't support this theory, so eliminate (C).
Quote:
(D) For certain surgical procedures, it is difficult to determine after the operation whether the procedures were necessary or whether alternative treatment would have succeeded.
This statement suggests that it is difficult to distinguish between necessary and unnecessary procedures. This, in turn, suggests that it would be difficult to actually test our theory. If we can't confidently determine that some surgeries were unnecessary, how can we show that unnecessary surgeries explain the geographical variations?
Choice (D) suggests that our theory might be difficult to study, and it certainly does not support our conclusion. Eliminate (D).
Quote:
(E) With respect to how often they are performed unnecessarily, hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies are representative of surgical procedures in general.
Say we have an area that performed ten times as many hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies as another area. According to our theory, many of the surgeries in the first area were probably unnecessary. This would explain the variation. If we can show that many of the surgeries in the first area were in fact unnecessary, then our theory would look pretty good.
That would NOT necessarily mean that, in general, unnecessary surgical procedures are performed about as frequently as unnecessary hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies. Maybe, for some reason, unnecessary hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies are performed much more often than other unnecessary surgeries.
If we can show that hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies were performed unnecessarily in areas with high frequencies of such operations, then we've demonstrated that our theory is valid. It doesn't matter whether these trends apply to surgical procedures in general. Eliminate (E).
Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
Re: There is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of ma
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Apr 2005, 18:07
8
4
1) There is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of many surgical procedures
2) Up to tenfold variation per hundred thousand people between different areas in the numbers of hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies.
Conclusion: Variation is due to unnecessary surgical procedures
A: A local board of review at each hospital examines the records of every operation to detemine whether the surgical procedure was neccesary.
- Does not tells us that redundant surgical procedures cause variations
B: The variation is unrelated to factors(other than the surgical procedures themselves) that influence the incidence of diseases for which surgery might be considered.
- Explains that variation is due to the surgical procedures alone and nothing else
C: There are several categories of surgical procedure(other than hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies) that are often performed unneccesarily.
- Does not explain the conclusion
D: For certain surgical procedures, it is difficult to determine after the operation whether the procedures were necessary or whether alternative treatment would have succeeded.
- Not useful
E: With respect to how often they are performed unneccesarily, hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies are representative of surgical procedures in general.
- Not useful
Re: There is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of ma
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Sep 2005, 10:24
4
The OA is B.
Here is the official explanation:
To establish that much of the varation is due to unnecessary surgical procedures, it is necessary to eliminate that possibility that the geographical varation reflects varation in the incidence of disease treated with these procedures. Choice B, if established, would eliminate this possibility and is thus the best answer.
Review boards (choice A) would provide some control against unnecessary procedures, so choice A would, if anything, tell again the suggested conclusion. Neither choice C nor choice E bears on the conclusion, since neither the conclusion nor the cited geographical variation involves procedures are of the kind choice D describes, the diffculty of determining an individual operation's necessity would merely increase the difficulty of verifying the suggested conclusion.
Re: There is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of ma
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Aug 2009, 19:11
2
For me, B is clear and typical for GMAT:
[Cause: surgical procedures] --?-> [result: variation] We need: there is no other cause (but surgical procedures) that results in [variation]
At the same time, C is also a typical trap: it says something about other surgical procedures (out of scope), but we consider here the variation in the numbers of hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies.
_________________
Re: There is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of ma
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Mar 2012, 21:26
3
No, this is not an assumption question.
The question asks us to identify the option which will best allow us to determine whether much of the variation in surgical procedures across geographies is due to unnecessary surgical procedures.
A: Incorrect. Even if a local board reviews for the necessity of surgical procedures, we have nothing here to tell us whether they end up recommending unnecessary surgical procedures B: CORRECT. If the variation is unrelated to factors related to the incidence of diseases, then it must be a result of incorrect recommendations being made C: Incorrect. Even if a large number of surgical procedures are incorrectly recommended, we do not have enough information to conclude that the variation is a result of these D: Incorrect. If it is difficult to determine whether the procedures were necessary, it will be more, and not less difficult to determine the need for them E: Incorrect. Similar to C.
Re: There is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of ma
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 12 Jul 2016, 09:34
1
Like Word problems in algebra, it is very important to assimilate the questions in CR and then simplify them in common terms
THE QUESTION IS There is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of many surgical procedures - up to tenfold variation per hundred thousand between different areas in the numbers of hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies.
To support a conclusion that much of the variation is due to unnecessary surgical procedure, it would be most important to establish which of the following ?
A)A local board of review to each hospital examines the records of every operation to determine whether the surgical procedure was necessary. B)The variation is unrelated to factors (other than the surgical procedures themselves) that influence the incidence of diseases for which surgery might be considered. C)There are several categories of surgical procedure (other than hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies) that are often performed unnecessarily. D)For certain surgical procedures, it is difficult to determine after the operation whether the procedures were necessary or whether alternative treatment would have succeeded. E)With respect to how often they are performed unnecessarily, hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies are representative of surgical procedures in general.
The question is making us to pick the assumption, which is noting but an understated premise. SO we have to pick an answer that is the assumption made to derive the conclusion. This argument can be simplified and broken into premises and conclusion as follows :-
Premise 1 ) There is a huge variation in number and type of surgeries in a country. Location A has 300 eye surgeries, Location B has 200 heart surgeries and Location C has 400 kidney surgeries. Premise 2) ----- NOT GIVEN------ NO OTHER PREMISE IS GIVEN. WE ARE DIRECTLY GIVEN A CONCLUSION AND ASKED TO PICKED THE MISSING PREMISE 2
CONSLUSION ) These surgeries were unnecessary.
If you look at Premise 1 only, you might conclude that many people in location A are suffering from eye disease. Population of Location B suffers from a heart disease, and Location C has some disease that is affecting the kidneys of many people. That is the reason there is no much variation in each location and its disease type. These diseases must be dangerous if not treated urgently.
But then comes the conclusion that say :- THE SURGERIES WERE UNNECESSARY. Now, If we add a premise such as :- This variation is not caused due to the difference in number of people suffering from eye, heart and kidney disease.
How does our argument now looks like ?? ==> Premise 1 ) There is a huge variation in number and type of surgeries in a different parts of the country. Premise 2) This variation in surgeries is NOT because different people suffer from different disease in different location. Conclusion) If these variations are not because people were suffering==> then these surgeries were unnecessary.
_________________
Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly. FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.
Originally posted by LogicGuru1 on 12 Jun 2016, 04:57.
Last edited by LogicGuru1 on 12 Jul 2016, 09:34, edited 1 time in total.
Re: There is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of ma
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Nov 2017, 00:28
MartinMag wrote:
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition
Practice Question Question No.: 55 Page: 138
There is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of many surgical procedures—up to tenfold variation per hundred thousand between different areas in the numbers of hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies.
To support a conclusion that much of the variation is due to unnecessary surgical procedure, it would be most important to establish which of the following?
(A) A local board of review to each hospital examines the records of every operation to determine whether the surgical procedure was necessary.
(B) The variation is unrelated to factors (other than the surgical procedures themselves) that influence the incidence of diseases for which surgery might be considered.
(C) There are several categories of surgical procedure (other than hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies) that are often performed unnecessarily.
(D) For certain surgical procedures, it is difficult to determine after the operation whether the procedures were necessary or whether alternative treatment would have succeeded.
(E) With respect to how often they are performed unnecessarily, hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies are representative of surgical procedures in general.
The below explanation is from David (Veritas Prep) -
This is a special type of the strengthen question where the conclusion is in the question stem. Please be on the lookout for this as it occurs fairly regularly.
The conclusion is "much of the variation is due to unnecessary surgical procedures" This indicates a cause and effect relationship. We are, in effect, saying that the reason that there is a geographical variation in the listed procedures is because in the areas where more procedures are performed many of those procedures are not necessary.
Now there could be other reasons for a variation in the number of surgeries. For example, the new natural gas wells that are being drilled in people's back yards have been proven to contaminate the water supply and so it would be very reasonable to see additional cases of cancer and therefore additional procedures near these poisonous wells. So that would be another cause not unnecessary procedures, but variations in the toxicity of various places around the U.S. (or the world depending on how you read the question).
In order to strengthen a question that involves cause and effect, you will want to consider the possibility of blocking an alternate cause. In this case we are saying the cause is the "unnecessary procedures" so we want to block the things that would make these procedures necessary - like variations in the age of the population, the health of the people, the quality of the water, even the ability of the people to pay for the procedures.
Answer Choice B does this. It says, "The variation is unrelated to factors (other than the surgical procedures themselves) that influence the incidence of diseases for which surgery might be considered." So this blocks the idea that the cause of varying rates of procedures would be any of the factors (age, health, toxins) etc. mentioned above. So we strengthen one cause by blocking another.
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long +1 Kudos if you find this post helpful
The stimulus says there is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of many surgical procedures. The many is important here. The stimulus is not saying that there is variation in the frequency of every possible procedure—just in "many". Then the stimulus tells us which procedures form the "many" (hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies). If you're not sure about this, read the stimulus as "there is a lot of variation in the frequency of many surgical procedures—up to tenfold variation in A, B, and C procedures". The part after the dash limits the scope of the question. This is different from trying to change the "degree" with something like "there is a lot of variation in the frequency of many surgical procedures—and up to tenfold variation in A, B, and C procedures".
The conclusion is that this variation can be explained by unnecessary surgical procedures. We need to strengthen this, so the correct option will help us believe that unnecessary hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies are being performed in some areas (more frequently than in others).
MartinMag wrote:
(A) A local board of review to each hospital examines the records of every operation to determine whether the surgical procedure was necessary.
This option says that there is (already) a local board of review at every single hospital. If such a board reviews surgical procedures to check whether they were necessary or not, we are LESS likely to believe that the variation is due to unnecessary surgical procedures.
Keep in mind that this option is not presenting us a recommendation. It tells us that such boards are already in place. Also, don't add any extra information (like "the boards are not functioning well").
MartinMag wrote:
(B) The variation is unrelated to factors (other than the surgical procedures themselves) that influence the incidence of diseases for which surgery might be considered.
This is good. The conclusion is that the variation is due to X. This option strengthens that conclusion by saying that the variation is unrelated to factors other than X (leaving only X to explain the variation).
MartinMag wrote:
(C) There are several categories of surgical procedure (other than hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies) that are often performed unnecessarily.
This option (a) discusses procedures other than the ones the question is concerned with and (b) gives us no information about the link to geographical variation. If it had said that the same geographical variation is observed in other categories, we would have had some reason to think that the variation observed in the frequency of hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies is due to unnecessary surgical procedures. But this option doesn't do that. It just says that there are other procedures that are often performed unnecessarily.
MartinMag wrote:
(D) For certain surgical procedures, it is difficult to determine after the operation whether the procedures were necessary or whether alternative treatment would have succeeded.
If this is true, all geographical regions should find the process equally difficult. There's nothing here to suggest that there is any geographical variation in the frequency of unnecessary surgical procedures. Also, this option doesn't really specify whether "certain" includes hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies.
MartinMag wrote:
(E) With respect to how often they are performed unnecessarily, hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies are representative of surgical procedures in general.
Whether the three are representative or not is irrelevant. We first need to establish that the variation in the frequency of the three procedures is in fact due to unnecessary surgical procedures.
_________________
Re: There is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of ma
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Mar 2018, 09:16
There is a great deal of geographical variation in the frequency of many surgical procedures—up to tenfold variation per hundred thousand between different areas in the numbers of hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies.
To support a conclusion that much of the variation is due to unnecessary surgical procedure, it would be most important to establish which of the following?
(A) A local board of review to each hospital examines the records of every operation to determine whether the surgical procedure was necessary. --It weakens the argument
(B) The variation is unrelated to factors (other than the surgical procedures themselves) that influence the incidence of diseases for which surgery might be considered. --Correct. It removes the possibility that any other factor might impact the procedure
(C) There are several categories of surgical procedure (other than hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies) that are often performed unnecessarily. --Out of scope
(D) For certain surgical procedures, it is difficult to determine after the operation whether the procedures were necessary or whether alternative treatment would have succeeded. --This weakens the argument
(E) With respect to how often they are performed unnecessarily, hysterectomies, prostatectomies, and tonsillectomies are representative of surgical procedures in general. --Out of scope _________________
close
52% (02:15) correct 
